TSTP Solution File: SWV046+1 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : SWV046+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:31:37 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.39s 0.55s
% Output : Refutation 0.39s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 15 unt; 0 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 22 ( 14 equ; 8 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 23 ( 23 usr; 14 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(222,axiom,
sum(n0,tptp_minus_1,X) = n0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',sum_plus_base) ).
cnf(225,axiom,
succ(tptp_minus_1) = n0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',succ_tptp_minus_1) ).
cnf(236,axiom,
minus(X,n1) = pred(X),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',pred_minus_1) ).
cnf(237,axiom,
pred(succ(X)) = X,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',pred_succ) ).
cnf(250,axiom,
a_select2(tptp_update2(X,Y,Z),Y) = Z,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',sel2_update_1) ).
cnf(255,axiom,
true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',ttrue) ).
cnf(257,negated_conjecture,
pv78 = sum(n0,minus(n135300,n1),a_select3(q,pv79,pv35)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cl5_nebula_norm_0010) ).
cnf(258,plain,
pv78 = sum(n0,pred(n135300),a_select3(q,pv79,pv35)),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[257,236,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(261,negated_conjecture,
leq(n0,pv35),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cl5_nebula_norm_0010) ).
cnf(262,negated_conjecture,
leq(pv35,minus(n5,n1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cl5_nebula_norm_0010) ).
cnf(263,plain,
leq(pv35,pred(n5)),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[262,236,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(264,negated_conjecture,
( n0 != pv44
| ~ true ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cl5_nebula_norm_0010) ).
cnf(265,plain,
n0 != pv44,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[264,255]) ).
cnf(266,negated_conjecture,
( n0 != sum(n0,minus(n0,n1),times(minus(a_select2(x,pv83),a_select2(tptp_update2(mu,pv35,divide(pv80,pv44)),pv35)),times(minus(a_select2(x,pv83),a_select2(tptp_update2(mu,pv35,divide(pv80,pv44)),pv35)),a_select3(q,pv83,pv35))))
| pv78 != sum(n0,minus(n135300,n1),a_select3(q,pv79,pv35))
| ~ leq(n0,pv35)
| ~ leq(pv35,minus(n5,n1))
| n0 = pv44 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cl5_nebula_norm_0010) ).
cnf(267,plain,
n0 != sum(n0,pred(n0),times(minus(a_select2(x,pv83),divide(pv80,pv44)),times(minus(a_select2(x,pv83),divide(pv80,pv44)),a_select3(q,pv83,pv35)))),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[266,265,263,261,258,250,236,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(379,plain,
pred(n0) = tptp_minus_1,
inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[237,225,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(380,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[267,222,379,theory(equality)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.10 % Problem : SWV046+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.10 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.09/0.29 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.29 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.29 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.09/0.29 % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 16:03:28 EDT 2022
% 0.09/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.37 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.37 *
% 0.14/0.37 *
% 0.14/0.38 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.14/0.38 *
% 0.14/0.38 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.14/0.38 *
% 0.14/0.38 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.14/0.38 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.14/0.38 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.14/0.38 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.14/0.38 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.14/0.38 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.14/0.38 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.14/0.38 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.14/0.38 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.14/0.38 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.14/0.38 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.14/0.38 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.14/0.38 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.14/0.38 *
% 0.14/0.38 "."
% 0.14/0.38 *
% 0.14/0.38 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-14T16:03:28
% 0.14/0.38 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n032.cluster.edu at 2022-06-14T16:03:28
% 0.39/0.55
% 0.39/0.55
% 0.39/0.55 #||
% 0.39/0.55 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/0.55 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.39/0.55 ||#
% 0.39/0.55
% 0.39/0.55 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.39/0.55 ; 462 formulas have been input or derived (from 54 formulas).
% 0.39/0.55 ; 380 (82%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.39/0.55 ; 13 ( 3%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.39/0.55 ; 367 (97%) are still being kept.
% 0.39/0.55 ;
% 0.39/0.55 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.39/0.55 ; 0.014 8% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.39/0.55 ; 0.006 3% Assert (92 calls)
% 0.39/0.55 ; 0.035 20% Process new row (449 calls)
% 0.39/0.55 ; 0.005 3% Resolution (106 calls)
% 0.39/0.55 ; 0.001 1% Paramodulation (53 calls)
% 0.39/0.55 ; 0.018 10% Condensing (238 calls)
% 0.39/0.55 ; 0.028 16% Forward subsumption (238 calls)
% 0.39/0.55 ; 0.014 8% Backward subsumption (238 calls)
% 0.39/0.55 ; 0.016 9% Clause clause subsumption (783 calls)
% 0.39/0.55 ; 0.018 10% Forward simplification (449 calls)
% 0.39/0.55 ; 0.000 0% Backward simplification (371 calls)
% 0.39/0.55 ; 0.002 1% Ordering (570 calls)
% 0.39/0.55 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.39/0.55 ; 0.001 1% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.39/0.55 ; 0.017 10% Other
% 0.39/0.55 ; 0.175 Total
% 0.39/0.55 ; 0.176 Real time
% 0.39/0.55 ;
% 0.39/0.55 ; Term-hash-array has 531 terms in all.
% 0.39/0.55 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 238 entries (238 at peak, 238 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.39/0.55 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,679 nodes (1,679 at peak, 1,679 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.39/0.55 ; Retrieved 682 possibly forward subsuming rows in 238 calls.
% 0.39/0.55 ; Retrieved 505 possibly backward subsumed rows in 238 calls.
% 0.39/0.55 ; Path-index has 539 entries (547 at peak, 554 added, 15 deleted).
% 0.39/0.55 ; Path-index has 1,745 nodes (1,791 at peak, 1,800 added, 55 deleted).
% 0.39/0.55 ; Trie-index has 539 entries (547 at peak, 554 added, 15 deleted).
% 0.39/0.55 ; Trie-index has 1,358 nodes (1,438 at peak, 1,453 added, 95 deleted).
% 0.39/0.55 ; Retrieved 1,491 generalization terms in 1,635 calls.
% 0.39/0.55 ; Retrieved 145 instance terms in 132 calls.
% 0.39/0.55 ; Retrieved 1,974 unifiable terms in 278 calls.
% 0.39/0.55 ;
% 0.39/0.55 ; The agenda of rows to process has 1 entry:
% 0.39/0.55 ; 1 with value 7
% 0.39/0.55 ; The agenda of input rows to give has 247 entries:
% 0.39/0.55 ; 1 with value 4 1 with value 22 8 with value 47
% 0.39/0.55 ; 1 with value 8 1 with value 24 2 with value 50
% 0.39/0.55 ; 8 with value 10 2 with value 27 4 with value 51
% 0.39/0.55 ; 6 with value 11 1 with value 28 16 with value 59
% 0.39/0.55 ; 7 with value 12 1 with value 29 2 with value 60
% 0.39/0.55 ; 2 with value 13 1 with value 30 1 with value 64
% 0.39/0.55 ; 2 with value 14 1 with value 32 2 with value 72
% 0.39/0.55 ; 3 with value 16 1 with value 33 64 with value 93
% 0.39/0.55 ; 1 with value 18 8 with value 37 48 with value 106
% 0.39/0.56 ; 1 with value 20 4 with value 38 12 with value 119
% 0.39/0.56 ; 1 with value 21 33 with value 46 1 with value 132
% 0.39/0.56 ; The agenda of rows to give has 67 entries:
% 0.39/0.56 ; 60 with value (4 5) 7 with value (4 7)
% 0.39/0.56 Evaluation took:
% 0.39/0.56 0.176 seconds of real time
% 0.39/0.56 0.15961 seconds of user run time
% 0.39/0.56 0.016861 seconds of system run time
% 0.39/0.56 [Run times include 0.005 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.39/0.56 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.39/0.56 0 page faults and
% 0.39/0.56 17,528,776 bytes consed.
% 0.39/0.56 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.39/0.56 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-14T16:03:28
% 0.39/0.56 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.39/0.56 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------