TSTP Solution File: SWC408-1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SWC408-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 22:00:52 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unknown 0.40s 0.58s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.07  % Problem  : SWC408-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.03/0.07  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.07/0.25  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.25  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.25  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.25  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.07/0.25  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.07/0.25  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.25  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.07/0.25  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 20:03:50 EDT 2022
% 0.07/0.25  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.30  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.10/0.30  The process was started by sandbox on n020.cluster.edu,
% 0.10/0.30  Sat Jun 11 20:03:50 2022
% 0.10/0.30  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 7050.
% 0.10/0.30  
% 0.10/0.30  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.10/0.30  set(auto).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.10/0.30  clear(print_given).
% 0.10/0.30  
% 0.10/0.30  list(usable).
% 0.10/0.30  
% 0.10/0.30  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.10/0.30  
% 0.10/0.30  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.10/0.30  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.10/0.30  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.10/0.30  clauses in usable.
% 0.10/0.30  
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.10/0.30  
% 0.10/0.30  ------------> process usable:
% 0.10/0.30    Following clause subsumed by 23 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssList(tl(A))|nil=A.
% 0.10/0.30    Following clause subsumed by 24 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssItem(hd(A))|nil=A.
% 0.10/0.30    Following clause subsumed by 67 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -leq(A,B)| -ssItem(B)| -ssItem(A)|lt(A,B)|A=B.
% 0.10/0.30  136 back subsumes 135.
% 0.10/0.30  146 back subsumes 140.
% 0.10/0.30  
% 0.10/0.30  ------------> process sos:
% 0.10/0.30    Following clause subsumed by 429 during input processing: 0 [copy,429,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.10/0.30  429 back subsumes 333.
% 0.10/0.30  429 back subsumes 277.
% 0.10/0.30  429 back subsumes 276.
% 0.10/0.30  429 back subsumes 275.
% 0.10/0.30  429 back subsumes 265.
% 0.10/0.30  429 back subsumes 252.
% 0.10/0.30  429 back subsumes 251.
% 0.10/0.30  429 back subsumes 250.
% 0.10/0.30  429 back subsumes 213.
% 0.10/0.30  429 back subsumes 201.
% 0.10/0.30  429 back subsumes 200.
% 0.10/0.30  429 back subsumes 199.
% 0.10/0.30  429 back subsumes 198.
% 0.10/0.30  429 back subsumes 181.
% 0.10/0.30  429 back subsumes 178.
% 0.10/0.30  429 back subsumes 176.
% 0.10/0.30  429 back subsumes 172.
% 0.10/0.30  429 back subsumes 169.
% 0.10/0.30  429 back subsumes 146.
% 0.10/0.30  429 back subsumes 145.
% 0.10/0.30  429 back subsumes 144.
% 0.10/0.30  429 back subsumes 143.
% 0.10/0.30  429 back subsumes 142.
% 0.10/0.30  429 back subsumes 134.
% 0.10/0.30  429 back subsumes 133.
% 0.10/0.30  
% 0.10/0.30  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.10/0.34  
% 0.10/0.34  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.10/0.34  
% 0.10/0.34  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.10/0.34  
% 0.10/0.34  
% 0.10/0.34  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.10/0.34  
% 0.10/0.34  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.10/0.34  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.10/0.34  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.10/0.34  number of clauses in intial UL: 335
% 0.10/0.34  number of clauses initially in problem: 398
% 0.10/0.34  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 84
% 0.10/0.34  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 95
% 0.10/0.34  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.10/0.34  absolute distinct symbol count: 74
% 0.10/0.34     distinct predicate count: 20
% 0.10/0.34     distinct function count: 46
% 0.10/0.34     distinct constant count: 8
% 0.10/0.34  
% 0.10/0.34  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.10/0.34  
% 0.10/0.34  
% 0.10/0.34  
% 0.10/0.34  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.40/0.58  
% 0.40/0.58  SEGMENTATION FAULT!!  This is probably caused by a
% 0.40/0.58  bug in Otter.  Please send copy of the input file to
% 0.40/0.58  otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 0.40/0.58  using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 0.40/0.58  
% 0.40/0.58  
% 0.40/0.58  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.40/0.58  
% 0.40/0.58  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.40/0.58  
% 0.40/0.58  Model 2 [ 1 1 694 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.40/0.58  
% 0.40/0.58  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.40/0.58  
% 0.40/0.58  true clauses given           1      (50.0%)
% 0.40/0.58  false clauses given          1
% 0.40/0.58  
% 0.40/0.58        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.40/0.58     2  7         4
% 0.40/0.58     3  39        4
% 0.40/0.58     4  7         0
% 0.40/0.58     5  2         0
% 0.40/0.58     7  0         6
% 0.40/0.58     9  0         5
% 0.40/0.58    11  0         10
% 0.40/0.58    12  0         8
% 0.40/0.58    13  0         5
% 0.40/0.58    14  0         2
% 0.40/0.58    15  0         6
% 0.40/0.58    16  0         4
% 0.40/0.58    17  0         4
% 0.40/0.58    19  0         2
% 0.40/0.58    21  0         6
% 0.40/0.58    22  0         2
% 0.40/0.58    23  0         2
% 0.40/0.58  tot:  55        70      (56.0% true)
% 0.40/0.58  
% 0.40/0.58  
% 0.40/0.58  Model 2 [ 1 1 694 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.40/0.58  
% 0.40/0.58  SEGMENTATION FAULT!!  This is probably caused by a
% 0.40/0.58  bug in Otter.  Please send copy of the input file to
% 0.40/0.58  otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 0.40/0.58  using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 0.40/0.58  
% 0.40/0.58  
% 0.40/0.58  The job finished Sat Jun 11 20:03:50 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------