TSTP Solution File: SWV174+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWV174+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 18:15:28 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.26s 1.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 68 ( 11 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 16 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 71 ( 17 ~; 13 |; 28 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 12 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 14 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 9 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 23 ( 2 sgn 19 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(cl5_nebula_init_0046,conjecture,
( ( leq(n0,pv10)
& leq(pv10,n135299)
& ! [X14] :
( ( leq(n0,X14)
& leq(X14,pred(pv10)) )
=> ! [X18] :
( ( leq(n0,X18)
& leq(X18,n4) )
=> a_select3(q_init,X14,X18) = init ) )
& ! [X4] :
( ( leq(n0,X4)
& leq(X4,n4) )
=> a_select3(center_init,X4,n0) = init ) )
=> ! [X20,X21] :
( ( leq(n0,X20)
& leq(n0,X21)
& leq(X20,n135299)
& leq(X21,n4) )
=> ( gt(pv10,X20)
=> a_select3(q_init,X20,X21) = init ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',cl5_nebula_init_0046) ).
fof(leq_gt_pred,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( leq(X1,pred(X2))
<=> gt(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',leq_gt_pred) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( leq(n0,pv10)
& leq(pv10,n135299)
& ! [X14] :
( ( leq(n0,X14)
& leq(X14,pred(pv10)) )
=> ! [X18] :
( ( leq(n0,X18)
& leq(X18,n4) )
=> a_select3(q_init,X14,X18) = init ) )
& ! [X4] :
( ( leq(n0,X4)
& leq(X4,n4) )
=> a_select3(center_init,X4,n0) = init ) )
=> ! [X20,X21] :
( ( leq(n0,X20)
& leq(n0,X21)
& leq(X20,n135299)
& leq(X21,n4) )
=> ( gt(pv10,X20)
=> a_select3(q_init,X20,X21) = init ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cl5_nebula_init_0046]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X22,X23,X24] :
( leq(n0,pv10)
& leq(pv10,n135299)
& ( ~ leq(n0,X22)
| ~ leq(X22,pred(pv10))
| ~ leq(n0,X23)
| ~ leq(X23,n4)
| a_select3(q_init,X22,X23) = init )
& ( ~ leq(n0,X24)
| ~ leq(X24,n4)
| a_select3(center_init,X24,n0) = init )
& leq(n0,esk1_0)
& leq(n0,esk2_0)
& leq(esk1_0,n135299)
& leq(esk2_0,n4)
& gt(pv10,esk1_0)
& a_select3(q_init,esk1_0,esk2_0) != init ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
a_select3(q_init,esk1_0,esk2_0) != init,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( a_select3(q_init,X1,X2) = init
| ~ leq(X2,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X2)
| ~ leq(X1,pred(pv10))
| ~ leq(n0,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
leq(esk2_0,n4),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
leq(n0,esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
leq(n0,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X3,X4,X3,X4] :
( ( ~ leq(X3,pred(X4))
| gt(X4,X3) )
& ( ~ gt(X4,X3)
| leq(X3,pred(X4)) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[leq_gt_pred])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ leq(esk1_0,pred(pv10)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_6]),c_0_7]),c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( leq(X1,pred(X2))
| ~ gt(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
gt(pv10,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : SWV174+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 13:11:50 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.26/1.43 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.26/1.43 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.26/1.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.019 s
% 0.26/1.43
% 0.26/1.43 # Proof found!
% 0.26/1.43 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.26/1.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/1.43 # Proof object total steps : 14
% 0.26/1.43 # Proof object clause steps : 9
% 0.26/1.43 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 0.26/1.43 # Proof object conjectures : 11
% 0.26/1.43 # Proof object clause conjectures : 8
% 0.26/1.43 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.26/1.43 # Proof object initial clauses used : 7
% 0.26/1.43 # Proof object initial formulas used : 2
% 0.26/1.43 # Proof object generating inferences : 2
% 0.26/1.43 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 6
% 0.26/1.43 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.26/1.43 # Parsed axioms : 92
% 0.26/1.43 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 26
% 0.26/1.43 # Initial clauses : 78
% 0.26/1.43 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.26/1.43 # Initial clauses in saturation : 77
% 0.26/1.43 # Processed clauses : 81
% 0.26/1.43 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.26/1.43 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.26/1.43 # ...remaining for further processing : 81
% 0.26/1.43 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.26/1.43 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.26/1.43 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.26/1.43 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.26/1.43 # Generated clauses : 204
% 0.26/1.43 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 181
% 0.26/1.43 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.26/1.43 # Paramodulations : 202
% 0.26/1.43 # Factorizations : 2
% 0.26/1.43 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.26/1.43 # Current number of processed clauses : 78
% 0.26/1.43 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 50
% 0.26/1.43 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 0.26/1.43 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.26/1.43 # Non-unit-clauses : 22
% 0.26/1.43 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 168
% 0.26/1.43 # ...number of literals in the above : 360
% 0.26/1.43 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.26/1.43 # Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.26/1.43 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 32
% 0.26/1.43 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12
% 0.26/1.43 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.26/1.43 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 19
% 0.26/1.43 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.26/1.43 # BW rewrite match attempts : 14
% 0.26/1.43 # BW rewrite match successes : 14
% 0.26/1.43 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.26/1.43 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.26/1.43 # Termbank termtop insertions : 5847
% 0.26/1.43
% 0.26/1.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/1.43 # User time : 0.024 s
% 0.26/1.43 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.26/1.43 # Total time : 0.025 s
% 0.26/1.43 # Maximum resident set size: 3460 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------