TSTP Solution File: SWC371-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWC371-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 22:00:41 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 300.05s 300.22s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWC371-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 15:23:08 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.41 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.20/0.41 The process was started by sandbox on n009.cluster.edu,
% 0.20/0.41 Sun Jun 12 15:23:08 2022
% 0.20/0.41 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 10034.
% 0.20/0.41
% 0.20/0.41 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.20/0.41 set(auto).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.20/0.41 clear(print_given).
% 0.20/0.41
% 0.20/0.41 list(usable).
% 0.20/0.41
% 0.20/0.41 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.20/0.41
% 0.20/0.41 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.20/0.41 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.20/0.41 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.20/0.41 clauses in usable.
% 0.20/0.41
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.20/0.41
% 0.20/0.41 ------------> process usable:
% 0.20/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 23 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssList(tl(A))|nil=A.
% 0.20/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 24 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssItem(hd(A))|nil=A.
% 0.20/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 67 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -leq(A,B)| -ssItem(B)| -ssItem(A)|lt(A,B)|A=B.
% 0.20/0.41 139 back subsumes 138.
% 0.20/0.41 149 back subsumes 143.
% 0.20/0.41
% 0.20/0.41 ------------> process sos:
% 0.20/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 437 during input processing: 0 [copy,437,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.20/0.41 437 back subsumes 339.
% 0.20/0.41 437 back subsumes 282.
% 0.20/0.41 437 back subsumes 281.
% 0.20/0.41 437 back subsumes 280.
% 0.20/0.41 437 back subsumes 270.
% 0.20/0.41 437 back subsumes 257.
% 0.20/0.41 437 back subsumes 256.
% 0.20/0.41 437 back subsumes 255.
% 0.20/0.41 437 back subsumes 216.
% 0.20/0.41 437 back subsumes 204.
% 0.20/0.41 437 back subsumes 203.
% 0.20/0.41 437 back subsumes 202.
% 0.20/0.41 437 back subsumes 201.
% 0.20/0.41 437 back subsumes 184.
% 0.20/0.41 437 back subsumes 181.
% 0.20/0.41 437 back subsumes 179.
% 0.20/0.41 437 back subsumes 175.
% 0.20/0.41 437 back subsumes 172.
% 0.20/0.41 437 back subsumes 149.
% 0.20/0.41 437 back subsumes 148.
% 0.20/0.41 437 back subsumes 147.
% 0.20/0.41 437 back subsumes 146.
% 0.20/0.41 437 back subsumes 145.
% 0.20/0.41 437 back subsumes 137.
% 0.20/0.41 437 back subsumes 136.
% 0.20/0.41
% 0.20/0.41 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.45 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.45 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.45 number of clauses in intial UL: 335
% 0.20/0.45 number of clauses initially in problem: 403
% 0.20/0.45 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 83
% 0.20/0.45 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 95
% 0.20/0.45 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.45 absolute distinct symbol count: 74
% 0.20/0.45 distinct predicate count: 20
% 0.20/0.45 distinct function count: 46
% 0.20/0.45 distinct constant count: 8
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45 =========== start of search ===========
% 300.05/300.22 Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------