TSTP Solution File: SWC406-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWC406-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 22:00:52 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.68s 0.88s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SWC406-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 10:28:24 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.45 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.20/0.45 The process was started by sandbox on n019.cluster.edu,
% 0.20/0.45 Sun Jun 12 10:28:24 2022
% 0.20/0.45 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 6038.
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.20/0.45 set(auto).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.20/0.45 clear(print_given).
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45 list(usable).
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.20/0.45 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.20/0.45 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.20/0.45 clauses in usable.
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45 ------------> process usable:
% 0.20/0.45 Following clause subsumed by 23 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssList(tl(A))|nil=A.
% 0.20/0.45 Following clause subsumed by 24 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssItem(hd(A))|nil=A.
% 0.20/0.45 Following clause subsumed by 67 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -leq(A,B)| -ssItem(B)| -ssItem(A)|lt(A,B)|A=B.
% 0.20/0.45 143 back subsumes 142.
% 0.20/0.45 153 back subsumes 147.
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45 ------------> process sos:
% 0.20/0.45 Following clause subsumed by 434 during input processing: 0 [copy,434,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.20/0.45 434 back subsumes 340.
% 0.20/0.45 434 back subsumes 284.
% 0.20/0.45 434 back subsumes 283.
% 0.20/0.45 434 back subsumes 282.
% 0.20/0.45 434 back subsumes 272.
% 0.20/0.45 434 back subsumes 259.
% 0.20/0.45 434 back subsumes 258.
% 0.20/0.45 434 back subsumes 257.
% 0.20/0.45 434 back subsumes 220.
% 0.20/0.45 434 back subsumes 208.
% 0.20/0.45 434 back subsumes 207.
% 0.20/0.45 434 back subsumes 206.
% 0.20/0.45 434 back subsumes 205.
% 0.20/0.45 434 back subsumes 188.
% 0.20/0.45 434 back subsumes 185.
% 0.20/0.45 434 back subsumes 183.
% 0.20/0.45 434 back subsumes 179.
% 0.20/0.45 434 back subsumes 176.
% 0.20/0.45 434 back subsumes 153.
% 0.20/0.45 434 back subsumes 152.
% 0.20/0.45 434 back subsumes 151.
% 0.20/0.45 434 back subsumes 150.
% 0.20/0.45 434 back subsumes 149.
% 0.20/0.45 434 back subsumes 141.
% 0.20/0.45 434 back subsumes 140.
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.51
% 0.20/0.51 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.51
% 0.20/0.51 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.51
% 0.20/0.51
% 0.20/0.51 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.51
% 0.20/0.51 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.51 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.51 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.51 number of clauses in intial UL: 335
% 0.20/0.51 number of clauses initially in problem: 402
% 0.20/0.51 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 83
% 0.20/0.51 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 94
% 0.20/0.51 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.51 absolute distinct symbol count: 75
% 0.20/0.51 distinct predicate count: 20
% 0.20/0.51 distinct function count: 47
% 0.20/0.51 distinct constant count: 8
% 0.20/0.51
% 0.20/0.51 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.51
% 0.20/0.51
% 0.20/0.51
% 0.20/0.51 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.68/0.88
% 0.68/0.88 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.68/0.88
% 0.68/0.88 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.68/0.88
% 0.68/0.88 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.68/0.88
% 0.68/0.88 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.68/0.88
% 0.68/0.88 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.68/0.88
% 0.68/0.88 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.68/0.88
% 0.68/0.88 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.68/0.88 app(app(sk1,nil),sk1)=app(sk1,app(nil,sk1)).
% 0.68/0.88
% 0.68/0.88 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 0.68/0.88 40 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 1277.3 K.
% 0.68/0.88 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 0.68/0.88 sym_ent ( 304) 183 0 183 0 54.3 K
% 0.68/0.88 term ( 32) 80610 74792 5818 10 182.1 K
% 0.68/0.88 rel ( 40) 57990 51709 6281 8 245.7 K
% 0.68/0.88 term_ptr ( 16) 24335 2690 21645 59 339.1 K
% 0.68/0.88 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.68/0.88 fpa_head ( 24) 2087 76 2011 5 47.2 K
% 0.68/0.88 fpa_tree ( 56) 10616 10616 0 20 1.1 K
% 0.68/0.88 context (1288) 16542 16542 0 11 13.8 K
% 0.68/0.88 trail ( 24) 99013 99013 0 6 0.1 K
% 0.68/0.88 imd_tree ( 32) 30 13 17 8 0.8 K
% 0.68/0.88 imd_pos (4024) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.68/0.88 is_tree ( 24) 1415 126 1289 31 30.9 K
% 0.68/0.88 is_pos (2424) 63406 63406 0 6 14.2 K
% 0.68/0.88 fsub_pos ( 16) 9051 9051 0 1 0.0 K
% 0.68/0.88 literal ( 32) 19283 15400 3883 1 121.4 K
% 0.68/0.88 clause ( 88) 3513 2563 950 1 81.7 K
% 0.68/0.88 list ( 272) 10 3 7 1 2.1 K
% 0.68/0.88 clash_nd ( 80) 5523 5523 0 9 0.7 K
% 0.68/0.88 clause_ptr ( 16) 870 111 759 6 12.0 K
% 0.68/0.88 int_ptr ( 16) 7939 4062 3877 6 60.7 K
% 0.68/0.88 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.68/0.88 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.68/0.88 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.68/0.88 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.68/0.88 formula( 40) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.68/0.88 formula_ptr( 16) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.68/0.88 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.68/0.88
% 0.68/0.88 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 0.68/0.88 .00
% 0.68/0.88 delete cl time 0.00
% 0.68/0.88 keep cl time 0.00
% 0.68/0.88 hints time 0.00
% 0.68/0.88 print_cl time 0.00
% 0.68/0.88 conflict time 0.00
% 0.68/0.88 new demod time 0.00
% 0.68/0.88 post_process time 0.00
% 0.68/0.88 back demod time 0.00
% 0.68/0.88 back subsume 0.00
% 0.68/0.88 factor time 0.00
% 0.68/0.88 FINDER time 0.00
% 0.68/0.88 unindex time 0.00
% 0.68/0.88
% 0.68/0.88 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.68/0.88
% 0.68/0.88 true clauses given 2 (28.6%)
% 0.68/0.88 false clauses given 5
% 0.68/0.88
% 0.68/0.88 FALSE TRUE
% 0.68/0.88 2 1 5
% 0.68/0.88 3 23 20
% 0.68/0.88 4 7 0
% 0.68/0.88 5 1 0
% 0.68/0.88 7 0 29
% 0.68/0.88 8 0 1
% 0.68/0.88 9 1 20
% 0.68/0.88 10 0 2
% 0.68/0.88 11 1 44
% 0.68/0.88 12 3 18
% 0.68/0.88 13 0 25
% 0.68/0.88 14 0 8
% 0.68/0.88 15 0 22
% 0.68/0.88 16 0 15
% 0.68/0.88 17 0 12
% 0.68/0.88 19 0 6
% 0.68/0.88 21 0 18
% 0.68/0.88 22 0 10
% 0.68/0.88 23 0 6
% 0.68/0.88 tot: 37 261 (87.6% true)
% 0.68/0.88
% 0.68/0.88
% 0.68/0.88 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.68/0.88
% 0.68/0.88 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 0.68/0.88 1:0 2:0 3:2 4:0 5:11 6:0 7:4 8:0 9:6 10:47
% 0.68/0.88 11:6 12:0 13:0 14:0 15:0 16:0 17:0 18:0 19:0 20:1
% 0.68/0.88 21:0 22:0 23:1 24:1 25:0 26:0 27:0 28:0 29:0 30:0
% 0.68/0.88 31:0 32:0 33:0 34:0 35:0 36:0 37:0 38:0 39:0 40:0
% 0.68/0.88 41:0 42:0 43:0 44:0 45:0 46:0 47:0 48:0 49:0 50:0
% 0.68/0.88 51:0 52:0 53:0 54:0 55:0 56:1 57:0 58:0 59:0 60:1
% 0.68/0.88 61:0 62:0 63:0 64:0 65:0 66:0 67:1 68:0 69:0 70:0
% 0.68/0.88 71:0 72:0 73:0 74:0 75:0 76:0 77:0 78:0 79:0 80:0
% 0.68/0.88 81:0 82:0 83:0 84:0 85:0 86:0 87:0 88:0 89:0 90:0
% 0.68/0.88 91:0 92:0 93:0 94:0 95:0 96:0 97:0 98:0 99:0
% 0.68/0.88 All others: 585.
% 0.68/0.88
% 0.68/0.88 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 0.68/0.88
% 0.68/0.88 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------