%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWV070+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:41:10 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.49s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : SWV070+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.12/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 16:19:39 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.19/0.49  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.49  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.49  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.19/0.49  SPASS derived 1 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 106 clauses.
% 0.19/0.49  SPASS allocated 85753 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.49  SPASS spent	0:00:00.15 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.49  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.19/0.49  		0:00:00.08 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.49  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.49  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.49  		0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  Here is a proof with depth 0, length 7 :
% 0.19/0.49  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.49  2[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(n0,pv10)*r.
% 0.19/0.49  37[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))*r.
% 0.19/0.49  62[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(minus(u,n1),pred(u))**.
% 0.19/0.49  98[0:Inp] || leq(n0,pv10) leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))*r -> .
% 0.19/0.49  157[0:Rew:62.0,37.0] ||  -> leq(pv10,pred(n135300))*r.
% 0.19/0.49  158[0:Rew:62.0,98.1] || leq(n0,pv10) leq(pv10,pred(n135300))*r -> .
% 0.19/0.49  159[0:MRR:158.0,158.1,2.0,157.0] ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.49  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.49  Formulae used in the proof : cl5_nebula_array_0011 pred_minus_1
% 0.19/0.49  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------