TSTP Solution File: SWV002-1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : SWV002-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 03:13:15 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.85s 1.17s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.85s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_53,negated_conjecture,
less_than(a(j),a(k)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_5) ).
cnf(c_54,negated_conjecture,
( ~ less_than(a(X0),a(k))
| ~ less_than(X0,j)
| less_than(X0,i) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_6) ).
cnf(c_57,negated_conjecture,
~ less_than(q,i),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_9) ).
cnf(c_58,negated_conjecture,
~ less_than(j,q),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_10) ).
cnf(c_59,negated_conjecture,
less_than(a(q),a(j)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_11) ).
cnf(c_66,plain,
( ~ less_than(X0,X1)
| ~ less_than(X1,X2)
| less_than(X0,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV001-0.ax',transitivity_of_less_than) ).
cnf(c_67,plain,
( X0 = X1
| less_than(X0,X1)
| less_than(X1,X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV001-0.ax',all_related) ).
cnf(c_68,plain,
~ less_than(X0,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV001-0.ax',x_not_less_than_x) ).
cnf(c_322,plain,
a(q) = sP0_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_323,plain,
a(j) = sP1_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_326,plain,
a(k) = sP4_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_327,negated_conjecture,
less_than(sP0_iProver_def,sP1_iProver_def),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_323,c_322]) ).
cnf(c_328,negated_conjecture,
~ less_than(j,q),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_58]) ).
cnf(c_329,negated_conjecture,
~ less_than(q,i),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_57]) ).
cnf(c_332,negated_conjecture,
( ~ less_than(a(X0),sP4_iProver_def)
| ~ less_than(X0,j)
| less_than(X0,i) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_326]) ).
cnf(c_333,negated_conjecture,
less_than(sP1_iProver_def,sP4_iProver_def),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_53]) ).
cnf(c_724,plain,
( ~ less_than(q,j)
| ~ less_than(sP0_iProver_def,sP4_iProver_def)
| less_than(q,i) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_322,c_332]) ).
cnf(c_726,plain,
( ~ less_than(q,j)
| ~ less_than(sP0_iProver_def,sP4_iProver_def) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_724,c_329]) ).
cnf(c_834,plain,
( j = q
| less_than(q,j) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_67,c_328]) ).
cnf(c_1075,plain,
( ~ less_than(sP1_iProver_def,X0)
| less_than(sP0_iProver_def,X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_327,c_66]) ).
cnf(c_1209,plain,
less_than(sP0_iProver_def,sP4_iProver_def),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_333,c_1075]) ).
cnf(c_1213,plain,
~ less_than(q,j),
inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_726,c_1209]) ).
cnf(c_1214,plain,
j = q,
inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_834,c_1213]) ).
cnf(c_1218,plain,
a(j) = sP0_iProver_def,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_322,c_1214]) ).
cnf(c_1224,plain,
sP0_iProver_def = sP1_iProver_def,
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1218,c_323]) ).
cnf(c_1230,plain,
less_than(sP0_iProver_def,sP0_iProver_def),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_327,c_1224]) ).
cnf(c_1231,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1230,c_68]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : SWV002-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Fri May 3 00:05:44 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.47 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 2.85/1.17 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.85/1.17 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.85/1.17
% 2.85/1.17 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 2.85/1.17
% 2.85/1.17 ------ iProver source info
% 2.85/1.17
% 2.85/1.17 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 2.85/1.17 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 2.85/1.17 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.85/1.17
% 2.85/1.17 ------ Parsing...successful
% 2.85/1.17
% 2.85/1.17
% 2.85/1.17
% 2.85/1.17 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 2.85/1.17
% 2.85/1.17 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 2.85/1.17
% 2.85/1.17 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 2.85/1.17 ------ Proving...
% 2.85/1.17 ------ Problem Properties
% 2.85/1.17
% 2.85/1.17
% 2.85/1.17 clauses 26
% 2.85/1.17 conjectures 11
% 2.85/1.17 EPR 12
% 2.85/1.17 Horn 24
% 2.85/1.17 unary 18
% 2.85/1.17 binary 3
% 2.85/1.17 lits 40
% 2.85/1.17 lits eq 12
% 2.85/1.17 fd_pure 0
% 2.85/1.17 fd_pseudo 0
% 2.85/1.17 fd_cond 0
% 2.85/1.17 fd_pseudo_cond 3
% 2.85/1.17 AC symbols 0
% 2.85/1.17
% 2.85/1.17 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 2.85/1.17
% 2.85/1.17 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.85/1.17
% 2.85/1.17
% 2.85/1.17 ------
% 2.85/1.17 Current options:
% 2.85/1.17 ------
% 2.85/1.17
% 2.85/1.17
% 2.85/1.17
% 2.85/1.17
% 2.85/1.17 ------ Proving...
% 2.85/1.17
% 2.85/1.17
% 2.85/1.17 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.85/1.17
% 2.85/1.17 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.85/1.17
% 2.85/1.17
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------