TSTP Solution File: SWC339-1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SWC339-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:38:17 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.60s 0.76s
% Output : Refutation 0.60s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 21 ( 13 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 42 ( 4 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 49 ( 28 ~; 21 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 7 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f245,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f244,f193]) ).
fof(f193,axiom,
ssList(sk6),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_8) ).
fof(f244,plain,
~ ssList(sk6),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f243,f192]) ).
fof(f192,axiom,
ssList(sk5),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).
fof(f243,plain,
( ~ ssList(sk5)
| ~ ssList(sk6) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f242,f200]) ).
fof(f200,plain,
ssList(sk3),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f186,f191]) ).
fof(f191,axiom,
sk1 = sk3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).
fof(f186,axiom,
ssList(sk1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_1) ).
fof(f242,plain,
( ~ ssList(sk3)
| ~ ssList(sk5)
| ~ ssList(sk6) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f241,f201]) ).
fof(f201,plain,
ssList(sk4),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f187,f190]) ).
fof(f190,axiom,
sk2 = sk4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).
fof(f187,axiom,
ssList(sk2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_2) ).
fof(f241,plain,
( ~ ssList(sk4)
| ~ ssList(sk3)
| ~ ssList(sk5)
| ~ ssList(sk6) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f223,f217]) ).
fof(f217,plain,
~ segmentP(sk4,sk3),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f202,f195]) ).
fof(f195,axiom,
totalorderedP(sk3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_10) ).
fof(f202,plain,
( ~ totalorderedP(sk3)
| ~ segmentP(sk4,sk3) ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f199,f191,f190,f191]) ).
fof(f199,axiom,
( ~ totalorderedP(sk1)
| ~ segmentP(sk2,sk1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_14) ).
fof(f223,plain,
( segmentP(sk4,sk3)
| ~ ssList(sk4)
| ~ ssList(sk3)
| ~ ssList(sk5)
| ~ ssList(sk6) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f205,f194]) ).
fof(f194,axiom,
sk4 = app(app(sk5,sk3),sk6),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_9) ).
fof(f205,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( segmentP(app(app(X0,X1),X2),X1)
| ~ ssList(app(app(X0,X1),X2))
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssList(X0)
| ~ ssList(X2) ),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f173]) ).
fof(f173,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( segmentP(X3,X1)
| ~ ssList(X3)
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssList(X0)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| app(app(X0,X1),X2) != X3 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause173) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWC339-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Sun May 19 03:04:08 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.36 This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN problem
% 0.15/0.36 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.60/0.75 % (21829)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.60/0.75 % (21827)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.60/0.75 % (21828)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.60/0.75 % (21825)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.60/0.75 % (21830)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.60/0.75 % (21831)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.60/0.75 % (21832)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.60/0.75 % (21830)First to succeed.
% 0.60/0.75 % (21830)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-21824"
% 0.60/0.76 % (21830)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.60/0.76 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.60/0.76 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.60/0.76 % (21830)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.76 % (21830)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.60/0.76 % (21830)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.60/0.76
% 0.60/0.76 % (21830)Memory used [KB]: 1193
% 0.60/0.76 % (21830)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.60/0.76 % (21830)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.60/0.76 % (21824)Success in time 0.393 s
% 0.60/0.76 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------