TSTP Solution File: SWC381+1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SWC381+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 21:58:32 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.47s 0.63s
% Output   : Refutation 0.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   12 (   7 unt;   0 nHn;  12 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   20 (   6 equ;  10 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    2 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(192,negated_conjecture,
    'SKOLEMAAAW49' = 'SKOLEMAAAW51',
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

cnf(193,negated_conjecture,
    'SKOLEMAAAW48' = 'SKOLEMAAAW50',
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

cnf(194,negated_conjecture,
    neq('SKOLEMAAAW49',nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

cnf(195,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssItem(X)
    | cons(X,nil) != 'SKOLEMAAAW48'
    | ~ memberP('SKOLEMAAAW49',X)
    | ~ neq('SKOLEMAAAW51',nil) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

cnf(196,plain,
    ( ~ ssItem(X)
    | cons(X,nil) != 'SKOLEMAAAW48'
    | ~ memberP('SKOLEMAAAW49',X) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[195,194,192,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(197,negated_conjecture,
    ( ssItem('SKOLEMAAAW52')
    | ~ neq('SKOLEMAAAW51',nil) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

cnf(198,plain,
    ssItem('SKOLEMAAAW52'),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[197,194,192,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(199,negated_conjecture,
    ( cons('SKOLEMAAAW52',nil) = 'SKOLEMAAAW50'
    | ~ neq('SKOLEMAAAW51',nil) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

cnf(200,plain,
    cons('SKOLEMAAAW52',nil) = 'SKOLEMAAAW48',
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[199,194,192,193,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(201,negated_conjecture,
    ( memberP('SKOLEMAAAW51','SKOLEMAAAW52')
    | ~ neq('SKOLEMAAAW51',nil) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

cnf(202,plain,
    memberP('SKOLEMAAAW49','SKOLEMAAAW52'),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[201,194,192,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(369,plain,
    $false,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[196,198,200,202]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : SWC381+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 22:51:49 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.48  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.49  * 
% 0.22/0.49  * 
% 0.22/0.49  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.22/0.49  * 
% 0.22/0.49  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.22/0.49  * 
% 0.22/0.49  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.22/0.49   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.22/0.49   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.22/0.49   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.22/0.49   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.22/0.49   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.22/0.49   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.22/0.49   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.22/0.49   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.22/0.49   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.22/0.49   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.22/0.49   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.22/0.49   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.22/0.49  * 
% 0.22/0.49  "."
% 0.22/0.49  * 
% 0.22/0.49  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-11T22:51:49
% 0.22/0.49  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n024.cluster.edu at 2022-06-11T22:51:49
% 0.47/0.63  
% 0.47/0.63  
% 0.47/0.63  #||
% 0.47/0.63  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/0.63  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.47/0.63  ||#
% 0.47/0.63  
% 0.47/0.63  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.47/0.63  ;       575 formulas have been input or derived (from 116 formulas).
% 0.47/0.63  ;       369 (64%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.47/0.63  ;           22 ( 6%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.47/0.63  ;          347 (94%) are still being kept.
% 0.47/0.63  ; 
% 0.47/0.63  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.47/0.63  ;     0.027  20%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     0.009   7%   Assert                       (96 calls)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     0.027  20%   Process new row              (563 calls)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     0.014  11%   Resolution                   (230 calls)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     0.004   3%   Paramodulation               (115 calls)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     0.005   4%   Condensing                   (232 calls)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     0.005   4%   Forward subsumption          (232 calls)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     0.005   4%   Backward subsumption         (231 calls)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     0.001   1%   Clause clause subsumption    (67 calls)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     0.009   7%   Forward simplification       (563 calls)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     0.000   0%   Backward simplification      (365 calls)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     0.000   0%   Ordering                     (117 calls)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     0.026  20%   Other
% 0.47/0.63  ;     0.132        Total
% 0.47/0.63  ;     0.133        Real time
% 0.47/0.63  ; 
% 0.47/0.63  ; Term-hash-array has 565 terms in all.
% 0.47/0.63  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 219 entries (225 at peak, 231 added, 12 deleted).
% 0.47/0.63  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 715 nodes (732 at peak, 744 added, 29 deleted).
% 0.47/0.63  ;  Retrieved 116 possibly forward subsuming rows in 232 calls.
% 0.47/0.63  ;  Retrieved 86 possibly backward subsumed rows in 231 calls.
% 0.47/0.63  ; Path-index has 567 entries (567 at peak, 597 added, 30 deleted).
% 0.47/0.63  ; Path-index has 1,144 nodes (1,144 at peak, 1,174 added, 30 deleted).
% 0.47/0.63  ; Trie-index has 567 entries (567 at peak, 597 added, 30 deleted).
% 0.47/0.63  ; Trie-index has 1,213 nodes (1,213 at peak, 1,243 added, 30 deleted).
% 0.47/0.63  ; Retrieved 232 generalization terms in 972 calls.
% 0.47/0.63  ; Retrieved 133 instance terms in 133 calls.
% 0.47/0.63  ; Retrieved 20,930 unifiable terms in 1,438 calls.
% 0.47/0.63  ; 
% 0.47/0.63  ; The agenda of rows to process has 4 entries:
% 0.47/0.63  ;     1 with value 4               1 with value 8                1 with value 12
% 0.47/0.63  ;     1 with value 5
% 0.47/0.63  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 81 entries:
% 0.47/0.63  ;     3 with value 15              9 with value 21               6 with value 27
% 0.47/0.63  ;     9 with value 16              5 with value 22               1 with value 29
% 0.47/0.63  ;     4 with value 17              2 with value 23               1 with value 32
% 0.47/0.63  ;     7 with value 18              3 with value 24               1 with value 35
% 0.47/0.63  ;     2 with value 19              8 with value 25               3 with value 40
% 0.47/0.63  ;    11 with value 20              3 with value 26               3 with value 44
% 0.47/0.63  ; The agenda of rows to give has 150 entries:
% 0.47/0.63  ;     7 with value (4 4)          26 with value (4 7)           40 with value (4 9)
% 0.47/0.63  ;    43 with value (4 5)          23 with value (4 8)            3 with value (4 11)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     8 with value (4 6)
% 0.47/0.63  Evaluation took:
% 0.47/0.63    0.134 seconds of real time
% 0.47/0.63    0.11955 seconds of user run time
% 0.47/0.63    0.014418 seconds of system run time
% 0.47/0.63    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.47/0.63    0 page faults and
% 0.47/0.63    7,312,600 bytes consed.
% 0.47/0.63  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.47/0.63  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-11T22:51:49
% 0.47/0.63  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.47/0.63  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------