TSTP Solution File: SWV077+1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : SWV077+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:55:25 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.14s 0.45s
% Output : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 24 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 75 ( 14 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 84 ( 33 ~; 23 |; 18 &)
% ( 4 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 6 usr; 6 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f433,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f416,f417,f425,f429,f432]) ).
fof(f432,plain,
spl31_1,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f397,f402]) ).
fof(f402,plain,
( spl31_1
<=> leq(pv31,sF30) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl31_1])]) ).
fof(f397,plain,
leq(pv31,sF30),
inference(definition_folding,[],[f184,f396]) ).
fof(f396,plain,
minus(n5,n1) = sF30,
introduced(function_definition,[]) ).
fof(f184,plain,
leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f150]) ).
fof(f150,plain,
( leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(n0,pv31)
& ( ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
| ( ~ true
& n0 = pv40 )
| ~ leq(n0,pv31)
| ( ( ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,pv31) )
& n0 != pv40 ) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f149]) ).
fof(f149,plain,
( ( ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
| ( ~ true
& n0 = pv40 )
| ~ leq(n0,pv31)
| ( ( ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,pv31) )
& n0 != pv40 ) )
& leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(n0,pv31) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f54]) ).
fof(f54,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(n0,pv31) )
=> ( leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(n0,pv31)
& ( n0 = pv40
=> true )
& ( n0 != pv40
=> ( leq(n0,pv31)
& leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1)) ) ) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f53]) ).
fof(f53,conjecture,
( ( leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(n0,pv31) )
=> ( leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(n0,pv31)
& ( n0 = pv40
=> true )
& ( n0 != pv40
=> ( leq(n0,pv31)
& leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1)) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cl5_nebula_array_0018) ).
fof(f429,plain,
( ~ spl31_1
| ~ spl31_2
| spl31_4 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f399,f422,f406,f402]) ).
fof(f406,plain,
( spl31_2
<=> leq(n0,pv31) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl31_2])]) ).
fof(f422,plain,
( spl31_4
<=> n0 = pv40 ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl31_4])]) ).
fof(f399,plain,
( n0 = pv40
| ~ leq(n0,pv31)
| ~ leq(pv31,sF30) ),
inference(definition_folding,[],[f181,f396]) ).
fof(f181,plain,
( ~ leq(n0,pv31)
| n0 = pv40
| ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f150]) ).
fof(f425,plain,
( ~ spl31_2
| ~ spl31_1
| ~ spl31_4
| ~ spl31_3 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f398,f410,f422,f402,f406]) ).
fof(f410,plain,
( spl31_3
<=> true ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl31_3])]) ).
fof(f398,plain,
( ~ true
| n0 != pv40
| ~ leq(pv31,sF30)
| ~ leq(n0,pv31) ),
inference(definition_folding,[],[f182,f396]) ).
fof(f182,plain,
( n0 != pv40
| ~ leq(n0,pv31)
| ~ true
| ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f150]) ).
fof(f417,plain,
spl31_2,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f183,f406]) ).
fof(f183,plain,
leq(n0,pv31),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f150]) ).
fof(f416,plain,
spl31_3,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f207,f410]) ).
fof(f207,plain,
true,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f51]) ).
fof(f51,axiom,
true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ttrue) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.08 % Problem : SWV077+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.09 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.09/0.28 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.28 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.28 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.28 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.28 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.28 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.28 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.28 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 19:13:51 EDT 2022
% 0.09/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.41 % (30694)ott+10_1:5_bd=off:tgt=full:i=500:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/500Mi)
% 0.14/0.41 % (30672)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.14/0.42 % (30671)ott+4_1:1_av=off:bd=off:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:s2at=2.0:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsql=off:slsqr=1,2:sp=frequency:i=37:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/37Mi)
% 0.14/0.42 % (30670)ott+10_1:32_abs=on:br=off:urr=ec_only:i=50:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/50Mi)
% 0.14/0.43 % (30675)fmb+10_1:1_fmbsr=2.0:nm=4:skr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.14/0.43 % (30688)ott+4_1:1_av=off:bd=off:nwc=5.0:rp=on:s2a=on:s2at=2.0:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsql=off:slsqr=1,2:sp=frequency:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 0.14/0.43 % (30672)First to succeed.
% 0.14/0.43 % (30698)ott+10_7:2_awrs=decay:awrsf=8:bd=preordered:drc=off:fd=preordered:fde=unused:fsr=off:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsqr=5,8:sp=const_min:spb=units:to=lpo:i=355:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/355Mi)
% 0.14/0.43 % (30677)dis+2_1:64_add=large:bce=on:bd=off:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.14/0.43 % (30677)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.43 % (30677)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.43 % (30677)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.14/0.43 % (30677)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.14/0.43 % (30677)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.43 % (30677)Termination phase: Preprocessing 1
% 0.14/0.43
% 0.14/0.43 % (30677)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.14/0.43 % (30677)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.43 % (30677)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.43 % (30677)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.43 % (30677)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.44 % (30696)ott+11_2:3_av=off:fde=unused:nwc=5.0:tgt=ground:i=177:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/177Mi)
% 0.14/0.44 % (30682)ott+10_1:5_bd=off:tgt=full:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99Mi)
% 0.14/0.44 % (30685)dis+34_1:32_abs=on:add=off:bsr=on:gsp=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99Mi)
% 0.14/0.44 % (30686)fmb+10_1:1_bce=on:i=59:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/59Mi)
% 0.14/0.44 % (30687)ott+10_1:1_tgt=ground:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 0.14/0.45 % (30672)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.14/0.45 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.45 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.45 % (30672)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.45 % (30672)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.14/0.45 % (30672)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.14/0.45 % (30672)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.14/0.45
% 0.14/0.45 % (30672)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 0.14/0.45 % (30672)Time elapsed: 0.010 s
% 0.14/0.45 % (30672)Instructions burned: 19 (million)
% 0.14/0.45 % (30672)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.45 % (30672)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.45 % (30668)Success in time 0.154 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------