TSTP Solution File: SWV077+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWV077+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 18:15:06 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.25s 1.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 51 ( 8 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 20 ( 5 avg)
% Number of connectives : 68 ( 27 ~; 20 |; 15 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(cl5_nebula_array_0018,conjecture,
( ( leq(n0,pv31)
& leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1)) )
=> ( leq(n0,pv31)
& leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
& ( n0 != pv40
=> ( leq(n0,pv31)
& leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1)) ) )
& ( n0 = pv40
=> true ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',cl5_nebula_array_0018) ).
fof(ttrue,axiom,
true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',ttrue) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( leq(n0,pv31)
& leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1)) )
=> ( leq(n0,pv31)
& leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
& ( n0 != pv40
=> ( leq(n0,pv31)
& leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1)) ) )
& ( n0 = pv40
=> true ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cl5_nebula_array_0018]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( leq(n0,pv31)
& leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
& ( n0 = pv40
| n0 != pv40
| ~ leq(n0,pv31)
| ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1)) )
& ( ~ true
| n0 != pv40
| ~ leq(n0,pv31)
| ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1)) )
& ( n0 = pv40
| ~ leq(n0,pv31)
| ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,pv31)
| ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1)) )
& ( ~ true
| ~ leq(n0,pv31)
| ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,pv31)
| ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1)) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,pv31)
| ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,pv31)
| ~ true ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ true
| ~ leq(n0,pv31)
| ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
true,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ttrue]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
leq(n0,pv31),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]),c_0_8])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : SWV077+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 15:40:11 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.25/1.43 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.25/1.43 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.25/1.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.018 s
% 0.25/1.43
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof found!
% 0.25/1.43 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.25/1.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object total steps : 10
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object clause steps : 6
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object formula steps : 4
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object conjectures : 8
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object clause conjectures : 5
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object initial formulas used : 2
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object generating inferences : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 5
% 0.25/1.43 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.25/1.43 # Parsed axioms : 85
% 0.25/1.43 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 23
% 0.25/1.43 # Initial clauses : 70
% 0.25/1.43 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 3
% 0.25/1.43 # Initial clauses in saturation : 67
% 0.25/1.43 # Processed clauses : 5
% 0.25/1.43 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # ...remaining for further processing : 4
% 0.25/1.43 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Current number of processed clauses : 4
% 0.25/1.43 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.25/1.43 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 62
% 0.25/1.43 # ...number of literals in the above : 112
% 0.25/1.43 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.25/1.43 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3426
% 0.25/1.43
% 0.25/1.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/1.43 # User time : 0.015 s
% 0.25/1.43 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.25/1.43 # Total time : 0.018 s
% 0.25/1.43 # Maximum resident set size: 2908 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------