TSTP Solution File: SWV080+1 by SnakeForV---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem : SWV080+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:44:05 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 0.47s
% Output : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 29 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 25 ( 9 ~; 4 |; 8 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 3 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f200,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f197,f198,f199]) ).
fof(f199,plain,
spl0_2,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f132,f194]) ).
fof(f194,plain,
( spl0_2
<=> leq(n0,pv56) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])]) ).
fof(f132,plain,
leq(n0,pv56),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f114]) ).
fof(f114,plain,
( leq(n0,pv56)
& leq(pv56,minus(n5,n1))
& ( ~ leq(n0,pv56)
| ~ leq(pv56,minus(n5,n1)) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f113]) ).
fof(f113,plain,
( ( ~ leq(n0,pv56)
| ~ leq(pv56,minus(n5,n1)) )
& leq(n0,pv56)
& leq(pv56,minus(n5,n1)) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f54]) ).
fof(f54,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( leq(n0,pv56)
& leq(pv56,minus(n5,n1)) )
=> ( leq(n0,pv56)
& leq(pv56,minus(n5,n1)) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f53]) ).
fof(f53,conjecture,
( ( leq(n0,pv56)
& leq(pv56,minus(n5,n1)) )
=> ( leq(n0,pv56)
& leq(pv56,minus(n5,n1)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cl5_nebula_array_0021) ).
fof(f198,plain,
spl0_1,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f131,f190]) ).
fof(f190,plain,
( spl0_1
<=> leq(pv56,minus(n5,n1)) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])]) ).
fof(f131,plain,
leq(pv56,minus(n5,n1)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f114]) ).
fof(f197,plain,
( ~ spl0_1
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f130,f194,f190]) ).
fof(f130,plain,
( ~ leq(n0,pv56)
| ~ leq(pv56,minus(n5,n1)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f114]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : SWV080+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 19:02:35 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.46 % (18188)lrs+2_1:1_lcm=reverse:lma=on:sos=all:spb=goal_then_units:ss=included:urr=on:i=39:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/39Mi)
% 0.21/0.46 % (18188)First to succeed.
% 0.21/0.47 % (18188)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.47 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.47 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.47 % (18188)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.47 % (18188)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.21/0.47 % (18188)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.21/0.47 % (18188)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.47
% 0.21/0.47 % (18188)Memory used [KB]: 6012
% 0.21/0.47 % (18188)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.47 % (18188)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.21/0.47 % (18188)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.47 % (18188)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.47 % (18180)Success in time 0.107 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------