%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWV156+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:41:27 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.70s 0.92s
% Output   : Refutation 0.70s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem  : SWV156+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 07:02:19 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.70/0.92  
% 0.70/0.92  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.70/0.92  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.70/0.92  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.70/0.92  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.70/0.92  SPASS derived 2260 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 2 splits and kept 965 clauses.
% 0.70/0.92  SPASS allocated 87903 KBytes.
% 0.70/0.92  SPASS spent	0:00:00.54 on the problem.
% 0.70/0.92  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.70/0.92  		0:00:00.07 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.70/0.92  		0:00:00.02 for inferences.
% 0.70/0.92  		0:00:00.01 for the backtracking.
% 0.70/0.92  		0:00:00.27 for the reduction.
% 0.70/0.92  
% 0.70/0.92  
% 0.70/0.92  Here is a proof with depth 1, length 7 :
% 0.70/0.92  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.70/0.92  35[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(pv10,pred(pv10))*r.
% 0.70/0.92  37[0:Inp] || gt(u,u)* -> .
% 0.70/0.92  59[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(succ(pred(u)),u)**.
% 0.70/0.92  81[0:Inp] || leq(u,v)*+ -> gt(succ(v),u)*.
% 0.70/0.92  3323[0:Res:35.0,81.0] ||  -> gt(succ(pred(pv10)),pv10)*l.
% 0.70/0.92  3404[0:Rew:59.0,3323.0] ||  -> gt(pv10,pv10)*.
% 0.70/0.92  3405[0:MRR:3404.0,37.0] ||  -> .
% 0.70/0.92  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.70/0.92  Formulae used in the proof : cl5_nebula_norm_0006 irreflexivity_gt succ_pred leq_succ_gt_equiv
% 0.70/0.92  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------