TSTP Solution File: SWV242-1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : SWV242-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 03:13:49 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 9.56s 2.22s
% Output : CNFRefutation 9.56s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 15 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 24 ( 0 equ; 13 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_63,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X0),c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz__mono_0) ).
cnf(c_78,plain,
c_lessequals(X0,c_union(X0,X1,X2),tc_set(X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUn__upper1_0) ).
cnf(c_79,plain,
c_lessequals(X0,c_union(X1,X0,X2),tc_set(X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUn__upper2_0) ).
cnf(c_80,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2))
| ~ c_lessequals(X1,X3,tc_set(X2))
| c_lessequals(X0,X3,tc_set(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_Osubset__trans_0) ).
cnf(c_81,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(v_G,c_Message_Oanalz(v_G_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_82,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(v_H,c_Message_Oanalz(v_H_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(c_83,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_lessequals(v_G,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(v_H,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(c_24043,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G_H),X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| c_lessequals(v_G,X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_81,c_80]) ).
cnf(c_24044,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H_H),X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| c_lessequals(v_H,X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_82,c_80]) ).
cnf(c_24111,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(v_H_H,X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| c_lessequals(v_H,c_Message_Oanalz(X0),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_24044]) ).
cnf(c_24122,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(v_G_H,X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| c_lessequals(v_G,c_Message_Oanalz(X0),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_24043]) ).
cnf(c_24384,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(v_G,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(v_H_H,c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_24111,c_83]) ).
cnf(c_24947,plain,
~ c_lessequals(v_G,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_24384,c_79]) ).
cnf(c_24948,plain,
~ c_lessequals(v_G_H,c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_24122,c_24947]) ).
cnf(c_29910,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_24948,c_78]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWV242-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Fri May 3 00:49:22 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 9.56/2.22 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 9.56/2.22 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 9.56/2.22
% 9.56/2.22 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 9.56/2.22
% 9.56/2.22 ------ iProver source info
% 9.56/2.22
% 9.56/2.22 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 9.56/2.22 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 9.56/2.22 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 9.56/2.22
% 9.56/2.22 ------ Parsing...successful
% 9.56/2.22
% 9.56/2.22
% 9.56/2.22
% 9.56/2.22 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1 sf_s rm: 823 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe:8:0s pe:16:0s pe_e
% 9.56/2.22
% 9.56/2.22 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 9.56/2.22
% 9.56/2.22 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 9.56/2.22 ------ Proving...
% 9.56/2.22 ------ Problem Properties
% 9.56/2.22
% 9.56/2.22
% 9.56/2.22 clauses 327
% 9.56/2.22 conjectures 3
% 9.56/2.22 EPR 27
% 9.56/2.22 Horn 299
% 9.56/2.22 unary 83
% 9.56/2.22 binary 194
% 9.56/2.22 lits 621
% 9.56/2.22 lits eq 185
% 9.56/2.22 fd_pure 0
% 9.56/2.22 fd_pseudo 0
% 9.56/2.22 fd_cond 21
% 9.56/2.22 fd_pseudo_cond 50
% 9.56/2.22 AC symbols 0
% 9.56/2.22
% 9.56/2.22 ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 9.56/2.22
% 9.56/2.22
% 9.56/2.22 ------
% 9.56/2.22 Current options:
% 9.56/2.22 ------
% 9.56/2.22
% 9.56/2.22
% 9.56/2.22
% 9.56/2.22
% 9.56/2.22 ------ Proving...
% 9.56/2.22
% 9.56/2.22
% 9.56/2.22 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 9.56/2.22
% 9.56/2.22 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 9.56/2.22
% 9.56/2.22
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------