TSTP Solution File: SWV134+1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : SWV134+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:55:37 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.57s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   30 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   85 (   8 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   71 (  16   ~;   8   |;  42   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   9 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   21 (  21   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1061,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f1060,f357]) ).

fof(f357,plain,
    ~ leq(n0,pv1325),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f125]) ).

fof(f125,plain,
    ( leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_best7))
    & leq(s_sworst7,n3)
    & leq(s_best7,n3)
    & ~ leq(n0,pv1325)
    & leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_sworst7))
    & leq(n0,s_best7)
    & ~ leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_worst7))
    & leq(n0,s_worst7)
    & leq(n0,s_sworst7)
    & leq(pv1325,n3)
    & leq(n2,pv1325)
    & leq(s_worst7,n3) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f124]) ).

fof(f124,plain,
    ( ~ leq(n0,pv1325)
    & leq(s_sworst7,n3)
    & leq(s_best7,n3)
    & leq(n0,s_worst7)
    & leq(s_worst7,n3)
    & ~ leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_worst7))
    & leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_sworst7))
    & leq(n2,pv1325)
    & leq(n0,s_sworst7)
    & leq(n0,s_best7)
    & leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_best7))
    & leq(pv1325,n3) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f54]) ).

fof(f54,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( leq(s_sworst7,n3)
        & leq(s_best7,n3)
        & leq(n0,s_worst7)
        & leq(s_worst7,n3)
        & ~ leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_worst7))
        & leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_sworst7))
        & leq(n2,pv1325)
        & leq(n0,s_sworst7)
        & leq(n0,s_best7)
        & leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_best7))
        & leq(pv1325,n3) )
     => leq(n0,pv1325) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f53]) ).

fof(f53,conjecture,
    ( ( leq(s_sworst7,n3)
      & leq(s_best7,n3)
      & leq(n0,s_worst7)
      & leq(s_worst7,n3)
      & ~ leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_worst7))
      & leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_sworst7))
      & leq(n2,pv1325)
      & leq(n0,s_sworst7)
      & leq(n0,s_best7)
      & leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_best7))
      & leq(pv1325,n3) )
   => leq(n0,pv1325) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',gauss_array_0004) ).

fof(f1060,plain,
    leq(n0,pv1325),
    inference(resolution,[],[f1059,f236]) ).

fof(f236,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ gt(X1,X0)
      | leq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f123]) ).

fof(f123,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ gt(X1,X0)
      | leq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X1,X0] :
      ( gt(X1,X0)
     => leq(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',leq_gt1) ).

fof(f1059,plain,
    gt(pv1325,n0),
    inference(resolution,[],[f1058,f963]) ).

fof(f963,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ~ leq(n1,X2)
      | gt(X2,n0) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f412,f407]) ).

fof(f407,plain,
    n1 = plus(n1,n0),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f327,f266]) ).

fof(f266,plain,
    ! [X0] : succ(X0) = plus(n1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

fof(f30,axiom,
    ! [X0] : succ(X0) = plus(n1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',succ_plus_1_l) ).

fof(f327,plain,
    n1 = succ(n0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f84]) ).

fof(f84,axiom,
    n1 = succ(n0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',successor_1) ).

fof(f412,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ leq(plus(n1,X1),X0)
      | gt(X0,X1) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f335,f266]) ).

fof(f335,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( gt(X0,X1)
      | ~ leq(succ(X1),X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f139]) ).

fof(f139,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( gt(X0,X1)
      | ~ leq(succ(X1),X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f98]) ).

fof(f98,plain,
    ! [X1,X0] :
      ( leq(succ(X1),X0)
     => gt(X0,X1) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f43]) ).

fof(f43,axiom,
    ! [X1,X0] :
      ( leq(succ(X0),X1)
     => gt(X1,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',leq_succ_gt) ).

fof(f1058,plain,
    leq(n1,pv1325),
    inference(resolution,[],[f1050,f236]) ).

fof(f1050,plain,
    gt(pv1325,n1),
    inference(resolution,[],[f970,f350]) ).

fof(f350,plain,
    leq(n2,pv1325),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f125]) ).

fof(f970,plain,
    ! [X5] :
      ( ~ leq(n2,X5)
      | gt(X5,n1) ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f966,f407]) ).

fof(f966,plain,
    ! [X5] :
      ( gt(X5,plus(n1,n0))
      | ~ leq(n2,X5) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f412,f395]) ).

fof(f395,plain,
    n2 = plus(n1,plus(n1,n0)),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f263,f266,f266]) ).

fof(f263,plain,
    n2 = succ(succ(n0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f85]) ).

fof(f85,axiom,
    n2 = succ(succ(n0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',successor_2) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : SWV134+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 18:59:20 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.51  % (3361)ott+10_1:28_bd=off:bs=on:tgt=ground:i=101:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/101Mi)
% 0.21/0.52  % (3370)ott+3_1:1_gsp=on:lcm=predicate:i=138:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/138Mi)
% 0.21/0.57  % (3361)First to succeed.
% 0.21/0.57  % (3361)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.57  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.57  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.57  % (3361)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.57  % (3361)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.21/0.57  % (3361)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.21/0.57  % (3361)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.57  
% 0.21/0.57  % (3361)Memory used [KB]: 6140
% 0.21/0.57  % (3361)Time elapsed: 0.120 s
% 0.21/0.57  % (3361)Instructions burned: 41 (million)
% 0.21/0.57  % (3361)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.57  % (3361)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.57  % (3348)Success in time 0.208 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------