TSTP Solution File: SWV046+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SWV046+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 18:14:59 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 1.40s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (  27 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   74 (  48 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   18 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   65 (  23   ~;  15   |;  21   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   25 (  25 usr;  15 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   2 sgn  14   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(cl5_nebula_norm_0010,conjecture,
    ( ( pv78 = sum(n0,minus(n135300,n1),a_select3(q,pv79,pv35))
      & pv80 = sum(n0,minus(n135300,n1),times(a_select3(q,pv81,pv35),a_select2(x,pv81)))
      & leq(n0,pv35)
      & leq(pv35,minus(n5,n1)) )
   => ( ( n0 != pv44
       => ( n0 = sum(n0,minus(n0,n1),times(minus(a_select2(x,pv83),a_select2(tptp_update2(mu,pv35,divide(pv80,pv44)),pv35)),times(minus(a_select2(x,pv83),a_select2(tptp_update2(mu,pv35,divide(pv80,pv44)),pv35)),a_select3(q,pv83,pv35))))
          & pv78 = sum(n0,minus(n135300,n1),a_select3(q,pv79,pv35))
          & leq(n0,pv35)
          & leq(pv35,minus(n5,n1)) ) )
      & ( n0 = pv44
       => true ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',cl5_nebula_norm_0010) ).

fof(pred_succ,axiom,
    ! [X1] : pred(succ(X1)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',pred_succ) ).

fof(succ_plus_1_r,axiom,
    ! [X1] : plus(X1,n1) = succ(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',succ_plus_1_r) ).

fof(pred_minus_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] : minus(X1,n1) = pred(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',pred_minus_1) ).

fof(ttrue,axiom,
    true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',ttrue) ).

fof(sel2_update_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X7,X17] : a_select2(tptp_update2(X1,X7,X17),X7) = X17,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',sel2_update_1) ).

fof(succ_tptp_minus_1,axiom,
    succ(tptp_minus_1) = n0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',succ_tptp_minus_1) ).

fof(sum_plus_base,axiom,
    ! [X23] : sum(n0,tptp_minus_1,X23) = n0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',sum_plus_base) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( pv78 = sum(n0,minus(n135300,n1),a_select3(q,pv79,pv35))
        & pv80 = sum(n0,minus(n135300,n1),times(a_select3(q,pv81,pv35),a_select2(x,pv81)))
        & leq(n0,pv35)
        & leq(pv35,minus(n5,n1)) )
     => ( ( n0 != pv44
         => ( n0 = sum(n0,minus(n0,n1),times(minus(a_select2(x,pv83),a_select2(tptp_update2(mu,pv35,divide(pv80,pv44)),pv35)),times(minus(a_select2(x,pv83),a_select2(tptp_update2(mu,pv35,divide(pv80,pv44)),pv35)),a_select3(q,pv83,pv35))))
            & pv78 = sum(n0,minus(n135300,n1),a_select3(q,pv79,pv35))
            & leq(n0,pv35)
            & leq(pv35,minus(n5,n1)) ) )
        & ( n0 = pv44
         => true ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cl5_nebula_norm_0010]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( pv78 = sum(n0,minus(n135300,n1),a_select3(q,pv79,pv35))
    & pv80 = sum(n0,minus(n135300,n1),times(a_select3(q,pv81,pv35),a_select2(x,pv81)))
    & leq(n0,pv35)
    & leq(pv35,minus(n5,n1))
    & ( n0 = pv44
      | n0 != pv44 )
    & ( ~ true
      | n0 != pv44 )
    & ( n0 = pv44
      | n0 != sum(n0,minus(n0,n1),times(minus(a_select2(x,pv83),a_select2(tptp_update2(mu,pv35,divide(pv80,pv44)),pv35)),times(minus(a_select2(x,pv83),a_select2(tptp_update2(mu,pv35,divide(pv80,pv44)),pv35)),a_select3(q,pv83,pv35))))
      | pv78 != sum(n0,minus(n135300,n1),a_select3(q,pv79,pv35))
      | ~ leq(n0,pv35)
      | ~ leq(pv35,minus(n5,n1)) )
    & ( ~ true
      | n0 != sum(n0,minus(n0,n1),times(minus(a_select2(x,pv83),a_select2(tptp_update2(mu,pv35,divide(pv80,pv44)),pv35)),times(minus(a_select2(x,pv83),a_select2(tptp_update2(mu,pv35,divide(pv80,pv44)),pv35)),a_select3(q,pv83,pv35))))
      | pv78 != sum(n0,minus(n135300,n1),a_select3(q,pv79,pv35))
      | ~ leq(n0,pv35)
      | ~ leq(pv35,minus(n5,n1)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X2] : pred(succ(X2)) = X2,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[pred_succ]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X2] : plus(X2,n1) = succ(X2),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[succ_plus_1_r]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X2] : minus(X2,n1) = pred(X2),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[pred_minus_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(pv35,minus(n5,n1))
    | ~ leq(n0,pv35)
    | pv78 != sum(n0,minus(n135300,n1),a_select3(q,pv79,pv35))
    | n0 != sum(n0,minus(n0,n1),times(minus(a_select2(x,pv83),a_select2(tptp_update2(mu,pv35,divide(pv80,pv44)),pv35)),times(minus(a_select2(x,pv83),a_select2(tptp_update2(mu,pv35,divide(pv80,pv44)),pv35)),a_select3(q,pv83,pv35))))
    | ~ true ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    true,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ttrue]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    leq(n0,pv35),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    leq(pv35,minus(n5,n1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X18,X19,X20] : a_select2(tptp_update2(X18,X19,X20),X19) = X20,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[sel2_update_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    pred(succ(X1)) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    plus(X1,n1) = succ(X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    minus(X1,n1) = pred(X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    succ(tptp_minus_1) = n0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[succ_tptp_minus_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( sum(n0,minus(n0,n1),times(minus(a_select2(x,pv83),a_select2(tptp_update2(mu,pv35,divide(pv80,pv44)),pv35)),times(minus(a_select2(x,pv83),a_select2(tptp_update2(mu,pv35,divide(pv80,pv44)),pv35)),a_select3(q,pv83,pv35)))) != n0
    | sum(n0,minus(n135300,n1),a_select3(q,pv79,pv35)) != pv78 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    pv78 = sum(n0,minus(n135300,n1),a_select3(q,pv79,pv35)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    a_select2(tptp_update2(X1,X2,X3),X2) = X3,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    minus(plus(X1,n1),n1) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    plus(tptp_minus_1,n1) = n0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_19]) ).

fof(c_0_27,plain,
    ! [X24] : sum(n0,tptp_minus_1,X24) = n0,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[sum_plus_base]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    sum(n0,minus(n0,n1),times(minus(a_select2(x,pv83),divide(pv80,pv44)),times(minus(a_select2(x,pv83),divide(pv80,pv44)),a_select3(q,pv83,pv35)))) != n0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23])]),c_0_24]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    minus(n0,n1) = tptp_minus_1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    sum(n0,tptp_minus_1,X1) = n0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_30])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : SWV046+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 16:01:38 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/1.40  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.22/1.40  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.22/1.40  # Preprocessing time       : 0.019 s
% 0.22/1.40  
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof found!
% 0.22/1.40  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/1.40  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object total steps             : 32
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object clause steps            : 17
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object formula steps           : 15
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object conjectures             : 10
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 7
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 11
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 8
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object generating inferences   : 1
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 14
% 0.22/1.40  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.22/1.40  # Parsed axioms                        : 92
% 0.22/1.40  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 19
% 0.22/1.40  # Initial clauses                      : 85
% 0.22/1.40  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 3
% 0.22/1.40  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 82
% 0.22/1.40  # Processed clauses                    : 98
% 0.22/1.40  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.22/1.40  # ...remaining for further processing  : 97
% 0.22/1.40  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
% 0.22/1.40  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Backward-rewritten                   : 6
% 0.22/1.40  # Generated clauses                    : 258
% 0.22/1.40  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 227
% 0.22/1.40  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Paramodulations                      : 254
% 0.22/1.40  # Factorizations                       : 2
% 0.22/1.40  # Equation resolutions                 : 2
% 0.22/1.40  # Current number of processed clauses  : 91
% 0.22/1.40  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 61
% 0.22/1.40  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 4
% 0.22/1.40  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.22/1.40  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 24
% 0.22/1.40  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 207
% 0.22/1.40  # ...number of literals in the above   : 399
% 0.22/1.40  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Current number of archived clauses   : 8
% 0.22/1.40  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 43
% 0.22/1.40  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12
% 0.22/1.40  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 85
% 0.22/1.40  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 21
% 0.22/1.40  # BW rewrite match successes           : 18
% 0.22/1.40  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 6868
% 0.22/1.40  
% 0.22/1.40  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/1.40  # User time                : 0.027 s
% 0.22/1.40  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.22/1.40  # Total time               : 0.029 s
% 0.22/1.40  # Maximum resident set size: 3480 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------