TSTP Solution File: SWC391+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SWC391+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 22:00:47 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.51s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : SWC391+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 16:00:55 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.20/0.51  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.51  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.20/0.51  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.20/0.51  The process was started by sandbox2 on n010.cluster.edu,
% 0.20/0.51  Sun Jun 12 16:00:55 2022
% 0.20/0.51  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 11336.
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.20/0.51  set(auto).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.20/0.51  clear(print_given).
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  formula_list(usable).
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.20/0.51  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.20/0.51  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.20/0.51  clauses in usable.
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  ------------> process usable:
% 0.20/0.51    Following clause subsumed by 177 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssItem(A)| -ssItem(B)|lt(A,B)|A=B| -leq(A,B).
% 0.20/0.51  301 back subsumes 257.
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  ------------> process sos:
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.14 sec ----> 458 [binary,457.1,455.1] {-} $F.
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  Length of proof is 3.  Level of proof is 2.
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.20/0.51  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.51  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  182 [] {-} -memberP($c6,$c3).
% 0.20/0.51  447,446 [] {-} $c6=$c4.
% 0.20/0.51  449,448 [] {-} $c7=$c5.
% 0.20/0.51  450 [] {-} $c4=$c5.
% 0.20/0.51  452,451 [copy,450,flip.1] {-} $c5=$c4.
% 0.20/0.51  454 [] {-} memberP($c7,$c3).
% 0.20/0.51  455 [copy,454,demod,449,452] {-} memberP($c4,$c3).
% 0.20/0.51  457 [back_demod,182,demod,447] {-} -memberP($c4,$c3).
% 0.20/0.51  458 [binary,457.1,455.1] {-} $F.
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.20/0.51  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  ============ end of search ============
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  Process 11336 finished Sun Jun 12 16:00:55 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------