TSTP Solution File: SWV219+1 by SRASS---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SRASS---0.1
% Problem : SWV219+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s
% Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Dec 30 08:45:18 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 1.18s
% Output : Solution 1.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP17727/SWV219+1.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM ...
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP17727/SWV219+1.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP17727/SWV219+1.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 17823
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.00 WC
% # Preprocessing time : 0.033 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(92, conjecture,![X14]:![X17]:((((leq(n0,X14)&leq(n0,X17))&leq(X14,n5))&leq(X17,n5))=>(((((((((((((((~((n0=X14&n5=X17))&~((n0=X17&n5=X14)))&~((n1=X14&n5=X17)))&~((n1=X17&n5=X14)))&~((n2=X14&n5=X17)))&~((n2=X17&n5=X14)))&~((n3=X14&n5=X17)))&~((n3=X17&n5=X14)))&~((n4=X14&n4=X17)))&~((n4=X14&n5=X17)))&~((n4=X17&n5=X14)))&~((n5=X14&n5=X17)))&n3=X14)&n4=X14)&n4=X17)=>times(divide(n1,n400),a_select2(sigma,n4))=n0)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', quaternion_ds1_symm_0321)).
% fof(93, negated_conjecture,~(![X14]:![X17]:((((leq(n0,X14)&leq(n0,X17))&leq(X14,n5))&leq(X17,n5))=>(((((((((((((((~((n0=X14&n5=X17))&~((n0=X17&n5=X14)))&~((n1=X14&n5=X17)))&~((n1=X17&n5=X14)))&~((n2=X14&n5=X17)))&~((n2=X17&n5=X14)))&~((n3=X14&n5=X17)))&~((n3=X17&n5=X14)))&~((n4=X14&n4=X17)))&~((n4=X14&n5=X17)))&~((n4=X17&n5=X14)))&~((n5=X14&n5=X17)))&n3=X14)&n4=X14)&n4=X17)=>times(divide(n1,n400),a_select2(sigma,n4))=n0))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[92])).
% fof(96, plain,![X14]:![X17]:(epred2_2(X17,X14)=>((((((((((((((~((n0=X14&n5=X17))&~((n0=X17&n5=X14)))&~((n1=X14&n5=X17)))&~((n1=X17&n5=X14)))&~((n2=X14&n5=X17)))&~((n2=X17&n5=X14)))&~((n3=X14&n5=X17)))&~((n3=X17&n5=X14)))&~((n4=X14&n4=X17)))&~((n4=X14&n5=X17)))&~((n4=X17&n5=X14)))&~((n5=X14&n5=X17)))&n3=X14)&n4=X14)&n4=X17)),introduced(definition)).
% fof(98, negated_conjecture,~(![X14]:![X17]:((((leq(n0,X14)&leq(n0,X17))&leq(X14,n5))&leq(X17,n5))=>(epred2_2(X17,X14)=>times(divide(n1,n400),a_select2(sigma,n4))=n0))),inference(apply_def,[status(esa)],[93,96,theory(equality)])).
% fof(390, negated_conjecture,?[X14]:?[X17]:((((leq(n0,X14)&leq(n0,X17))&leq(X14,n5))&leq(X17,n5))&(epred2_2(X17,X14)&~(times(divide(n1,n400),a_select2(sigma,n4))=n0))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[98])).
% fof(391, negated_conjecture,?[X18]:?[X19]:((((leq(n0,X18)&leq(n0,X19))&leq(X18,n5))&leq(X19,n5))&(epred2_2(X19,X18)&~(times(divide(n1,n400),a_select2(sigma,n4))=n0))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[390])).
% fof(392, negated_conjecture,((((leq(n0,esk24_0)&leq(n0,esk25_0))&leq(esk24_0,n5))&leq(esk25_0,n5))&(epred2_2(esk25_0,esk24_0)&~(times(divide(n1,n400),a_select2(sigma,n4))=n0))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[391])).
% cnf(394,negated_conjecture,(epred2_2(esk25_0,esk24_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[392])).
% fof(428, plain,![X14]:![X17]:(~(epred2_2(X17,X14))|(((((((((((((((~(n0=X14)|~(n5=X17))&(~(n0=X17)|~(n5=X14)))&(~(n1=X14)|~(n5=X17)))&(~(n1=X17)|~(n5=X14)))&(~(n2=X14)|~(n5=X17)))&(~(n2=X17)|~(n5=X14)))&(~(n3=X14)|~(n5=X17)))&(~(n3=X17)|~(n5=X14)))&(~(n4=X14)|~(n4=X17)))&(~(n4=X14)|~(n5=X17)))&(~(n4=X17)|~(n5=X14)))&(~(n5=X14)|~(n5=X17)))&n3=X14)&n4=X14)&n4=X17)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[96])).
% fof(429, plain,![X18]:![X19]:(~(epred2_2(X19,X18))|(((((((((((((((~(n0=X18)|~(n5=X19))&(~(n0=X19)|~(n5=X18)))&(~(n1=X18)|~(n5=X19)))&(~(n1=X19)|~(n5=X18)))&(~(n2=X18)|~(n5=X19)))&(~(n2=X19)|~(n5=X18)))&(~(n3=X18)|~(n5=X19)))&(~(n3=X19)|~(n5=X18)))&(~(n4=X18)|~(n4=X19)))&(~(n4=X18)|~(n5=X19)))&(~(n4=X19)|~(n5=X18)))&(~(n5=X18)|~(n5=X19)))&n3=X18)&n4=X18)&n4=X19)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[428])).
% fof(430, plain,![X18]:![X19]:((((((((((((((((~(n0=X18)|~(n5=X19))|~(epred2_2(X19,X18)))&((~(n0=X19)|~(n5=X18))|~(epred2_2(X19,X18))))&((~(n1=X18)|~(n5=X19))|~(epred2_2(X19,X18))))&((~(n1=X19)|~(n5=X18))|~(epred2_2(X19,X18))))&((~(n2=X18)|~(n5=X19))|~(epred2_2(X19,X18))))&((~(n2=X19)|~(n5=X18))|~(epred2_2(X19,X18))))&((~(n3=X18)|~(n5=X19))|~(epred2_2(X19,X18))))&((~(n3=X19)|~(n5=X18))|~(epred2_2(X19,X18))))&((~(n4=X18)|~(n4=X19))|~(epred2_2(X19,X18))))&((~(n4=X18)|~(n5=X19))|~(epred2_2(X19,X18))))&((~(n4=X19)|~(n5=X18))|~(epred2_2(X19,X18))))&((~(n5=X18)|~(n5=X19))|~(epred2_2(X19,X18))))&(n3=X18|~(epred2_2(X19,X18))))&(n4=X18|~(epred2_2(X19,X18))))&(n4=X19|~(epred2_2(X19,X18)))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[429])).
% cnf(431,plain,(n4=X1|~epred2_2(X1,X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[430])).
% cnf(432,plain,(n4=X2|~epred2_2(X1,X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[430])).
% cnf(437,plain,(~epred2_2(X1,X2)|n4!=X1|n4!=X2),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[430])).
% cnf(476,plain,(n4!=X2|~epred2_2(X1,X2)),inference(csr,[status(thm)],[437,431])).
% cnf(477,plain,(~epred2_2(X1,X2)),inference(csr,[status(thm)],[476,432])).
% cnf(478,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[394,477,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(479,negated_conjecture,($false),478,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses : 54
% # ...of these trivial : 0
% # ...subsumed : 0
% # ...remaining for further processing: 54
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed : 0
% # Backward-rewritten : 1
% # Generated clauses : 1
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1
% # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% # Paramodulations : 0
% # Factorizations : 0
% # Equation resolutions : 0
% # Current number of processed clauses: 52
% # Positive orientable unit clauses: 38
% # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% # Negative unit clauses : 4
% # Non-unit-clauses : 9
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 165
% # ...number of literals in the above : 789
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts : 7
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes : 3
% # Backwards rewriting index: 63 leaves, 1.06+/-0.302 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index: 40 leaves, 1.00+/-0.000 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index: 61 leaves, 1.03+/-0.178 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time : 0.030 s
% # System time : 0.005 s
% # Total time : 0.035 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.14 CPU 0.21 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.14 CPU 0.21 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP17727/SWV219+1.tptp
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------