TSTP Solution File: SWV010-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SWV010-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 05:20:40 EDT 2024
% Result : Satisfiable 0.17s 0.46s
% Output : Saturation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_13)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( message(sent(b,t,triple(b,generate_b_nonce(X1),encrypt(triple(X2,X1,generate_expiration_time(X1)),bt))))
| ~ fresh_to_b(X1)
| ~ message(sent(X2,b,pair(X2,X1))) ),
c_0_8,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
message(sent(a,b,pair(a,an_a_nonce))),
a_sent_message_i_to_b_3,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
fresh_to_b(an_a_nonce),
nonce_a_is_fresh_to_b_9,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( message(sent(t,X1,triple(encrypt(quadruple(X2,X3,generate_key(X3),X4),X5),encrypt(triple(X1,generate_key(X3),X4),X6),X7)))
| ~ message(sent(X2,t,triple(X2,X7,encrypt(triple(X1,X3,X4),X6))))
| ~ t_holds(key(X5,X1))
| ~ t_holds(key(X6,X2)) ),
c_0_9,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
message(sent(b,t,triple(b,generate_b_nonce(an_a_nonce),encrypt(triple(a,an_a_nonce,generate_expiration_time(an_a_nonce)),bt)))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
t_holds(key(bt,b)),
t_holds_key_bt_for_b_14,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( message(sent(a,X1,pair(X2,encrypt(X3,X4))))
| ~ a_stored(pair(X1,X5))
| ~ message(sent(t,a,triple(encrypt(quadruple(X1,X5,X4,X6),at),X2,X3))) ),
c_0_13,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( message(sent(t,a,triple(encrypt(quadruple(b,an_a_nonce,generate_key(an_a_nonce),generate_expiration_time(an_a_nonce)),X1),encrypt(triple(a,generate_key(an_a_nonce),generate_expiration_time(an_a_nonce)),bt),generate_b_nonce(an_a_nonce))))
| ~ t_holds(key(X1,a)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
a_stored(pair(b,an_a_nonce)),
a_stored_message_i_4,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
t_holds(key(at,a)),
t_holds_key_at_for_a_13,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
message(sent(a,b,pair(encrypt(triple(a,generate_key(an_a_nonce),generate_expiration_time(an_a_nonce)),bt),encrypt(generate_b_nonce(an_a_nonce),generate_key(an_a_nonce))))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_20])]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : SWV010-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % DateTime : Sun May 19 06:26:22 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.45 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.46 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 11780 completed with status 1
% 0.17/0.46 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.46 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSS32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.46 # partial match(1): FHUNF-FFSF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 11785 completed with status 1
% 0.17/0.46 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.46 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSS32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.46 # partial match(1): FHUNF-FFSF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 # No proof found!
% 0.17/0.46 # SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.17/0.46 # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.46 # Parsed axioms : 8
% 0.17/0.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Initial clauses : 8
% 0.17/0.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 8
% 0.17/0.46 # Processed clauses : 19
% 0.17/0.46 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 19
% 0.17/0.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Generated clauses : 3
% 0.17/0.46 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3
% 0.17/0.46 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Paramodulations : 3
% 0.17/0.46 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # NegExts : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Total rewrite steps : 4
% 0.17/0.46 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 11
% 0.17/0.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 7
% 0.17/0.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 4
% 0.17/0.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 8
% 0.17/0.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.17/0.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 545
% 0.17/0.46 # Search garbage collected termcells : 21
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.46 # User time : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.46 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1668 pages
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.46 # User time : 0.009 s
% 0.17/0.46 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Total time : 0.017 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1704 pages
% 0.17/0.46 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.17/0.46 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------