%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SInE---0.4
% Problem  : SWV058+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s

% Computer : art03.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Dec 26 11:59:49 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   10 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   14 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   12 (   8   ~;   0   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn   0   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(22,axiom,
    true,
    file('/tmp/tmpB1YnNe/sel_SWV058+1.p_1',ttrue) ).

fof(42,conjecture,
    ( ~ geq(pv72,tptp_float_0_001)
   => true ),
    file('/tmp/tmpB1YnNe/sel_SWV058+1.p_1',cl5_nebula_norm_0046) ).

fof(59,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ~ geq(pv72,tptp_float_0_001)
     => true ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[42]) ).

fof(61,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ~ geq(pv72,tptp_float_0_001)
     => true ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[59,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(113,plain,
    true,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[22]) ).

fof(140,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ geq(pv72,tptp_float_0_001)
    & ~ true ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[61]) ).

cnf(141,negated_conjecture,
    ~ true,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[140]) ).

cnf(191,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[141,113,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(192,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[191,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(193,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    192,
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SWV/SWV058+1.p
% --creating new selector for [SWV003+0.ax]
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpB1YnNe/sel_SWV058+1.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem SWV058+1.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SWV/SWV058+1.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SWV/SWV058+1.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------