TSTP Solution File: SWC392-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : SWC392-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:29:27 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.52s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   18
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   58 (  20 unt;  16 nHn;  58 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  137 (  53 equ;  76 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   52 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(clause145,axiom,
    ( app(X1,X2) = nil
    | nil != X1
    | nil != X2
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause145) ).

cnf(clause98,axiom,
    ( cons(X1,X2) != nil
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause98) ).

cnf(clause157,axiom,
    ( cons(X1,app(X2,X3)) = app(cons(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause157) ).

cnf(clause85,axiom,
    ( ssList(app(X2,X1))
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause85) ).

cnf(clause8,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause8) ).

cnf(clause161,axiom,
    ( memberP(X2,X3)
    | X3 = X1
    | ~ memberP(cons(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | ~ ssItem(X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause161) ).

cnf(clause71,axiom,
    ( ~ memberP(nil,X1)
    | ~ ssItem(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause71) ).

cnf(clause120,axiom,
    ( app(cons(X1,nil),X2) = cons(X1,X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause120) ).

cnf(co1_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ memberP(sk2,sk5),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_9) ).

cnf(co1_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( cons(sk6,nil) = sk3
    | nil = sk3 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_15) ).

cnf(co1_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( ssItem(sk6)
    | nil = sk3 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_11) ).

cnf(co1_8,negated_conjecture,
    memberP(sk1,sk5),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_8) ).

cnf(co1_6,negated_conjecture,
    sk1 = sk3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).

cnf(co1_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( cons(sk6,nil) = sk3
    | nil = sk4 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_12) ).

cnf(co1_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( ssItem(sk6)
    | nil = sk4 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_10) ).

cnf(co1_5,negated_conjecture,
    sk2 = sk4,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).

cnf(co1_7,negated_conjecture,
    ssItem(sk5),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).

cnf(co1_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( memberP(sk4,sk6)
    | nil = sk3 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_16) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( app(X1,X2) = nil
    | nil != X1
    | nil != X2
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause145]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( cons(X1,X2) != nil
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause98]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( cons(X1,app(X2,X3)) = app(cons(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause157]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ssList(app(X2,X1))
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause85]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( app(X1,X2) = nil
    | nil != X1
    | nil != X2
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    c_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_23,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    clause8 ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( memberP(X2,X3)
    | X3 = X1
    | ~ memberP(cons(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | ~ ssItem(X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause161]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ memberP(nil,X1)
    | ~ ssItem(X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause71]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( cons(X1,X2) != nil
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2) ),
    c_0_19 ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( cons(X1,app(X2,X3)) = app(cons(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X3) ),
    c_0_20 ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ssList(app(X2,X1))
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2) ),
    c_0_21 ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    app(nil,nil) = nil,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_22])]),c_0_23])]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( app(cons(X1,nil),X2) = cons(X1,X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause120]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ~ memberP(sk2,sk5),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( memberP(X2,X3)
    | X3 = X1
    | ~ memberP(cons(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | ~ ssItem(X3) ),
    c_0_24 ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ( cons(sk6,nil) = sk3
    | nil = sk3 ),
    co1_15 ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( ssItem(sk6)
    | nil = sk3 ),
    co1_11 ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( ~ memberP(nil,X1)
    | ~ ssItem(X1) ),
    c_0_25 ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    memberP(sk1,sk5),
    co1_8 ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    sk1 = sk3,
    co1_6 ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( app(cons(X1,X2),X3) != nil
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssList(X2) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( app(cons(X1,nil),nil) = cons(X1,nil)
    | ~ ssItem(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_29]),c_0_23])]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ( app(cons(X1,nil),X2) = cons(X1,X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2) ),
    c_0_30 ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ( cons(sk6,nil) = sk3
    | nil = sk4 ),
    co1_12 ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ( ssItem(sk6)
    | nil = sk4 ),
    co1_10 ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    ~ memberP(sk2,sk5),
    c_0_31 ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    sk2 = sk4,
    co1_5 ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    ( sk3 = nil
    | sk6 = X1
    | ~ memberP(sk3,X1)
    | ~ ssItem(X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_23])]),c_0_34]),c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    memberP(sk3,sk5),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    ssItem(sk5),
    co1_7 ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    ( cons(X1,nil) != nil
    | ~ ssItem(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]),c_0_23])]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    ( cons(sk6,X1) = app(sk3,X1)
    | sk4 = nil
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]),c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    ~ memberP(sk4,sk5),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    ( sk5 = sk6
    | sk3 = nil ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]),c_0_47])]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
    ( memberP(sk4,sk6)
    | nil = sk3 ),
    co1_16 ).

cnf(c_0_53,negated_conjecture,
    ( sk4 = nil
    | app(sk3,nil) != nil ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_49]),c_0_23])]),c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
    sk3 = nil,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51]),c_0_52]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
    sk4 = nil,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_54]),c_0_29])]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
    ~ memberP(nil,sk5),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_55]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_54]),c_0_56]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem    : SWC392-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 03:18:38 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.48  Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.52  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.21/0.52  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.52  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # new_bool_3 with pid 27998 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.21/0.52  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.52  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.52  # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.52  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 28001 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.21/0.52  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.52  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.52  # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.52  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.52  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.52  
% 0.21/0.52  # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.52  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.52  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.52  # Parsed axioms                        : 202
% 0.21/0.52  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 149
% 0.21/0.52  # Initial clauses                      : 53
% 0.21/0.52  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 53
% 0.21/0.52  # Processed clauses                    : 334
% 0.21/0.52  # ...of these trivial                  : 4
% 0.21/0.52  # ...subsumed                          : 155
% 0.21/0.52  # ...remaining for further processing  : 174
% 0.21/0.52  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 9
% 0.21/0.52  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Backward-rewritten                   : 68
% 0.21/0.52  # Generated clauses                    : 497
% 0.21/0.52  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 402
% 0.21/0.52  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 40
% 0.21/0.52  # Paramodulations                      : 485
% 0.21/0.52  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Equation resolutions                 : 13
% 0.21/0.52  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Total rewrite steps                  : 546
% 0.21/0.52  # ...of those cached                   : 537
% 0.21/0.52  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.21/0.52  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.21/0.52  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.52  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.52  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.52  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.21/0.52  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52  # Current number of processed clauses  : 53
% 0.21/0.52  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 7
% 0.21/0.52  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.52  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.21/0.52  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 45
% 0.21/0.52  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 170
% 0.21/0.52  # ...number of literals in the above   : 915
% 0.21/0.52  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Current number of archived clauses   : 117
% 0.21/0.52  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1724
% 0.21/0.52  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 902
% 0.21/0.52  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 195
% 0.21/0.52  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15
% 0.21/0.52  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.21/0.52  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.21/0.52  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 10890
% 0.21/0.52  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 897
% 0.21/0.52  
% 0.21/0.52  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52  # User time                : 0.021 s
% 0.21/0.52  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.52  # Total time               : 0.026 s
% 0.21/0.52  # Maximum resident set size: 2064 pages
% 0.21/0.52  
% 0.21/0.52  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52  # User time                : 0.027 s
% 0.21/0.52  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.52  # Total time               : 0.032 s
% 0.21/0.52  # Maximum resident set size: 1876 pages
% 0.21/0.52  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------