TSTP Solution File: SWV174+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SWV174+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 17:46:06 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.02s 2.61s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.02s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 11 unt; 0 nHn; 16 RR)
% Number of literals : 30 ( 5 equ; 16 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 8 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( a_select3(q_init,X1,X2) = init
| ~ leq(X2,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X2)
| ~ leq(n0,X1)
| ~ leq(X1,minus(pv10,n1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-su1eh28r/lgb.p',i_0_8) ).
cnf(i_0_51,plain,
( leq(X1,minus(X2,n1))
| ~ gt(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-su1eh28r/lgb.p',i_0_51) ).
cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
a_select3(q_init,esk1_0,esk2_0) != init,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-su1eh28r/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
gt(pv10,esk1_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-su1eh28r/lgb.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(i_0_3,negated_conjecture,
leq(esk2_0,n4),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-su1eh28r/lgb.p',i_0_3) ).
cnf(i_0_5,negated_conjecture,
leq(n0,esk2_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-su1eh28r/lgb.p',i_0_5) ).
cnf(i_0_6,negated_conjecture,
leq(n0,esk1_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-su1eh28r/lgb.p',i_0_6) ).
cnf(c_0_59,negated_conjecture,
( a_select3(q_init,X1,X2) = init
| ~ leq(X2,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X2)
| ~ leq(n0,X1)
| ~ leq(X1,minus(pv10,n1)) ),
i_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_60,plain,
( leq(X1,minus(X2,n1))
| ~ gt(X2,X1) ),
i_0_51 ).
cnf(c_0_61,negated_conjecture,
a_select3(q_init,esk1_0,esk2_0) != init,
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_62,plain,
( a_select3(q_init,X1,X2) = init
| ~ gt(pv10,X1)
| ~ leq(X2,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X2)
| ~ leq(n0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_59,c_0_60]) ).
cnf(c_0_63,negated_conjecture,
gt(pv10,esk1_0),
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_64,negated_conjecture,
leq(esk2_0,n4),
i_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_65,negated_conjecture,
leq(n0,esk2_0),
i_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_66,negated_conjecture,
leq(n0,esk1_0),
i_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_67,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_61,c_0_62]),c_0_63]),c_0_64]),c_0_65]),c_0_66])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : SWV174+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.14 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 13:23:28 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.20/0.48 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.48 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.20/0.48 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.20/0.48 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 8.02/2.61 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.02/2.61 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.02/2.61 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.02/2.61 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 8.02/2.61 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 8.02/2.61 #
% 8.02/2.61 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 8.02/2.61 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.02/2.61
% 8.02/2.61 # Proof found!
% 8.02/2.61 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.02/2.61 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.02/2.61 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.02/2.61
% 8.02/2.61 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.02/2.61 # User time : 0.074 s
% 8.02/2.61 # System time : 0.011 s
% 8.02/2.61 # Total time : 0.085 s
% 8.02/2.61 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 8.02/2.61
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------