%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWV174+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:41:31 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.77s 0.93s
% Output   : Refutation 0.77s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : SWV174+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 12:38:39 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.77/0.93  
% 0.77/0.93  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.77/0.93  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.77/0.93  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.77/0.93  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.77/0.93  SPASS derived 2276 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 1 splits and kept 953 clauses.
% 0.77/0.93  SPASS allocated 87716 KBytes.
% 0.77/0.93  SPASS spent	0:00:00.55 on the problem.
% 0.77/0.93  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.77/0.93  		0:00:00.08 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.77/0.93  		0:00:00.02 for inferences.
% 0.77/0.93  		0:00:00.01 for the backtracking.
% 0.77/0.93  		0:00:00.29 for the reduction.
% 0.77/0.93  
% 0.77/0.93  
% 0.77/0.93  Here is a proof with depth 1, length 11 :
% 0.77/0.93  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.77/0.93  2[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(n0,skc3)*r.
% 0.77/0.93  4[0:Inp] ||  -> gt(pv10,skc3)*r.
% 0.77/0.93  7[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(skc2,n4)*l.
% 0.77/0.93  8[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(n0,skc2)*r.
% 0.77/0.93  69[0:Inp] || equal(a_select3(q_init,skc3,skc2),init)** -> .
% 0.77/0.93  82[0:Inp] || gt(u,v)*+ -> leq(v,pred(u))*.
% 0.77/0.93  125[0:Inp] || leq(u,n4) leq(v,pred(pv10)) leq(n0,u) leq(n0,v) -> equal(a_select3(q_init,v,u),init)**.
% 0.77/0.93  164[0:Res:125.4,69.0] || leq(n0,skc3) leq(skc3,pred(pv10))*r leq(n0,skc2) leq(skc2,n4) -> .
% 0.77/0.93  362[0:MRR:164.0,164.2,164.3,2.0,8.0,7.0] || leq(skc3,pred(pv10))*r -> .
% 0.77/0.93  3237[0:Res:4.0,82.0] ||  -> leq(skc3,pred(pv10))*r.
% 0.77/0.93  3366[0:MRR:3237.0,362.0] ||  -> .
% 0.77/0.93  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.77/0.93  Formulae used in the proof : cl5_nebula_init_0046 leq_gt_pred
% 0.77/0.93  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------