TSTP Solution File: SWV189+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWV189+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 18:15:31 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.23s 1.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 23 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 62 ( 11 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 59 ( 20 ~; 15 |; 13 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 11 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 8 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 0 sgn 21 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(cl5_nebula_init_0121,conjecture,
( ! [X14] :
( ( leq(n0,X14)
& leq(X14,n4) )
=> a_select3(center_init,X14,n0) = init )
=> ! [X18] :
( ( leq(n0,X18)
& leq(X18,tptp_minus_1) )
=> ! [X4] :
( ( leq(n0,X4)
& leq(X4,n4) )
=> a_select3(q_init,X18,X4) = init ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',cl5_nebula_init_0121) ).
fof(finite_domain_0,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ( leq(n0,X1)
& leq(X1,n0) )
=> X1 = n0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',finite_domain_0) ).
fof(leq_gt1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( gt(X2,X1)
=> leq(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',leq_gt1) ).
fof(transitivity_leq,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( leq(X1,X2)
& leq(X2,X3) )
=> leq(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',transitivity_leq) ).
fof(gt_0_tptp_minus_1,axiom,
gt(n0,tptp_minus_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',gt_0_tptp_minus_1) ).
fof(irreflexivity_gt,axiom,
! [X1] : ~ gt(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',irreflexivity_gt) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ! [X14] :
( ( leq(n0,X14)
& leq(X14,n4) )
=> a_select3(center_init,X14,n0) = init )
=> ! [X18] :
( ( leq(n0,X18)
& leq(X18,tptp_minus_1) )
=> ! [X4] :
( ( leq(n0,X4)
& leq(X4,n4) )
=> a_select3(q_init,X18,X4) = init ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cl5_nebula_init_0121]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ leq(n0,X2)
| ~ leq(X2,n0)
| X2 = n0 ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[finite_domain_0])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ gt(X4,X3)
| leq(X3,X4) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[leq_gt1])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ leq(X4,X5)
| ~ leq(X5,X6)
| leq(X4,X6) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[transitivity_leq])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
! [X19] :
( ( ~ leq(n0,X19)
| ~ leq(X19,n4)
| a_select3(center_init,X19,n0) = init )
& leq(n0,esk1_0)
& leq(esk1_0,tptp_minus_1)
& leq(n0,esk2_0)
& leq(esk2_0,n4)
& a_select3(q_init,esk1_0,esk2_0) != init ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( X1 = n0
| ~ leq(X1,n0)
| ~ leq(n0,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( leq(X1,X2)
| ~ gt(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( leq(X1,X2)
| ~ leq(X3,X2)
| ~ leq(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
leq(esk1_0,tptp_minus_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( X1 = n0
| ~ leq(n0,X1)
| ~ gt(n0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( leq(X1,tptp_minus_1)
| ~ leq(X1,esk1_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
gt(n0,tptp_minus_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[gt_0_tptp_minus_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
leq(n0,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
! [X2] : ~ gt(X2,X2),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[irreflexivity_gt])]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
n0 = tptp_minus_1,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
~ gt(X1,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_20]),c_0_21]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SWV189+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 17:14:37 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/1.41 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.41 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.23/1.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.017 s
% 0.23/1.41
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.41 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.41 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object total steps : 23
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object clause steps : 11
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object formula steps : 12
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object conjectures : 7
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object clause conjectures : 4
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object initial clauses used : 7
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object initial formulas used : 6
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object generating inferences : 3
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 5
% 0.23/1.41 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.41 # Parsed axioms : 85
% 0.23/1.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 29
% 0.23/1.41 # Initial clauses : 63
% 0.23/1.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.23/1.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 62
% 0.23/1.41 # Processed clauses : 147
% 0.23/1.41 # ...of these trivial : 4
% 0.23/1.41 # ...subsumed : 13
% 0.23/1.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 130
% 0.23/1.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Backward-rewritten : 53
% 0.23/1.41 # Generated clauses : 526
% 0.23/1.41 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 478
% 0.23/1.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 11
% 0.23/1.41 # Paramodulations : 523
% 0.23/1.41 # Factorizations : 3
% 0.23/1.41 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 77
% 0.23/1.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 41
% 0.23/1.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 0.23/1.41 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.23/1.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 30
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 205
% 0.23/1.41 # ...number of literals in the above : 484
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of archived clauses : 54
% 0.23/1.41 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 126
% 0.23/1.41 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 104
% 0.23/1.41 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 24
% 0.23/1.41 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 18
% 0.23/1.41 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # BW rewrite match attempts : 9
% 0.23/1.41 # BW rewrite match successes : 9
% 0.23/1.41 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Termbank termtop insertions : 7977
% 0.23/1.41
% 0.23/1.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.41 # User time : 0.026 s
% 0.23/1.41 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.23/1.41 # Total time : 0.031 s
% 0.23/1.41 # Maximum resident set size: 3692 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------