TSTP Solution File: SWV105+1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SWV105+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May 5 10:28:04 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.60s 0.77s
% Output : Refutation 0.60s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 8 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 20 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 16 ( 4 ~; 0 |; 8 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f229,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f127,f140]) ).
fof(f140,plain,
true,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f51]) ).
fof(f51,axiom,
true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hJIPj8TWOF/Vampire---4.8_11383',ttrue) ).
fof(f127,plain,
~ true,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f98]) ).
fof(f98,plain,
( ~ true
& lt(n0,a_select2(sigma,pv43))
& leq(pv43,minus(n6,n1))
& leq(n0,pv43) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f97]) ).
fof(f97,plain,
( ~ true
& lt(n0,a_select2(sigma,pv43))
& leq(pv43,minus(n6,n1))
& leq(n0,pv43) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f54]) ).
fof(f54,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( leq(pv43,minus(n6,n1))
& leq(n0,pv43) )
=> ( lt(n0,a_select2(sigma,pv43))
=> true ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f53]) ).
fof(f53,conjecture,
( ( leq(pv43,minus(n6,n1))
& leq(n0,pv43) )
=> ( lt(n0,a_select2(sigma,pv43))
=> true ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hJIPj8TWOF/Vampire---4.8_11383',quaternion_ds1_inuse_0017) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.14 % Problem : SWV105+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.15/0.16 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.16/0.37 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.37 % DateTime : Fri May 3 21:13:08 EDT 2024
% 0.16/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.38 This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.16/0.38 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hJIPj8TWOF/Vampire---4.8_11383
% 0.60/0.77 % (11639)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.60/0.77 % (11633)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.60/0.77 % (11636)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.60/0.77 % (11634)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.60/0.77 % (11635)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.60/0.77 % (11637)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.60/0.77 % (11638)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.60/0.77 % (11639)First to succeed.
% 0.60/0.77 % (11639)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-11629"
% 0.60/0.77 % (11636)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.60/0.77 % (11639)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.60/0.77 % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.60/0.77 % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.60/0.77 % (11639)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.77 % (11639)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.60/0.77 % (11639)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.60/0.77
% 0.60/0.77 % (11639)Memory used [KB]: 1134
% 0.60/0.77 % (11639)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.60/0.77 % (11639)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.60/0.77 % (11629)Success in time 0.385 s
% 0.60/0.77 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------