TSTP Solution File: SWC380-1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SWC380-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:38:34 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.71s 0.90s
% Output : Refutation 0.71s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 36 ( 15 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 79 ( 12 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 92 ( 49 ~; 43 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 16 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f375,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f374,f259]) ).
fof(f259,plain,
memberP(sk3,sk5),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f258,f8]) ).
fof(f8,axiom,
ssList(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause8) ).
fof(f258,plain,
( memberP(sk3,sk5)
| ~ ssList(nil) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f243,f226]) ).
fof(f226,plain,
ssItem(sk5),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f200,f224]) ).
fof(f224,plain,
neq(sk4,nil),
inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f206]) ).
fof(f206,plain,
( neq(sk4,nil)
| neq(sk4,nil) ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f192,f190,f190]) ).
fof(f190,axiom,
sk2 = sk4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).
fof(f192,axiom,
( neq(sk2,nil)
| neq(sk2,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).
fof(f200,axiom,
( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
| ssItem(sk5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_15) ).
fof(f243,plain,
( memberP(sk3,sk5)
| ~ ssItem(sk5)
| ~ ssList(nil) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f222,f228]) ).
fof(f228,plain,
sk3 = cons(sk5,nil),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f202,f224]) ).
fof(f202,axiom,
( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
| sk3 = cons(sk5,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_17) ).
fof(f222,plain,
! [X2,X1] :
( memberP(cons(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2) ),
inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f217]) ).
fof(f217,plain,
! [X2,X1] :
( memberP(cons(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2) ),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f138]) ).
fof(f138,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( memberP(cons(X1,X2),X0)
| ~ ssItem(X0)
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| X0 != X1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause138) ).
fof(f374,plain,
~ memberP(sk3,sk5),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f372,f226]) ).
fof(f372,plain,
( ~ ssItem(sk5)
| ~ memberP(sk3,sk5) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f370,f276]) ).
fof(f276,plain,
! [X0] :
( memberP(sk4,X0)
| ~ ssItem(X0)
| ~ memberP(sk3,X0) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f275,f227]) ).
fof(f227,plain,
ssList(sk6),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f201,f224]) ).
fof(f201,axiom,
( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
| ssList(sk6) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_16) ).
fof(f275,plain,
! [X0] :
( memberP(sk4,X0)
| ~ ssItem(X0)
| ~ ssList(sk6)
| ~ memberP(sk3,X0) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f263,f204]) ).
fof(f204,plain,
ssList(sk3),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f186,f191]) ).
fof(f191,axiom,
sk1 = sk3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).
fof(f186,axiom,
ssList(sk1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_1) ).
fof(f263,plain,
! [X0] :
( memberP(sk4,X0)
| ~ ssItem(X0)
| ~ ssList(sk3)
| ~ ssList(sk6)
| ~ memberP(sk3,X0) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f140,f230]) ).
fof(f230,plain,
sk4 = app(sk3,sk6),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f229,f228]) ).
fof(f229,plain,
sk4 = app(cons(sk5,nil),sk6),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f203,f224]) ).
fof(f203,axiom,
( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
| sk4 = app(cons(sk5,nil),sk6) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_18) ).
fof(f140,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( memberP(app(X0,X2),X1)
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssList(X0)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ memberP(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause140) ).
fof(f370,plain,
~ memberP(sk4,sk5),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f369,f226]) ).
fof(f369,plain,
( ~ memberP(sk4,sk5)
| ~ ssItem(sk5) ),
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f367]) ).
fof(f367,plain,
( sk3 != sk3
| ~ memberP(sk4,sk5)
| ~ ssItem(sk5) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f225,f228]) ).
fof(f225,plain,
! [X6] :
( sk3 != cons(X6,nil)
| ~ memberP(sk4,X6)
| ~ ssItem(X6) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f213,f224]) ).
fof(f213,plain,
! [X6] :
( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
| ~ memberP(sk4,X6)
| sk3 != cons(X6,nil)
| ~ ssItem(X6) ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f199,f190,f191]) ).
fof(f199,axiom,
! [X6] :
( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
| ~ memberP(sk2,X6)
| sk1 != cons(X6,nil)
| ~ ssItem(X6) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_14) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SWC380-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.16 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.16/0.39 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.39 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.39 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.39 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.39 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.39 % DateTime : Sun May 19 02:44:38 EDT 2024
% 0.16/0.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.39 This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN problem
% 0.16/0.40 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.71/0.90 % (24841)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.71/0.90 % (24839)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.71/0.90 % (24840)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.71/0.90 % (24842)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.71/0.90 % (24843)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.71/0.90 % (24844)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.71/0.90 % (24845)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.71/0.90 % (24846)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.71/0.90 % (24846)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (24846)------------------------------
% 0.71/0.90 % (24846)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.71/0.90 % (24846)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.71/0.90
% 0.71/0.90 % (24846)Memory used [KB]: 1186
% 0.71/0.90 % (24846)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.71/0.90 % (24846)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.71/0.90 % (24846)------------------------------
% 0.71/0.90 % (24846)------------------------------
% 0.71/0.90 % (24844)First to succeed.
% 0.71/0.90 % (24841)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.71/0.90 % (24844)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-24838"
% 0.71/0.90 % (24843)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (24843)------------------------------
% 0.71/0.90 % (24843)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.71/0.90 % (24844)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.71/0.90 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.71/0.90 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.71/0.90 % (24844)------------------------------
% 0.71/0.90 % (24844)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.71/0.90 % (24844)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.71/0.90
% 0.71/0.90 % (24844)Memory used [KB]: 1215
% 0.71/0.90 % (24844)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.71/0.90 % (24844)Instructions burned: 9 (million)
% 0.71/0.90 % (24838)Success in time 0.497 s
% 0.75/0.90 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------