TSTP Solution File: SWC360+1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SWC360+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:29:15 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 51 ( 8 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 15 ( 5 avg)
% Number of connectives : 61 ( 19 ~; 16 |; 18 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 21 ( 7 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 11 ( 0 sgn 9 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( X2 != X4
| X1 != X3
| ~ neq(X2,nil)
| ~ segmentP(X4,X3)
| ~ totalorderedP(X3)
| ? [X5] :
( ssList(X5)
& neq(X3,X5)
& segmentP(X4,X5)
& segmentP(X5,X3)
& totalorderedP(X5) )
| segmentP(X2,X1) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).
fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( X2 != X4
| X1 != X3
| ~ neq(X2,nil)
| ~ segmentP(X4,X3)
| ~ totalorderedP(X3)
| ? [X5] :
( ssList(X5)
& neq(X3,X5)
& segmentP(X4,X5)
& segmentP(X5,X3)
& totalorderedP(X5) )
| segmentP(X2,X1) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1])]) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X11] :
( ssList(esk1_0)
& ssList(esk2_0)
& ssList(esk3_0)
& ssList(esk4_0)
& esk2_0 = esk4_0
& esk1_0 = esk3_0
& neq(esk2_0,nil)
& segmentP(esk4_0,esk3_0)
& totalorderedP(esk3_0)
& ( ~ ssList(X11)
| ~ neq(esk3_0,X11)
| ~ segmentP(esk4_0,X11)
| ~ segmentP(X11,esk3_0)
| ~ totalorderedP(X11) )
& ~ segmentP(esk2_0,esk1_0) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ segmentP(esk2_0,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
esk2_0 = esk4_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
esk1_0 = esk3_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
segmentP(esk4_0,esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ segmentP(esk4_0,esk3_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWC360+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun May 19 03:39:07 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 Running first-order model finding
% 0.19/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.48 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # new_bool_3 with pid 13270 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.48 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 13273 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.48 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.48 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.48 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.48 # Parsed axioms : 96
% 0.19/0.48 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 47
% 0.19/0.48 # Initial clauses : 87
% 0.19/0.48 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.19/0.48 # Initial clauses in saturation : 86
% 0.19/0.48 # Processed clauses : 16
% 0.19/0.48 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.19/0.48 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # ...remaining for further processing : 13
% 0.19/0.48 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # NegExts : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Total rewrite steps : 7
% 0.19/0.48 # ...of those cached : 3
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of processed clauses : 13
% 0.19/0.48 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 10
% 0.19/0.48 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.19/0.48 # Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 70
% 0.19/0.48 # ...number of literals in the above : 278
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Termbank termtop insertions : 7314
% 0.19/0.48 # Search garbage collected termcells : 2168
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48 # User time : 0.009 s
% 0.19/0.48 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 2068 pages
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 # User time : 0.012 s
% 0.19/0.49 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Total time : 0.017 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1824 pages
% 0.19/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------