TSTP Solution File: SWV056+1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : SWV056+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : NO INFORMATION
% Format   : NO INFORMATION
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Q5ItdYgoeE true

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep  1 00:07:27 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.56s 0.78s
% Output   : Refutation 0.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   18
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (  15 unt;  13 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   28 (  15 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  111 (   7   ~;   2   |;   6   &;  94   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   12 (  12   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   15 (  13 usr;   8 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (   0   ^;   6   !;   0   ?;   6   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(pred_type,type,
    pred: $i > $i ).

thf(q_type,type,
    q: $i ).

thf(tptp_minus_1_type,type,
    tptp_minus_1: $i ).

thf(a_select3_type,type,
    a_select3: $i > $i > $i > $i ).

thf(minus_type,type,
    minus: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(sum_type,type,
    sum: $i > $i > $i > $i ).

thf(n1_type,type,
    n1: $i ).

thf(leq_type,type,
    leq: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(pv77_type,type,
    pv77: $i ).

thf(n5_type,type,
    n5: $i ).

thf(n0_type,type,
    n0: $i ).

thf(pv25_type,type,
    pv25: $i ).

thf(succ_type,type,
    succ: $i > $i ).

thf(cl5_nebula_norm_0040,conjecture,
    ( ( ( leq @ n0 @ pv25 )
      & ( leq @ pv25 @ ( minus @ n5 @ n1 ) ) )
   => ( ( n0
        = ( sum @ n0 @ ( minus @ n0 @ n1 ) @ ( a_select3 @ q @ pv77 @ pv25 ) ) )
      & ( leq @ n0 @ pv25 )
      & ( leq @ pv25 @ ( minus @ n5 @ n1 ) ) ) ) ).

thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ( leq @ n0 @ pv25 )
        & ( leq @ pv25 @ ( minus @ n5 @ n1 ) ) )
     => ( ( n0
          = ( sum @ n0 @ ( minus @ n0 @ n1 ) @ ( a_select3 @ q @ pv77 @ pv25 ) ) )
        & ( leq @ n0 @ pv25 )
        & ( leq @ pv25 @ ( minus @ n5 @ n1 ) ) ) ),
    inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[cl5_nebula_norm_0040]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl107,plain,
    ( ( n0
     != ( sum @ n0 @ ( minus @ n0 @ n1 ) @ ( a_select3 @ q @ pv77 @ pv25 ) ) )
    | ~ ( leq @ n0 @ pv25 )
    | ~ ( leq @ pv25 @ ( minus @ n5 @ n1 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl105,plain,
    leq @ n0 @ pv25,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl106,plain,
    leq @ pv25 @ ( minus @ n5 @ n1 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl605,plain,
    ( n0
   != ( sum @ n0 @ ( minus @ n0 @ n1 ) @ ( a_select3 @ q @ pv77 @ pv25 ) ) ),
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl107,zip_derived_cl105,zip_derived_cl106]) ).

thf(pred_minus_1,axiom,
    ! [X: $i] :
      ( ( minus @ X @ n1 )
      = ( pred @ X ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl59,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( minus @ X0 @ n1 )
      = ( pred @ X0 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[pred_minus_1]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl613,plain,
    ( n0
   != ( sum @ n0 @ ( pred @ n0 ) @ ( a_select3 @ q @ pv77 @ pv25 ) ) ),
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl605,zip_derived_cl59]) ).

thf(succ_tptp_minus_1,axiom,
    ( ( succ @ tptp_minus_1 )
    = n0 ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl48,plain,
    ( ( succ @ tptp_minus_1 )
    = n0 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[succ_tptp_minus_1]) ).

thf(pred_succ,axiom,
    ! [X: $i] :
      ( ( pred @ ( succ @ X ) )
      = X ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl60,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( pred @ ( succ @ X0 ) )
      = X0 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[pred_succ]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl697,plain,
    ( ( pred @ n0 )
    = tptp_minus_1 ),
    inference('sup+',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl48,zip_derived_cl60]) ).

thf(sum_plus_base,axiom,
    ! [Body: $i] :
      ( ( sum @ n0 @ tptp_minus_1 @ Body )
      = n0 ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl46,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( sum @ n0 @ tptp_minus_1 @ X0 )
      = n0 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[sum_plus_base]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl700,plain,
    n0 != n0,
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl613,zip_derived_cl697,zip_derived_cl46]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl701,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simplify,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl700]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : SWV056+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Q5ItdYgoeE true
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 03:44:28 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.35  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.35  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.35  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.35  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.36  % Running in FO mode
% 0.48/0.63  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.48/0.63  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.48/0.63  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.56/0.70  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.71  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.56/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.56/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.56/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.56/0.78  % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 0.56/0.78  % BCE start: 108
% 0.56/0.78  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.56/0.78  % PE start: 108
% 0.56/0.78  logic: eq
% 0.56/0.78  % PE eliminated: 3
% 0.56/0.78  % done 57 iterations in 0.050s
% 0.56/0.78  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.56/0.78  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.56/0.78  
% 0.56/0.78  
% 0.56/0.78  % Terminating...
% 1.59/0.84  % Runner terminated.
% 1.59/0.85  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------