%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWV133+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:41:23 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.25s 1.48s
% Output   : Refutation 1.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : SWV133+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 04:30:50 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.25/1.48  
% 1.25/1.48  SPASS V 3.9 
% 1.25/1.48  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 1.25/1.48  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.25/1.48  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 1.25/1.48  SPASS derived 4742 clauses, backtracked 960 clauses, performed 8 splits and kept 2876 clauses.
% 1.25/1.48  SPASS allocated 89152 KBytes.
% 1.25/1.48  SPASS spent	0:00:01.10 on the problem.
% 1.25/1.48  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 1.25/1.48  		0:00:00.08 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 1.25/1.48  		0:00:00.03 for inferences.
% 1.25/1.48  		0:00:00.03 for the backtracking.
% 1.25/1.48  		0:00:00.84 for the reduction.
% 1.25/1.48  
% 1.25/1.48  
% 1.25/1.48  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 8 :
% 1.25/1.48  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.25/1.48  5[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(n2,pv1325)*l.
% 1.25/1.48  20[0:Inp] ||  -> gt(n2,n0)*l.
% 1.25/1.48  32[0:Inp] || leq(n0,pv1325)*l -> .
% 1.25/1.48  70[0:Inp] || gt(u,v)* -> leq(v,u).
% 1.25/1.48  106[0:Inp] || leq(u,v)* leq(v,w)* -> leq(u,w)*.
% 1.25/1.48  6394[0:Res:20.0,70.0] ||  -> leq(n0,n2)*r.
% 1.25/1.48  6989[0:OCh:106.1,106.0,6394.0,5.0] ||  -> leq(n0,pv1325)*l.
% 1.25/1.48  6994[0:MRR:6989.0,32.0] ||  -> .
% 1.25/1.48  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.25/1.48  Formulae used in the proof : gauss_array_0003 gt_2_0 leq_gt1 transitivity_leq
% 1.25/1.48  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------