TSTP Solution File: SWV153+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SWV153+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 17:46:02 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.91s 2.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.91s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   21 (  14 unt;   2 nHn;  21 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   33 (  12 equ;  15 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   18 (  18 usr;  11 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_51,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | gt(X2,X1)
    | ~ leq(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qz7m7wqx/lgb.p',i_0_51) ).

cnf(i_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    leq(esk1_0,pv12),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qz7m7wqx/lgb.p',i_0_3) ).

cnf(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    esk1_0 != pv12,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qz7m7wqx/lgb.p',i_0_2) ).

cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    divide(sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,esk1_0,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,esk1_0,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))),sum(n0,n4,sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))))) != a_select3(q,pv10,esk1_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qz7m7wqx/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).

cnf(i_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    sum(n0,n4,sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10))))) = pv70,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qz7m7wqx/lgb.p',i_0_11) ).

cnf(i_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( divide(sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,X1,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,X1,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))),sum(n0,n4,sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))))) = a_select3(q,pv10,X1)
    | ~ leq(n0,X1)
    | ~ leq(X1,minus(pv12,n1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qz7m7wqx/lgb.p',i_0_6) ).

cnf(i_0_52,plain,
    ( leq(X1,minus(X2,n1))
    | ~ gt(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qz7m7wqx/lgb.p',i_0_52) ).

cnf(i_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    leq(n0,esk1_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qz7m7wqx/lgb.p',i_0_4) ).

cnf(c_0_61,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | gt(X2,X1)
    | ~ leq(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_51 ).

cnf(c_0_62,negated_conjecture,
    leq(esk1_0,pv12),
    i_0_3 ).

cnf(c_0_63,negated_conjecture,
    esk1_0 != pv12,
    i_0_2 ).

cnf(c_0_64,negated_conjecture,
    divide(sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,esk1_0,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,esk1_0,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))),sum(n0,n4,sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))))) != a_select3(q,pv10,esk1_0),
    i_0_1 ).

cnf(c_0_65,negated_conjecture,
    sum(n0,n4,sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10))))) = pv70,
    i_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_66,negated_conjecture,
    ( divide(sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,X1,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,X1,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))),sum(n0,n4,sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))))) = a_select3(q,pv10,X1)
    | ~ leq(n0,X1)
    | ~ leq(X1,minus(pv12,n1)) ),
    i_0_6 ).

cnf(c_0_67,plain,
    ( leq(X1,minus(X2,n1))
    | ~ gt(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_52 ).

cnf(c_0_68,negated_conjecture,
    gt(pv12,esk1_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_61,c_0_62]),c_0_63]) ).

cnf(c_0_69,negated_conjecture,
    divide(sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,esk1_0,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,esk1_0,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))),pv70) != a_select3(q,pv10,esk1_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_65]) ).

cnf(c_0_70,negated_conjecture,
    ( divide(sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,X1,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,X1,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))),pv70) = a_select3(q,pv10,X1)
    | ~ leq(X1,minus(pv12,n1))
    | ~ leq(n0,X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_66,c_0_65]) ).

cnf(c_0_71,plain,
    leq(esk1_0,minus(pv12,n1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_67,c_0_68]) ).

cnf(c_0_72,negated_conjecture,
    leq(n0,esk1_0),
    i_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_73,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_69,c_0_70]),c_0_71]),c_0_72])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SWV153+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 04:46:30 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.20/0.45  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.20/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.20/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 7.91/2.42  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.91/2.42  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.91/2.42  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.91/2.42  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.91/2.42  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.91/2.42  #
% 7.91/2.42  # Preprocessing time       : 0.023 s
% 7.91/2.42  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.91/2.42  
% 7.91/2.42  # Proof found!
% 7.91/2.42  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.91/2.42  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.91/2.42  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.91/2.42  
% 7.91/2.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.91/2.42  # User time                : 0.029 s
% 7.91/2.42  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 7.91/2.42  # Total time               : 0.035 s
% 7.91/2.42  # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 7.91/2.42  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------