TSTP Solution File: SWV137+1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SWV137+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 05:54:09 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.44s 0.62s
% Output : Refutation 0.44s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 24 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 70 ( 5 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 11 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 60 ( 14 ~; 4 |; 38 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 9 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 12 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f185,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f184,f126]) ).
fof(f126,plain,
leq(n2,pv1325),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f93]) ).
fof(f93,plain,
( ~ leq(n0,pv1325)
& leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_worst7))
& leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_best7))
& leq(pv1325,n3)
& leq(s_worst7,n3)
& leq(s_sworst7,n3)
& leq(s_best7,n3)
& leq(n2,pv1325)
& leq(n0,s_worst7)
& leq(n0,s_sworst7)
& leq(n0,s_best7) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f92]) ).
fof(f92,plain,
( ~ leq(n0,pv1325)
& leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_worst7))
& leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_best7))
& leq(pv1325,n3)
& leq(s_worst7,n3)
& leq(s_sworst7,n3)
& leq(s_best7,n3)
& leq(n2,pv1325)
& leq(n0,s_worst7)
& leq(n0,s_sworst7)
& leq(n0,s_best7) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f54]) ).
fof(f54,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_worst7))
& leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_best7))
& leq(pv1325,n3)
& leq(s_worst7,n3)
& leq(s_sworst7,n3)
& leq(s_best7,n3)
& leq(n2,pv1325)
& leq(n0,s_worst7)
& leq(n0,s_sworst7)
& leq(n0,s_best7) )
=> leq(n0,pv1325) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f53]) ).
fof(f53,conjecture,
( ( leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_worst7))
& leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_best7))
& leq(pv1325,n3)
& leq(s_worst7,n3)
& leq(s_sworst7,n3)
& leq(s_best7,n3)
& leq(n2,pv1325)
& leq(n0,s_worst7)
& leq(n0,s_sworst7)
& leq(n0,s_best7) )
=> leq(n0,pv1325) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',gauss_array_0007) ).
fof(f184,plain,
~ leq(n2,pv1325),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f183,f170]) ).
fof(f170,plain,
n2 = succ(n1),
inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f143,f160]) ).
fof(f160,plain,
n1 = succ(n0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f84]) ).
fof(f84,axiom,
n1 = succ(n0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',successor_1) ).
fof(f143,plain,
n2 = succ(succ(n0)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f85]) ).
fof(f85,axiom,
n2 = succ(succ(n0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',successor_2) ).
fof(f183,plain,
~ leq(succ(n1),pv1325),
inference(resolution,[],[f178,f153]) ).
fof(f153,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( gt(X1,X0)
| ~ leq(succ(X0),X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f110]) ).
fof(f110,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( gt(X1,X0)
| ~ leq(succ(X0),X1) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f43]) ).
fof(f43,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( leq(succ(X0),X1)
=> gt(X1,X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',leq_succ_gt) ).
fof(f178,plain,
~ gt(pv1325,n1),
inference(resolution,[],[f177,f164]) ).
fof(f164,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( leq(X0,X1)
| ~ gt(X1,X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f116]) ).
fof(f116,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( leq(X0,X1)
| ~ gt(X1,X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).
fof(f8,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( gt(X1,X0)
=> leq(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',leq_gt1) ).
fof(f177,plain,
~ leq(n1,pv1325),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f176,f160]) ).
fof(f176,plain,
~ leq(succ(n0),pv1325),
inference(resolution,[],[f153,f174]) ).
fof(f174,plain,
~ gt(pv1325,n0),
inference(resolution,[],[f164,f133]) ).
fof(f133,plain,
~ leq(n0,pv1325),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f93]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.08 % Problem : SWV137+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.05/0.09 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.08/0.28 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.28 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.28 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.28 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.28 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.28 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.28 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.28 % DateTime : Sun May 19 08:45:07 EDT 2024
% 0.08/0.28 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.28 This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.08/0.28 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/0.62 % (27762)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.39/0.62 % (27763)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.39/0.62 % (27764)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.44/0.62 % (27765)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.44/0.62 % (27766)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.44/0.62 % (27767)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.44/0.62 % (27760)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.44/0.62 % (27762)First to succeed.
% 0.44/0.62 % (27762)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-27759"
% 0.44/0.62 % (27762)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.44/0.62 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.44/0.62 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.44/0.62 % (27762)------------------------------
% 0.44/0.62 % (27762)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.44/0.62 % (27762)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.44/0.62
% 0.44/0.62 % (27762)Memory used [KB]: 1116
% 0.44/0.62 % (27762)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.44/0.62 % (27762)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.44/0.62 % (27759)Success in time 0.331 s
% 0.44/0.62 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------