TSTP Solution File: SWC360+1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : SWC360+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 03:12:09 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 1.28s 1.22s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.28s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 191 ( 28 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 30 ( 11 avg)
% Number of connectives : 254 ( 80 ~; 56 |; 106 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 12 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 17 ( 8 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 45 ( 0 sgn 19 !; 26 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f96,conjecture,
! [X0] :
( ssList(X0)
=> ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ( segmentP(X1,X0)
| ? [X4] :
( totalorderedP(X4)
& segmentP(X4,X2)
& segmentP(X3,X4)
& neq(X2,X4)
& ssList(X4) )
| ~ totalorderedP(X2)
| ~ segmentP(X3,X2)
| ~ neq(X1,nil)
| X0 != X2
| X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).
fof(f97,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0] :
( ssList(X0)
=> ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ( segmentP(X1,X0)
| ? [X4] :
( totalorderedP(X4)
& segmentP(X4,X2)
& segmentP(X3,X4)
& neq(X2,X4)
& ssList(X4) )
| ~ totalorderedP(X2)
| ~ segmentP(X3,X2)
| ~ neq(X1,nil)
| X0 != X2
| X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f96]) ).
fof(f221,plain,
? [X0] :
( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ~ segmentP(X1,X0)
& ! [X4] :
( ~ totalorderedP(X4)
| ~ segmentP(X4,X2)
| ~ segmentP(X3,X4)
| ~ neq(X2,X4)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& totalorderedP(X2)
& segmentP(X3,X2)
& neq(X1,nil)
& X0 = X2
& X1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(X1) )
& ssList(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).
fof(f222,plain,
? [X0] :
( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ~ segmentP(X1,X0)
& ! [X4] :
( ~ totalorderedP(X4)
| ~ segmentP(X4,X2)
| ~ segmentP(X3,X4)
| ~ neq(X2,X4)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& totalorderedP(X2)
& segmentP(X3,X2)
& neq(X1,nil)
& X0 = X2
& X1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(X1) )
& ssList(X0) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f221]) ).
fof(f343,plain,
( ? [X0] :
( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ~ segmentP(X1,X0)
& ! [X4] :
( ~ totalorderedP(X4)
| ~ segmentP(X4,X2)
| ~ segmentP(X3,X4)
| ~ neq(X2,X4)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& totalorderedP(X2)
& segmentP(X3,X2)
& neq(X1,nil)
& X0 = X2
& X1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(X1) )
& ssList(X0) )
=> ( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ~ segmentP(X1,sK53)
& ! [X4] :
( ~ totalorderedP(X4)
| ~ segmentP(X4,X2)
| ~ segmentP(X3,X4)
| ~ neq(X2,X4)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& totalorderedP(X2)
& segmentP(X3,X2)
& neq(X1,nil)
& sK53 = X2
& X1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(X1) )
& ssList(sK53) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f344,plain,
( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ~ segmentP(X1,sK53)
& ! [X4] :
( ~ totalorderedP(X4)
| ~ segmentP(X4,X2)
| ~ segmentP(X3,X4)
| ~ neq(X2,X4)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& totalorderedP(X2)
& segmentP(X3,X2)
& neq(X1,nil)
& sK53 = X2
& X1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(X1) )
=> ( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ~ segmentP(sK54,sK53)
& ! [X4] :
( ~ totalorderedP(X4)
| ~ segmentP(X4,X2)
| ~ segmentP(X3,X4)
| ~ neq(X2,X4)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& totalorderedP(X2)
& segmentP(X3,X2)
& neq(sK54,nil)
& sK53 = X2
& sK54 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(sK54) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f345,plain,
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ~ segmentP(sK54,sK53)
& ! [X4] :
( ~ totalorderedP(X4)
| ~ segmentP(X4,X2)
| ~ segmentP(X3,X4)
| ~ neq(X2,X4)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& totalorderedP(X2)
& segmentP(X3,X2)
& neq(sK54,nil)
& sK53 = X2
& sK54 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
=> ( ? [X3] :
( ~ segmentP(sK54,sK53)
& ! [X4] :
( ~ totalorderedP(X4)
| ~ segmentP(X4,sK55)
| ~ segmentP(X3,X4)
| ~ neq(sK55,X4)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& totalorderedP(sK55)
& segmentP(X3,sK55)
& neq(sK54,nil)
& sK53 = sK55
& sK54 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(sK55) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f346,plain,
( ? [X3] :
( ~ segmentP(sK54,sK53)
& ! [X4] :
( ~ totalorderedP(X4)
| ~ segmentP(X4,sK55)
| ~ segmentP(X3,X4)
| ~ neq(sK55,X4)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& totalorderedP(sK55)
& segmentP(X3,sK55)
& neq(sK54,nil)
& sK53 = sK55
& sK54 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
=> ( ~ segmentP(sK54,sK53)
& ! [X4] :
( ~ totalorderedP(X4)
| ~ segmentP(X4,sK55)
| ~ segmentP(sK56,X4)
| ~ neq(sK55,X4)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& totalorderedP(sK55)
& segmentP(sK56,sK55)
& neq(sK54,nil)
& sK53 = sK55
& sK54 = sK56
& ssList(sK56) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f347,plain,
( ~ segmentP(sK54,sK53)
& ! [X4] :
( ~ totalorderedP(X4)
| ~ segmentP(X4,sK55)
| ~ segmentP(sK56,X4)
| ~ neq(sK55,X4)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& totalorderedP(sK55)
& segmentP(sK56,sK55)
& neq(sK54,nil)
& sK53 = sK55
& sK54 = sK56
& ssList(sK56)
& ssList(sK55)
& ssList(sK54)
& ssList(sK53) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK53,sK54,sK55,sK56])],[f222,f346,f345,f344,f343]) ).
fof(f551,plain,
sK54 = sK56,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f347]) ).
fof(f552,plain,
sK53 = sK55,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f347]) ).
fof(f554,plain,
segmentP(sK56,sK55),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f347]) ).
fof(f557,plain,
~ segmentP(sK54,sK53),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f347]) ).
fof(f558,plain,
~ segmentP(sK56,sK55),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f557,f551,f552]) ).
cnf(c_246,negated_conjecture,
~ segmentP(sK56,sK55),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f558]) ).
cnf(c_249,negated_conjecture,
segmentP(sK56,sK55),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f554]) ).
cnf(c_255,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_246,c_249]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : SWC360+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.10/0.13 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Thu May 2 23:29:19 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 1.28/1.22 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.28/1.22 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.28/1.22
% 1.28/1.22 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 1.28/1.22
% 1.28/1.22 ------ iProver source info
% 1.28/1.22
% 1.28/1.22 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 1.28/1.22 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 1.28/1.22 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.28/1.22
% 1.28/1.22 ------ Parsing...
% 1.28/1.22 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 1.28/1.22
% 1.28/1.22 ------ Preprocessing...
% 1.28/1.22
% 1.28/1.22 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.28/1.22
% 1.28/1.22 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.28/1.22
% 1.28/1.22
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------