TSTP Solution File: SWV002-1 by Metis---2.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Metis---2.4
% Problem : SWV002-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 20:29:47 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 13
% Number of leaves : 13
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 32 ( 15 unt; 3 nHn; 30 RR)
% Number of literals : 58 ( 21 equ; 26 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(transitivity_of_less_than,axiom,
( less_than(X,Z)
| ~ less_than(X,Y)
| ~ less_than(Y,Z) ) ).
cnf(all_related,axiom,
( less_than(X,Y)
| less_than(Y,X)
| X = Y ) ).
cnf(x_not_less_than_x,axiom,
~ less_than(X,X) ).
cnf(clause_5,negated_conjecture,
less_than(a(j),a(k)) ).
cnf(clause_6,negated_conjecture,
( less_than(X,i)
| ~ less_than(X,j)
| ~ less_than(a(X),a(k)) ) ).
cnf(clause_9,negated_conjecture,
~ less_than(q,i) ).
cnf(clause_10,negated_conjecture,
~ less_than(j,q) ).
cnf(clause_11,negated_conjecture,
less_than(a(q),a(j)) ).
cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
( less_than(j,q)
| less_than(q,j)
| j = q ),
inference(subst,[],[all_related:[bind(X,$fot(j)),bind(Y,$fot(q))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
( ~ less_than(a(q),a(k))
| ~ less_than(q,j)
| less_than(q,i) ),
inference(subst,[],[clause_6:[bind(X,$fot(q))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
( ~ less_than(a(j),X_20)
| ~ less_than(a(q),a(j))
| less_than(a(q),X_20) ),
inference(subst,[],[transitivity_of_less_than:[bind(X,$fot(a(q))),bind(Y,$fot(a(j))),bind(Z,$fot(X_20))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
( ~ less_than(a(j),X_20)
| less_than(a(q),X_20) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( less_than(a(q),a(j)) )],[clause_11,refute_0_2]) ).
cnf(refute_0_4,plain,
( ~ less_than(a(j),a(k))
| less_than(a(q),a(k)) ),
inference(subst,[],[refute_0_3:[bind(X_20,$fot(a(k)))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_5,plain,
less_than(a(q),a(k)),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( less_than(a(j),a(k)) )],[clause_5,refute_0_4]) ).
cnf(refute_0_6,plain,
( ~ less_than(q,j)
| less_than(q,i) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( less_than(a(q),a(k)) )],[refute_0_5,refute_0_1]) ).
cnf(refute_0_7,plain,
~ less_than(q,j),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( less_than(q,i) )],[refute_0_6,clause_9]) ).
cnf(refute_0_8,plain,
( less_than(j,q)
| j = q ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( less_than(q,j) )],[refute_0_0,refute_0_7]) ).
cnf(refute_0_9,plain,
j = q,
inference(resolve,[$cnf( less_than(j,q) )],[refute_0_8,clause_10]) ).
cnf(refute_0_10,plain,
X0 = X0,
introduced(tautology,[refl,[$fot(X0)]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_11,plain,
( X0 != X0
| X0 != Y0
| Y0 = X0 ),
introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( $equal(X0,X0) ),[0],$fot(Y0)]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_12,plain,
( X0 != Y0
| Y0 = X0 ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(X0,X0) )],[refute_0_10,refute_0_11]) ).
cnf(refute_0_13,plain,
( j != q
| q = j ),
inference(subst,[],[refute_0_12:[bind(X0,$fot(j)),bind(Y0,$fot(q))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_14,plain,
q = j,
inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(j,q) )],[refute_0_9,refute_0_13]) ).
cnf(refute_0_15,plain,
a(q) = a(q),
introduced(tautology,[refl,[$fot(a(q))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_16,plain,
( a(q) != a(q)
| q != j
| a(q) = a(j) ),
introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( $equal(a(q),a(q)) ),[1,0],$fot(j)]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_17,plain,
( q != j
| a(q) = a(j) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(a(q),a(q)) )],[refute_0_15,refute_0_16]) ).
cnf(refute_0_18,plain,
a(q) = a(j),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(q,j) )],[refute_0_14,refute_0_17]) ).
cnf(refute_0_19,plain,
( ~ less_than(a(q),a(j))
| a(q) != a(j)
| less_than(a(j),a(j)) ),
introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( less_than(a(q),a(j)) ),[0],$fot(a(j))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_20,plain,
( ~ less_than(a(q),a(j))
| less_than(a(j),a(j)) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(a(q),a(j)) )],[refute_0_18,refute_0_19]) ).
cnf(refute_0_21,plain,
less_than(a(j),a(j)),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( less_than(a(q),a(j)) )],[clause_11,refute_0_20]) ).
cnf(refute_0_22,plain,
~ less_than(a(j),a(j)),
inference(subst,[],[x_not_less_than_x:[bind(X,$fot(a(j)))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_23,plain,
$false,
inference(resolve,[$cnf( less_than(a(j),a(j)) )],[refute_0_21,refute_0_22]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWV002-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 14:10:24 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.34 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.19/0.41 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.41
% 0.19/0.41 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.41
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------