TSTP Solution File: SWV065+1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SWV065+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May 5 10:27:54 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.59s 0.75s
% Output : Refutation 0.59s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 22 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 68 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 70 ( 24 ~; 18 |; 22 &)
% ( 4 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 5 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 2 ( 2 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f230,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f225,f226,f227,f228,f229]) ).
fof(f229,plain,
spl1_1,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f121,f210]) ).
fof(f210,plain,
( spl1_1
<=> leq(n0,pv10) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_1])]) ).
fof(f121,plain,
leq(n0,pv10),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f95]) ).
fof(f95,plain,
( ( ~ leq(pv53,minus(n5,n1))
| ~ leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,pv53)
| ~ leq(n0,pv10)
| ~ leq(n0,n0) )
& leq(pv53,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
& leq(n0,pv53)
& leq(n0,pv10) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f94]) ).
fof(f94,plain,
( ( ~ leq(pv53,minus(n5,n1))
| ~ leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,pv53)
| ~ leq(n0,pv10)
| ~ leq(n0,n0) )
& leq(pv53,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
& leq(n0,pv53)
& leq(n0,pv10) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f54]) ).
fof(f54,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( leq(pv53,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
& leq(n0,pv53)
& leq(n0,pv10) )
=> ( leq(pv53,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
& leq(n0,pv53)
& leq(n0,pv10)
& leq(n0,n0) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f53]) ).
fof(f53,conjecture,
( ( leq(pv53,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
& leq(n0,pv53)
& leq(n0,pv10) )
=> ( leq(pv53,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
& leq(n0,pv53)
& leq(n0,pv10)
& leq(n0,n0) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fJjr2ESDH7/Vampire---4.8_11082',cl5_nebula_array_0006) ).
fof(f228,plain,
spl1_2,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f122,f214]) ).
fof(f214,plain,
( spl1_2
<=> leq(n0,pv53) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_2])]) ).
fof(f122,plain,
leq(n0,pv53),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f95]) ).
fof(f227,plain,
spl1_3,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f123,f218]) ).
fof(f218,plain,
( spl1_3
<=> leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1)) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_3])]) ).
fof(f123,plain,
leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f95]) ).
fof(f226,plain,
spl1_4,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f124,f222]) ).
fof(f222,plain,
( spl1_4
<=> leq(pv53,minus(n5,n1)) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_4])]) ).
fof(f124,plain,
leq(pv53,minus(n5,n1)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f95]) ).
fof(f225,plain,
( ~ spl1_1
| ~ spl1_2
| ~ spl1_3
| ~ spl1_4 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f208,f222,f218,f214,f210]) ).
fof(f208,plain,
( ~ leq(pv53,minus(n5,n1))
| ~ leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,pv53)
| ~ leq(n0,pv10) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f125,f130]) ).
fof(f130,plain,
! [X0] : leq(X0,X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X0] : leq(X0,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fJjr2ESDH7/Vampire---4.8_11082',reflexivity_leq) ).
fof(f125,plain,
( ~ leq(pv53,minus(n5,n1))
| ~ leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,pv53)
| ~ leq(n0,pv10)
| ~ leq(n0,n0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f95]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SWV065+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Fri May 3 21:06:23 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.13/0.36 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fJjr2ESDH7/Vampire---4.8_11082
% 0.59/0.75 % (11407)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.59/0.75 % (11400)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.59/0.75 % (11402)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.59/0.75 % (11403)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.59/0.75 % (11401)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.59/0.75 % (11404)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.59/0.75 % (11405)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.59/0.75 % (11406)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.59/0.75 % (11407)First to succeed.
% 0.59/0.75 % (11407)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-11238"
% 0.59/0.75 % (11407)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.59/0.75 % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.59/0.75 % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.59/0.75 % (11407)------------------------------
% 0.59/0.75 % (11407)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.59/0.75 % (11407)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.59/0.75
% 0.59/0.75 % (11407)Memory used [KB]: 1099
% 0.59/0.75 % (11407)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.59/0.75 % (11407)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.59/0.75 % (11238)Success in time 0.386 s
% 0.59/0.75 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------