TSTP Solution File: SWV169+1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SWV169+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 05:33:31 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 15 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 141 ( 26 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 37 ( 9 avg)
% Number of connectives : 163 ( 37 ~; 34 |; 67 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 24 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 23 ( 7 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 9 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 0 sgn 28 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(cl5_nebula_init_0021,conjecture,
( ( leq(n0,pv10)
& leq(n0,pv11)
& leq(n0,pv65)
& leq(pv10,n135299)
& leq(pv11,n4)
& leq(pv65,n4)
& ! [X14,X18] :
( ( leq(n0,X14)
& leq(n0,X18)
& leq(X14,n135299)
& leq(X18,n4) )
=> ( ( X14 = pv10
& gt(pv11,X18) )
=> a_select3(q_init,X14,X18) = init ) )
& ! [X4,X20] :
( ( leq(n0,X4)
& leq(n0,X20)
& leq(X4,n135299)
& leq(X20,n4) )
=> ( gt(pv10,X4)
=> a_select3(q_init,X4,X20) = init ) )
& ! [X21] :
( ( leq(n0,X21)
& leq(X21,pred(pv10)) )
=> ! [X22] :
( ( leq(n0,X22)
& leq(X22,n4) )
=> a_select3(q_init,X21,X22) = init ) )
& ! [X28] :
( ( leq(n0,X28)
& leq(X28,n4) )
=> a_select3(center_init,X28,n0) = init ) )
=> a_select3(center_init,pv65,n0) = init ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cl5_nebula_init_0021) ).
fof(c_0_1,plain,
( epred1_0
<=> ( leq(n0,pv10)
& leq(n0,pv11)
& leq(n0,pv65)
& leq(pv10,n135299)
& leq(pv11,n4)
& leq(pv65,n4)
& ! [X14,X18] :
( ( leq(n0,X14)
& leq(n0,X18)
& leq(X14,n135299)
& leq(X18,n4) )
=> ( ( X14 = pv10
& gt(pv11,X18) )
=> a_select3(q_init,X14,X18) = init ) )
& ! [X4,X20] :
( ( leq(n0,X4)
& leq(n0,X20)
& leq(X4,n135299)
& leq(X20,n4) )
=> ( gt(pv10,X4)
=> a_select3(q_init,X4,X20) = init ) )
& ! [X21] :
( ( leq(n0,X21)
& leq(X21,pred(pv10)) )
=> ! [X22] :
( ( leq(n0,X22)
& leq(X22,n4) )
=> a_select3(q_init,X21,X22) = init ) )
& ! [X28] :
( ( leq(n0,X28)
& leq(X28,n4) )
=> a_select3(center_init,X28,n0) = init ) ) ),
introduced(definition) ).
fof(c_0_2,plain,
( epred1_0
=> ( leq(n0,pv10)
& leq(n0,pv11)
& leq(n0,pv65)
& leq(pv10,n135299)
& leq(pv11,n4)
& leq(pv65,n4)
& ! [X14,X18] :
( ( leq(n0,X14)
& leq(n0,X18)
& leq(X14,n135299)
& leq(X18,n4) )
=> ( ( X14 = pv10
& gt(pv11,X18) )
=> a_select3(q_init,X14,X18) = init ) )
& ! [X4,X20] :
( ( leq(n0,X4)
& leq(n0,X20)
& leq(X4,n135299)
& leq(X20,n4) )
=> ( gt(pv10,X4)
=> a_select3(q_init,X4,X20) = init ) )
& ! [X21] :
( ( leq(n0,X21)
& leq(X21,pred(pv10)) )
=> ! [X22] :
( ( leq(n0,X22)
& leq(X22,n4) )
=> a_select3(q_init,X21,X22) = init ) )
& ! [X28] :
( ( leq(n0,X28)
& leq(X28,n4) )
=> a_select3(center_init,X28,n0) = init ) ) ),
inference(split_equiv,[status(thm)],[c_0_1]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ( epred1_0
=> a_select3(center_init,pv65,n0) = init ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cl5_nebula_init_0021]),c_0_1]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X72,X73,X74,X75,X76,X77,X78] :
( ( leq(n0,pv10)
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( leq(n0,pv11)
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( leq(n0,pv65)
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( leq(pv10,n135299)
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( leq(pv11,n4)
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( leq(pv65,n4)
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( ~ leq(n0,X72)
| ~ leq(n0,X73)
| ~ leq(X72,n135299)
| ~ leq(X73,n4)
| X72 != pv10
| ~ gt(pv11,X73)
| a_select3(q_init,X72,X73) = init
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( ~ leq(n0,X74)
| ~ leq(n0,X75)
| ~ leq(X74,n135299)
| ~ leq(X75,n4)
| ~ gt(pv10,X74)
| a_select3(q_init,X74,X75) = init
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( ~ leq(n0,X76)
| ~ leq(X76,pred(pv10))
| ~ leq(n0,X77)
| ~ leq(X77,n4)
| a_select3(q_init,X76,X77) = init
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( ~ leq(n0,X78)
| ~ leq(X78,n4)
| a_select3(center_init,X78,n0) = init
| ~ epred1_0 ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( epred1_0
& a_select3(center_init,pv65,n0) != init ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( a_select3(center_init,X1,n0) = init
| ~ leq(n0,X1)
| ~ leq(X1,n4)
| ~ epred1_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
epred1_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( leq(pv65,n4)
| ~ epred1_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( leq(n0,pv65)
| ~ epred1_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( a_select3(center_init,X1,n0) = init
| ~ leq(X1,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
leq(pv65,n4),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_7])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
leq(n0,pv65),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_7])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
a_select3(center_init,pv65,n0) != init,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),c_0_13]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWV169+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sun May 19 09:01:23 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.49 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # new_bool_3 with pid 25893 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.49 # Search class: FGUSM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 23s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S4S with pid 25896 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Result found by G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S4S
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.49 # Search class: FGUSM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 23s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.49 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 92
% 0.20/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 26
% 0.20/0.49 # Initial clauses : 80
% 0.20/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 80
% 0.20/0.49 # Processed clauses : 133
% 0.20/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 133
% 0.20/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Generated clauses : 47
% 0.20/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 36
% 0.20/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Paramodulations : 47
% 0.20/0.49 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 33
% 0.20/0.49 # ...of those cached : 21
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 53
% 0.20/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 49
% 0.20/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.20/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 63
% 0.20/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 121
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 80
% 0.20/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 88
% 0.20/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 29
% 0.20/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.20/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4756
% 0.20/0.49 # Search garbage collected termcells : 769
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49 # User time : 0.007 s
% 0.20/0.49 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 2076 pages
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49 # User time : 0.009 s
% 0.20/0.49 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Total time : 0.017 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1824 pages
% 0.20/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------