TSTP Solution File: SWV230+1 by PyRes---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.5
% Problem : SWV230+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May 9 17:44:28 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.85s 1.01s
% Output : Refutation 0.85s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWV230+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu May 9 05:21:23 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.85/1.01 % Version: 1.5
% 0.85/1.01 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.85/1.01 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.85/1.01 fof(quaternion_ds1_symm_0761,conjecture,(((![A]:(![B]:((((leq(n0,A)&leq(n0,B))&leq(A,n5))&leq(B,n5))=>a_select3(q_ds1_filter,A,B)=a_select3(q_ds1_filter,B,A))))&(![C]:(![D]:((((leq(n0,C)&leq(n0,D))&leq(C,n2))&leq(D,n2))=>a_select3(r_ds1_filter,C,D)=a_select3(r_ds1_filter,D,C)))))=>(![E]:(![F]:((((leq(n0,E)&leq(n0,F))&leq(E,n5))&leq(F,n5))=>((((((((((((((~(n0=E&n5=F))&(~(n1=E&n5=F)))&(~(n2=E&n5=F)))&(~(n2=F&n5=E)))&(~(n3=E&n5=F)))&(~(n3=F&n5=E)))&(~(n4=E&n5=F)))&(~(n4=F&n5=E)))&(~(n5=E&n5=F)))&n1=F)&n4=E)&n4=F)&n5=E)=>n0=a_select2(xinit_noise,n4)))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', quaternion_ds1_symm_0761)).
% 0.85/1.01 fof(c66,negated_conjecture,(~(((![A]:(![B]:((((leq(n0,A)&leq(n0,B))&leq(A,n5))&leq(B,n5))=>a_select3(q_ds1_filter,A,B)=a_select3(q_ds1_filter,B,A))))&(![C]:(![D]:((((leq(n0,C)&leq(n0,D))&leq(C,n2))&leq(D,n2))=>a_select3(r_ds1_filter,C,D)=a_select3(r_ds1_filter,D,C)))))=>(![E]:(![F]:((((leq(n0,E)&leq(n0,F))&leq(E,n5))&leq(F,n5))=>((((((((((((((~(n0=E&n5=F))&(~(n1=E&n5=F)))&(~(n2=E&n5=F)))&(~(n2=F&n5=E)))&(~(n3=E&n5=F)))&(~(n3=F&n5=E)))&(~(n4=E&n5=F)))&(~(n4=F&n5=E)))&(~(n5=E&n5=F)))&n1=F)&n4=E)&n4=F)&n5=E)=>n0=a_select2(xinit_noise,n4))))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[quaternion_ds1_symm_0761])).
% 0.85/1.01 fof(c67,negated_conjecture,(((![A]:(![B]:((((~leq(n0,A)|~leq(n0,B))|~leq(A,n5))|~leq(B,n5))|a_select3(q_ds1_filter,A,B)=a_select3(q_ds1_filter,B,A))))&(![C]:(![D]:((((~leq(n0,C)|~leq(n0,D))|~leq(C,n2))|~leq(D,n2))|a_select3(r_ds1_filter,C,D)=a_select3(r_ds1_filter,D,C)))))&(?[E]:(?[F]:((((leq(n0,E)&leq(n0,F))&leq(E,n5))&leq(F,n5))&((((((((((((((n0!=E|n5!=F)&(n1!=E|n5!=F))&(n2!=E|n5!=F))&(n2!=F|n5!=E))&(n3!=E|n5!=F))&(n3!=F|n5!=E))&(n4!=E|n5!=F))&(n4!=F|n5!=E))&(n5!=E|n5!=F))&n1=F)&n4=E)&n4=F)&n5=E)&n0!=a_select2(xinit_noise,n4)))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c66])).
% 0.85/1.01 fof(c68,negated_conjecture,(((![X8]:(![X9]:((((~leq(n0,X8)|~leq(n0,X9))|~leq(X8,n5))|~leq(X9,n5))|a_select3(q_ds1_filter,X8,X9)=a_select3(q_ds1_filter,X9,X8))))&(![X10]:(![X11]:((((~leq(n0,X10)|~leq(n0,X11))|~leq(X10,n2))|~leq(X11,n2))|a_select3(r_ds1_filter,X10,X11)=a_select3(r_ds1_filter,X11,X10)))))&(?[X12]:(?[X13]:((((leq(n0,X12)&leq(n0,X13))&leq(X12,n5))&leq(X13,n5))&((((((((((((((n0!=X12|n5!=X13)&(n1!=X12|n5!=X13))&(n2!=X12|n5!=X13))&(n2!=X13|n5!=X12))&(n3!=X12|n5!=X13))&(n3!=X13|n5!=X12))&(n4!=X12|n5!=X13))&(n4!=X13|n5!=X12))&(n5!=X12|n5!=X13))&n1=X13)&n4=X12)&n4=X13)&n5=X12)&n0!=a_select2(xinit_noise,n4)))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c67])).
% 0.85/1.01 fof(c70,negated_conjecture,(![X8]:(![X9]:(![X10]:(![X11]:((((((~leq(n0,X8)|~leq(n0,X9))|~leq(X8,n5))|~leq(X9,n5))|a_select3(q_ds1_filter,X8,X9)=a_select3(q_ds1_filter,X9,X8))&((((~leq(n0,X10)|~leq(n0,X11))|~leq(X10,n2))|~leq(X11,n2))|a_select3(r_ds1_filter,X10,X11)=a_select3(r_ds1_filter,X11,X10)))&((((leq(n0,skolem0001)&leq(n0,skolem0002))&leq(skolem0001,n5))&leq(skolem0002,n5))&((((((((((((((n0!=skolem0001|n5!=skolem0002)&(n1!=skolem0001|n5!=skolem0002))&(n2!=skolem0001|n5!=skolem0002))&(n2!=skolem0002|n5!=skolem0001))&(n3!=skolem0001|n5!=skolem0002))&(n3!=skolem0002|n5!=skolem0001))&(n4!=skolem0001|n5!=skolem0002))&(n4!=skolem0002|n5!=skolem0001))&(n5!=skolem0001|n5!=skolem0002))&n1=skolem0002)&n4=skolem0001)&n4=skolem0002)&n5=skolem0001)&n0!=a_select2(xinit_noise,n4)))))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[fof(c69,negated_conjecture,(((![X8]:(![X9]:((((~leq(n0,X8)|~leq(n0,X9))|~leq(X8,n5))|~leq(X9,n5))|a_select3(q_ds1_filter,X8,X9)=a_select3(q_ds1_filter,X9,X8))))&(![X10]:(![X11]:((((~leq(n0,X10)|~leq(n0,X11))|~leq(X10,n2))|~leq(X11,n2))|a_select3(r_ds1_filter,X10,X11)=a_select3(r_ds1_filter,X11,X10)))))&((((leq(n0,skolem0001)&leq(n0,skolem0002))&leq(skolem0001,n5))&leq(skolem0002,n5))&((((((((((((((n0!=skolem0001|n5!=skolem0002)&(n1!=skolem0001|n5!=skolem0002))&(n2!=skolem0001|n5!=skolem0002))&(n2!=skolem0002|n5!=skolem0001))&(n3!=skolem0001|n5!=skolem0002))&(n3!=skolem0002|n5!=skolem0001))&(n4!=skolem0001|n5!=skolem0002))&(n4!=skolem0002|n5!=skolem0001))&(n5!=skolem0001|n5!=skolem0002))&n1=skolem0002)&n4=skolem0001)&n4=skolem0002)&n5=skolem0001)&n0!=a_select2(xinit_noise,n4)))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[c68])).])).
% 0.85/1.01 cnf(c88,negated_conjecture,n4=skolem0002,inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c70])).
% 0.85/1.01 cnf(c89,negated_conjecture,n5=skolem0001,inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c70])).
% 0.85/1.01 cnf(c84,negated_conjecture,n4!=skolem0002|n5!=skolem0001,inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c70])).
% 0.85/1.01 cnf(c1333,plain,n4!=skolem0002,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c84, c89])).
% 0.85/1.01 cnf(c1334,plain,$false,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c1333, c88])).
% 0.85/1.01 % SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.85/1.01
% 0.85/1.01 % Initial clauses : 332
% 0.85/1.01 % Processed clauses : 196
% 0.85/1.01 % Factors computed : 26
% 0.85/1.01 % Resolvents computed: 832
% 0.85/1.01 % Tautologies deleted: 2
% 0.85/1.01 % Forward subsumed : 67
% 0.85/1.01 % Backward subsumed : 3
% 0.85/1.01 % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.85/1.01 % User time : 0.649 s
% 0.85/1.01 % System time : 0.014 s
% 0.85/1.01 % Total time : 0.663 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------