TSTP Solution File: SWV189+1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SWV189+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May 5 10:28:21 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.55s 0.75s
% Output : Refutation 0.55s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 25 ( 13 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 71 ( 15 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 64 ( 18 ~; 12 |; 20 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 13 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 8 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 37 ( 33 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f300,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f299,f146]) ).
fof(f146,plain,
! [X0] : ~ gt(X0,X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X0] : ~ gt(X0,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.d39hwMax90/Vampire---4.8_15732',irreflexivity_gt) ).
fof(f299,plain,
gt(n0,n0),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f293,f180]) ).
fof(f180,plain,
n0 = plus(n1,tptp_minus_1),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f134,f168]) ).
fof(f168,plain,
! [X0] : succ(X0) = plus(n1,X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).
fof(f30,axiom,
! [X0] : succ(X0) = plus(n1,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.d39hwMax90/Vampire---4.8_15732',succ_plus_1_l) ).
fof(f134,plain,
n0 = succ(tptp_minus_1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).
fof(f28,axiom,
n0 = succ(tptp_minus_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.d39hwMax90/Vampire---4.8_15732',succ_tptp_minus_1) ).
fof(f293,plain,
gt(plus(n1,tptp_minus_1),n0),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f248,f177]) ).
fof(f177,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( gt(plus(n1,X1),X0)
| ~ leq(X0,X1) ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f122,f168]) ).
fof(f122,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( gt(succ(X1),X0)
| ~ leq(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).
fof(f13,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( leq(X0,X1)
<=> gt(succ(X1),X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.d39hwMax90/Vampire---4.8_15732',leq_succ_gt_equiv) ).
fof(f248,plain,
leq(n0,tptp_minus_1),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f114,f115,f126]) ).
fof(f126,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ leq(X1,X2)
| ~ leq(X0,X1)
| leq(X0,X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f98]) ).
fof(f98,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( leq(X0,X2)
| ~ leq(X1,X2)
| ~ leq(X0,X1) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f97]) ).
fof(f97,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( leq(X0,X2)
| ~ leq(X1,X2)
| ~ leq(X0,X1) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ( leq(X1,X2)
& leq(X0,X1) )
=> leq(X0,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.d39hwMax90/Vampire---4.8_15732',transitivity_leq) ).
fof(f115,plain,
leq(sK0,tptp_minus_1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f89]) ).
fof(f89,plain,
( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( init != a_select3(q_init,X1,X2)
& leq(X2,n4)
& leq(n0,X2) )
& leq(X1,tptp_minus_1)
& leq(n0,X1) )
& ! [X0] :
( init = a_select3(center_init,X0,n0)
| ~ leq(X0,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X0) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f88]) ).
fof(f88,plain,
( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( init != a_select3(q_init,X1,X2)
& leq(X2,n4)
& leq(n0,X2) )
& leq(X1,tptp_minus_1)
& leq(n0,X1) )
& ! [X0] :
( init = a_select3(center_init,X0,n0)
| ~ leq(X0,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X0) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f87]) ).
fof(f87,plain,
~ ( ! [X0] :
( ( leq(X0,n4)
& leq(n0,X0) )
=> init = a_select3(center_init,X0,n0) )
=> ! [X1] :
( ( leq(X1,tptp_minus_1)
& leq(n0,X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( ( leq(X2,n4)
& leq(n0,X2) )
=> init = a_select3(q_init,X1,X2) ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f54]) ).
fof(f54,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ! [X13] :
( ( leq(X13,n4)
& leq(n0,X13) )
=> a_select3(center_init,X13,n0) = init )
=> ! [X17] :
( ( leq(X17,tptp_minus_1)
& leq(n0,X17) )
=> ! [X3] :
( ( leq(X3,n4)
& leq(n0,X3) )
=> init = a_select3(q_init,X17,X3) ) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f53]) ).
fof(f53,conjecture,
( ! [X13] :
( ( leq(X13,n4)
& leq(n0,X13) )
=> a_select3(center_init,X13,n0) = init )
=> ! [X17] :
( ( leq(X17,tptp_minus_1)
& leq(n0,X17) )
=> ! [X3] :
( ( leq(X3,n4)
& leq(n0,X3) )
=> init = a_select3(q_init,X17,X3) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.d39hwMax90/Vampire---4.8_15732',cl5_nebula_init_0121) ).
fof(f114,plain,
leq(n0,sK0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f89]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13 % Problem : SWV189+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.12/0.15 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Fri May 3 21:10:38 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.36 This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.15/0.36 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.d39hwMax90/Vampire---4.8_15732
% 0.55/0.74 % (16105)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.55/0.74 % (16098)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.55/0.74 % (16100)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.55/0.74 % (16101)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.55/0.74 % (16099)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.55/0.74 % (16103)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.55/0.74 % (16102)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.55/0.74 % (16104)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.55/0.74 % (16105)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (16105)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.74 % (16105)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.55/0.74 % (16105)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.55/0.74
% 0.55/0.74 % (16105)Memory used [KB]: 1092
% 0.55/0.74 % (16105)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.55/0.74 % (16105)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.55/0.74 % (16105)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.74 % (16105)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.75 % (16111)lrs+21_1:16_sil=2000:sp=occurrence:urr=on:flr=on:i=55:sd=1:nm=0:ins=3:ss=included:rawr=on:br=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/55Mi)
% 0.55/0.75 % (16104)First to succeed.
% 0.55/0.75 % (16100)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.55/0.75 % (16104)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-15980"
% 0.55/0.75 % (16104)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.55/0.75 % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.55/0.75 % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.55/0.75 % (16104)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.75 % (16104)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.55/0.75 % (16104)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.55/0.75
% 0.55/0.75 % (16104)Memory used [KB]: 1167
% 0.55/0.75 % (16104)Time elapsed: 0.007 s
% 0.55/0.75 % (16104)Instructions burned: 9 (million)
% 0.55/0.75 % (15980)Success in time 0.379 s
% 0.55/0.75 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------