TSTP Solution File: SWV165+1 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : SWV165+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : art11.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory : 2006MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Dec 26 12:25:27 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 0.21s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 46 ( 27 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 78 ( 16 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 59 ( 27 ~; 17 |; 11 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 50 ( 0 sgn 26 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(3,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( leq(X1,X2)
& leq(X2,X3) )
=> leq(X1,X3) ),
file('/tmp/tmp_Gdm7Y/sel_SWV165+1.p_1',transitivity_leq) ).
fof(6,axiom,
! [X1] : plus(n1,X1) = succ(X1),
file('/tmp/tmp_Gdm7Y/sel_SWV165+1.p_1',succ_plus_1_l) ).
fof(11,axiom,
succ(tptp_minus_1) = n0,
file('/tmp/tmp_Gdm7Y/sel_SWV165+1.p_1',succ_tptp_minus_1) ).
fof(14,axiom,
! [X1] : plus(X1,n1) = succ(X1),
file('/tmp/tmp_Gdm7Y/sel_SWV165+1.p_1',succ_plus_1_r) ).
fof(15,axiom,
! [X1] : ~ gt(X1,X1),
file('/tmp/tmp_Gdm7Y/sel_SWV165+1.p_1',irreflexivity_gt) ).
fof(16,axiom,
! [X1] : gt(succ(X1),X1),
file('/tmp/tmp_Gdm7Y/sel_SWV165+1.p_1',gt_succ) ).
fof(21,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( leq(X1,X2)
<=> gt(succ(X2),X1) ),
file('/tmp/tmp_Gdm7Y/sel_SWV165+1.p_1',leq_succ_gt_equiv) ).
fof(34,conjecture,
! [X4] :
( ( leq(n0,X4)
& leq(X4,tptp_minus_1) )
=> uninit = init ),
file('/tmp/tmp_Gdm7Y/sel_SWV165+1.p_1',cl5_nebula_init_0001) ).
fof(57,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X4] :
( ( leq(n0,X4)
& leq(X4,tptp_minus_1) )
=> uninit = init ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[34]) ).
fof(58,plain,
! [X1] : ~ gt(X1,X1),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[15,theory(equality)]) ).
fof(64,plain,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ~ leq(X1,X2)
| ~ leq(X2,X3)
| leq(X1,X3) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
fof(65,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ leq(X4,X5)
| ~ leq(X5,X6)
| leq(X4,X6) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[64]) ).
cnf(66,plain,
( leq(X1,X2)
| ~ leq(X3,X2)
| ~ leq(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[65]) ).
fof(73,plain,
! [X2] : plus(n1,X2) = succ(X2),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
cnf(74,plain,
plus(n1,X1) = succ(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[73]) ).
cnf(85,plain,
succ(tptp_minus_1) = n0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
fof(90,plain,
! [X2] : plus(X2,n1) = succ(X2),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[14]) ).
cnf(91,plain,
plus(X1,n1) = succ(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[90]) ).
fof(92,plain,
! [X2] : ~ gt(X2,X2),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[58]) ).
cnf(93,plain,
~ gt(X1,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[92]) ).
fof(94,plain,
! [X2] : gt(succ(X2),X2),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[16]) ).
cnf(95,plain,
gt(succ(X1),X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[94]) ).
fof(104,plain,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( ~ leq(X1,X2)
| gt(succ(X2),X1) )
& ( ~ gt(succ(X2),X1)
| leq(X1,X2) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[21]) ).
fof(105,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( ~ leq(X3,X4)
| gt(succ(X4),X3) )
& ( ~ gt(succ(X4),X3)
| leq(X3,X4) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[104]) ).
cnf(106,plain,
( leq(X1,X2)
| ~ gt(succ(X2),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[105]) ).
cnf(107,plain,
( gt(succ(X1),X2)
| ~ leq(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[105]) ).
fof(124,negated_conjecture,
? [X4] :
( leq(n0,X4)
& leq(X4,tptp_minus_1)
& uninit != init ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[57]) ).
fof(125,negated_conjecture,
? [X5] :
( leq(n0,X5)
& leq(X5,tptp_minus_1)
& uninit != init ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[124]) ).
fof(126,negated_conjecture,
( leq(n0,esk1_0)
& leq(esk1_0,tptp_minus_1)
& uninit != init ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[125]) ).
cnf(128,negated_conjecture,
leq(esk1_0,tptp_minus_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[126]) ).
cnf(129,negated_conjecture,
leq(n0,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[126]) ).
cnf(164,plain,
plus(tptp_minus_1,n1) = n0,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[85,91,theory(equality)]),
[unfolding] ).
cnf(166,plain,
plus(n1,X1) = plus(X1,n1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[74,91,theory(equality)]),
[unfolding] ).
cnf(168,plain,
gt(plus(X1,n1),X1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[95,91,theory(equality)]),
[unfolding] ).
cnf(180,plain,
( leq(X1,X2)
| ~ gt(plus(X2,n1),X1) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[106,91,theory(equality)]),
[unfolding] ).
cnf(183,plain,
( gt(plus(X1,n1),X2)
| ~ leq(X2,X1) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[107,91,theory(equality)]),
[unfolding] ).
cnf(187,negated_conjecture,
( leq(X1,esk1_0)
| ~ leq(X1,n0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[66,129,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(188,negated_conjecture,
( leq(X1,tptp_minus_1)
| ~ leq(X1,esk1_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[66,128,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(204,plain,
plus(n1,tptp_minus_1) = n0,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[164,166,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(213,plain,
~ leq(plus(X1,n1),X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[93,183,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(214,plain,
leq(X1,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[180,168,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(385,negated_conjecture,
( leq(X1,tptp_minus_1)
| ~ leq(X1,n0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[188,187,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(389,negated_conjecture,
~ leq(plus(tptp_minus_1,n1),n0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[213,385,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(393,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[389,166,theory(equality)]),204,theory(equality)]),214,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(394,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[393,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(395,negated_conjecture,
$false,
394,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/SInE---0.4/Source/sine.py:10: DeprecationWarning: the sets module is deprecated
% from sets import Set
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SWV/SWV165+1.p
% --creating new selector for [SWV003+0.ax]
% -running prover on /tmp/tmp_Gdm7Y/sel_SWV165+1.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem SWV165+1.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SWV/SWV165+1.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SWV/SWV165+1.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------