TSTP Solution File: SWV165+1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : SWV165+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.gFWVv4tK2D true
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 00:08:08 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.94s 0.80s
% Output : Refutation 0.94s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 13
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 28 ( 11 unt; 7 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 37 ( 6 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 86 ( 10 ~; 7 |; 4 &; 60 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 5 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 4 ( 4 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 9 ( 7 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 17 ( 0 ^; 17 !; 0 ?; 17 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(uninit_type,type,
uninit: $i ).
thf(tptp_minus_1_type,type,
tptp_minus_1: $i ).
thf(leq_type,type,
leq: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(gt_type,type,
gt: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(init_type,type,
init: $i ).
thf(sk__27_type,type,
sk__27: $i ).
thf(n0_type,type,
n0: $i ).
thf(gt_0_tptp_minus_1,axiom,
gt @ n0 @ tptp_minus_1 ).
thf(zip_derived_cl125,plain,
gt @ n0 @ tptp_minus_1,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[gt_0_tptp_minus_1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl125_001,plain,
gt @ n0 @ tptp_minus_1,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[gt_0_tptp_minus_1]) ).
thf(leq_gt1,axiom,
! [X: $i,Y: $i] :
( ( gt @ Y @ X )
=> ( leq @ X @ Y ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl9,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( leq @ X0 @ X1 )
| ~ ( gt @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[leq_gt1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl966,plain,
leq @ tptp_minus_1 @ n0,
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl125,zip_derived_cl9]) ).
thf(finite_domain_0,axiom,
! [X: $i] :
( ( ( leq @ n0 @ X )
& ( leq @ X @ n0 ) )
=> ( X = n0 ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl145,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( X0 = n0 )
| ~ ( leq @ X0 @ n0 )
| ~ ( leq @ n0 @ X0 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[finite_domain_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl972,plain,
( ( tptp_minus_1 = n0 )
| ~ ( leq @ n0 @ tptp_minus_1 ) ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl966,zip_derived_cl145]) ).
thf(cl5_nebula_init_0001,conjecture,
! [A: $i] :
( ( ( leq @ n0 @ A )
& ( leq @ A @ tptp_minus_1 ) )
=> ( uninit = init ) ) ).
thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: $i] :
( ( ( leq @ n0 @ A )
& ( leq @ A @ tptp_minus_1 ) )
=> ( uninit = init ) ),
inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[cl5_nebula_init_0001]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl119,plain,
leq @ sk__27 @ tptp_minus_1,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl120,plain,
leq @ n0 @ sk__27,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(transitivity_leq,axiom,
! [X: $i,Y: $i,Z: $i] :
( ( ( leq @ X @ Y )
& ( leq @ Y @ Z ) )
=> ( leq @ X @ Z ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl4,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ~ ( leq @ X0 @ X1 )
| ~ ( leq @ X1 @ X2 )
| ( leq @ X0 @ X2 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[transitivity_leq]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl954,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ ( leq @ sk__27 @ X0 )
| ( leq @ n0 @ X0 ) ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl120,zip_derived_cl4]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl970,plain,
leq @ n0 @ tptp_minus_1,
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl119,zip_derived_cl954]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl981,plain,
tptp_minus_1 = n0,
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl972,zip_derived_cl970]) ).
thf(irreflexivity_gt,axiom,
! [X: $i] :
~ ( gt @ X @ X ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl2,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
~ ( gt @ X0 @ X0 ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[irreflexivity_gt]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl988,plain,
$false,
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl125,zip_derived_cl981,zip_derived_cl2]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SWV165+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.gFWVv4tK2D true
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 06:53:46 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.21/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.21/0.35 % Running in FO mode
% 0.58/0.64 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.58/0.64 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.58/0.64 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.58/0.70 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.86/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.86/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.86/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.86/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.86/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.94/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.94/0.80 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.94/0.80 % BCE start: 154
% 0.94/0.80 % BCE eliminated: 1
% 0.94/0.80 % PE start: 153
% 0.94/0.80 logic: eq
% 0.94/0.80 % PE eliminated: 13
% 0.94/0.80 % done 24 iterations in 0.068s
% 0.94/0.80 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.94/0.80 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.94/0.80
% 0.94/0.80
% 0.94/0.80 % Terminating...
% 1.88/0.85 % Runner terminated.
% 1.88/0.86 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------