TSTP Solution File: SWV069+1 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : SWV069+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : art03.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Dec 26 12:01:56 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 0.19s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 27 ( 15 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 63 ( 3 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 59 ( 23 ~; 21 |; 12 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 0 sgn 10 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(20,axiom,
! [X1] : leq(X1,X1),
file('/tmp/tmp6FC57s/sel_SWV069+1.p_1',reflexivity_leq) ).
fof(21,axiom,
! [X1] : minus(X1,n1) = pred(X1),
file('/tmp/tmp6FC57s/sel_SWV069+1.p_1',pred_minus_1) ).
fof(24,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( leq(X1,pred(X2))
<=> gt(X2,X1) ),
file('/tmp/tmp6FC57s/sel_SWV069+1.p_1',leq_gt_pred) ).
fof(31,axiom,
gt(n5,n0),
file('/tmp/tmp6FC57s/sel_SWV069+1.p_1',gt_5_0) ).
fof(56,conjecture,
( ( leq(n0,pv10)
& leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1)) )
=> ( leq(n0,n0)
& leq(n0,pv10)
& leq(n0,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1)) ) ),
file('/tmp/tmp6FC57s/sel_SWV069+1.p_1',cl5_nebula_array_0010) ).
fof(69,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( leq(n0,pv10)
& leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1)) )
=> ( leq(n0,n0)
& leq(n0,pv10)
& leq(n0,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1)) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[56]) ).
fof(115,plain,
! [X2] : leq(X2,X2),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[20]) ).
cnf(116,plain,
leq(X1,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[115]) ).
fof(117,plain,
! [X2] : minus(X2,n1) = pred(X2),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[21]) ).
cnf(118,plain,
minus(X1,n1) = pred(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[117]) ).
fof(125,plain,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( ~ leq(X1,pred(X2))
| gt(X2,X1) )
& ( ~ gt(X2,X1)
| leq(X1,pred(X2)) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[24]) ).
fof(126,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( ~ leq(X3,pred(X4))
| gt(X4,X3) )
& ( ~ gt(X4,X3)
| leq(X3,pred(X4)) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[125]) ).
cnf(127,plain,
( leq(X1,pred(X2))
| ~ gt(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[126]) ).
cnf(141,plain,
gt(n5,n0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[31]) ).
fof(176,negated_conjecture,
( leq(n0,pv10)
& leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
& ( ~ leq(n0,n0)
| ~ leq(n0,pv10)
| ~ leq(n0,minus(n5,n1))
| ~ leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1)) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[69]) ).
cnf(177,negated_conjecture,
( ~ leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,minus(n5,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,pv10)
| ~ leq(n0,n0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[176]) ).
cnf(178,negated_conjecture,
leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[176]) ).
cnf(179,negated_conjecture,
leq(n0,pv10),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[176]) ).
cnf(221,plain,
( leq(X1,minus(X2,n1))
| ~ gt(X2,X1) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[127,118,theory(equality)]),
[unfolding] ).
cnf(350,negated_conjecture,
( $false
| ~ leq(n0,pv10)
| ~ leq(n0,minus(n5,n1))
| ~ leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1)) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[177,116,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(351,negated_conjecture,
( $false
| $false
| ~ leq(n0,minus(n5,n1))
| ~ leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1)) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[350,179,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(352,negated_conjecture,
( $false
| $false
| ~ leq(n0,minus(n5,n1))
| $false ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[351,178,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(353,negated_conjecture,
~ leq(n0,minus(n5,n1)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[352,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(355,negated_conjecture,
~ gt(n5,n0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[353,221,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(356,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[355,141,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(357,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[356,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(358,negated_conjecture,
$false,
357,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SWV/SWV069+1.p
% --creating new selector for [SWV003+0.ax]
% -running prover on /tmp/tmp6FC57s/sel_SWV069+1.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem SWV069+1.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SWV/SWV069+1.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SWV/SWV069+1.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------