TSTP Solution File: SWC372+1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SWC372+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:38:31 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.57s 0.76s
% Output : Refutation 0.57s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 30 ( 16 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 128 ( 35 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 19 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 148 ( 50 ~; 45 |; 36 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 17 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 25 ( 6 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 58 ( 40 !; 18 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1544,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f1543,f250]) ).
fof(f250,plain,
~ segmentP(sK3,sK2),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f173,f171,f172]) ).
fof(f172,plain,
sK0 = sK2,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f99]) ).
fof(f99,plain,
? [X0] :
( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ( nil != X2
| nil = X3 )
& ~ segmentP(X1,X0)
& ? [X4] :
( ! [X5] :
( ! [X6] :
( ! [X7] :
( ! [X8] :
( ~ lt(X7,X5)
| app(X8,cons(X7,nil)) != X2
| ~ ssList(X8) )
| ~ ssItem(X7) )
| app(cons(X5,nil),X6) != X4
| ~ ssList(X6) )
| ~ ssItem(X5) )
& strictorderedP(X2)
& app(X2,X4) = X3
& ssList(X4) )
& X0 = X2
& X1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(X1) )
& ssList(X0) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f98]) ).
fof(f98,plain,
? [X0] :
( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ( nil != X2
| nil = X3 )
& ~ segmentP(X1,X0)
& ? [X4] :
( ! [X5] :
( ! [X6] :
( ! [X7] :
( ! [X8] :
( ~ lt(X7,X5)
| app(X8,cons(X7,nil)) != X2
| ~ ssList(X8) )
| ~ ssItem(X7) )
| app(cons(X5,nil),X6) != X4
| ~ ssList(X6) )
| ~ ssItem(X5) )
& strictorderedP(X2)
& app(X2,X4) = X3
& ssList(X4) )
& X0 = X2
& X1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(X1) )
& ssList(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).
fof(f97,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0] :
( ssList(X0)
=> ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ( ( nil = X2
& nil != X3 )
| segmentP(X1,X0)
| ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( ? [X5] :
( ? [X6] :
( ? [X7] :
( ? [X8] :
( lt(X7,X5)
& app(X8,cons(X7,nil)) = X2
& ssList(X8) )
& ssItem(X7) )
& app(cons(X5,nil),X6) = X4
& ssList(X6) )
& ssItem(X5) )
| ~ strictorderedP(X2)
| app(X2,X4) != X3 ) )
| X0 != X2
| X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f96]) ).
fof(f96,conjecture,
! [X0] :
( ssList(X0)
=> ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ( ( nil = X2
& nil != X3 )
| segmentP(X1,X0)
| ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( ? [X5] :
( ? [X6] :
( ? [X7] :
( ? [X8] :
( lt(X7,X5)
& app(X8,cons(X7,nil)) = X2
& ssList(X8) )
& ssItem(X7) )
& app(cons(X5,nil),X6) = X4
& ssList(X6) )
& ssItem(X5) )
| ~ strictorderedP(X2)
| app(X2,X4) != X3 ) )
| X0 != X2
| X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).
fof(f171,plain,
sK1 = sK3,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f99]) ).
fof(f173,plain,
~ segmentP(sK1,sK0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f99]) ).
fof(f1543,plain,
segmentP(sK3,sK2),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f1542,f167]) ).
fof(f167,plain,
sK3 = app(sK2,sK4),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f99]) ).
fof(f1542,plain,
segmentP(app(sK2,sK4),sK2),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f1502,f425]) ).
fof(f425,plain,
sK2 = app(nil,sK2),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f248,f197]) ).
fof(f197,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ ssList(X0)
| app(nil,X0) = X0 ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f116]) ).
fof(f116,plain,
! [X0] :
( app(nil,X0) = X0
| ~ ssList(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).
fof(f28,axiom,
! [X0] :
( ssList(X0)
=> app(nil,X0) = X0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax28) ).
fof(f248,plain,
ssList(sK2),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f176,f172]) ).
fof(f176,plain,
ssList(sK0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f99]) ).
fof(f1502,plain,
segmentP(app(app(nil,sK2),sK4),sK2),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f166,f199,f248,f248,f433,f203]) ).
fof(f203,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( segmentP(app(app(X2,X0),X3),X1)
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X3)
| ~ segmentP(X0,X1)
| ~ ssList(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f121]) ).
fof(f121,plain,
! [X0] :
( ! [X1] :
( ! [X2] :
( ! [X3] :
( segmentP(app(app(X2,X0),X3),X1)
| ~ segmentP(X0,X1)
| ~ ssList(X3) )
| ~ ssList(X2) )
| ~ ssList(X1) )
| ~ ssList(X0) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f120]) ).
fof(f120,plain,
! [X0] :
( ! [X1] :
( ! [X2] :
( ! [X3] :
( segmentP(app(app(X2,X0),X3),X1)
| ~ segmentP(X0,X1)
| ~ ssList(X3) )
| ~ ssList(X2) )
| ~ ssList(X1) )
| ~ ssList(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f56]) ).
fof(f56,axiom,
! [X0] :
( ssList(X0)
=> ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ( segmentP(X0,X1)
=> segmentP(app(app(X2,X0),X3),X1) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax56) ).
fof(f433,plain,
segmentP(sK2,sK2),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f248,f204]) ).
fof(f204,plain,
! [X0] :
( segmentP(X0,X0)
| ~ ssList(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f122]) ).
fof(f122,plain,
! [X0] :
( segmentP(X0,X0)
| ~ ssList(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f55]) ).
fof(f55,axiom,
! [X0] :
( ssList(X0)
=> segmentP(X0,X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax55) ).
fof(f199,plain,
ssList(nil),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).
fof(f17,axiom,
ssList(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax17) ).
fof(f166,plain,
ssList(sK4),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f99]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09 % Problem : SWC372+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.09/0.11 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.09/0.31 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.31 % DateTime : Sun May 19 02:40:38 EDT 2024
% 0.09/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.31 This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.09/0.31 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/0.74 % (2485)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.57/0.74 % (2489)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.57/0.74 % (2483)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.57/0.74 % (2486)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.57/0.74 % (2488)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.57/0.74 % (2487)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.57/0.74 % (2482)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.57/0.75 % (2484)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.57/0.75 % (2486)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.57/0.75 % (2486)------------------------------
% 0.57/0.75 % (2486)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.57/0.75 % (2486)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.57/0.75 % (2486)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.57/0.75
% 0.57/0.75 % (2486)Memory used [KB]: 1913
% 0.57/0.75 % (2486)Time elapsed: 0.018 s
% 0.57/0.75 % (2486)Instructions burned: 34 (million)
% 0.57/0.75 % (2486)------------------------------
% 0.57/0.75 % (2486)------------------------------
% 0.57/0.76 % (2485)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.57/0.76 % (2485)------------------------------
% 0.57/0.76 % (2485)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.57/0.76 % (2485)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.57/0.76 % (2485)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.57/0.76
% 0.57/0.76 % (2485)Memory used [KB]: 1732
% 0.57/0.76 % (2485)Time elapsed: 0.020 s
% 0.57/0.76 % (2485)Instructions burned: 34 (million)
% 0.57/0.76 % (2485)------------------------------
% 0.57/0.76 % (2485)------------------------------
% 0.57/0.76 % (2488)First to succeed.
% 0.57/0.76 % (2488)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-2481"
% 0.57/0.76 % (2490)lrs+21_1:16_sil=2000:sp=occurrence:urr=on:flr=on:i=55:sd=1:nm=0:ins=3:ss=included:rawr=on:br=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/55Mi)
% 0.57/0.76 % (2488)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.57/0.76 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.57/0.76 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.57/0.76 % (2488)------------------------------
% 0.57/0.76 % (2488)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.57/0.76 % (2488)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.57/0.76
% 0.57/0.76 % (2488)Memory used [KB]: 1571
% 0.57/0.76 % (2488)Time elapsed: 0.021 s
% 0.57/0.76 % (2488)Instructions burned: 58 (million)
% 0.57/0.76 % (2481)Success in time 0.427 s
% 0.57/0.76 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------