TSTP Solution File: SWC317+1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SWC317+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:38:05 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.55s 0.74s
% Output : Refutation 0.55s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 13
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 44 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 328 ( 112 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 34 ( 7 avg)
% Number of connectives : 416 ( 132 ~; 112 |; 142 &)
% ( 6 <=>; 24 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 19 ( 7 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 11 ( 9 usr; 7 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 102 ( 48 !; 54 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f631,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f600,f605,f610,f615,f619,f625,f630]) ).
fof(f630,plain,
( ~ spl53_4
| ~ spl53_5
| ~ spl53_1
| ~ spl53_3
| ~ spl53_6 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f629,f617,f602,f593,f612,f607]) ).
fof(f607,plain,
( spl53_4
<=> ssList(sK52) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl53_4])]) ).
fof(f612,plain,
( spl53_5
<=> ssItem(sK51) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl53_5])]) ).
fof(f593,plain,
( spl53_1
<=> sK50 = app(sK52,cons(sK51,nil)) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl53_1])]) ).
fof(f602,plain,
( spl53_3
<=> sK49 = app(cons(sK51,nil),sK52) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl53_3])]) ).
fof(f617,plain,
( spl53_6
<=> ! [X6,X7] :
( app(X7,cons(X6,nil)) != sK50
| ~ ssItem(X6)
| ~ ssList(X7)
| app(cons(X6,nil),X7) != sK49 ) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl53_6])]) ).
fof(f629,plain,
( ~ ssItem(sK51)
| ~ ssList(sK52)
| ~ spl53_1
| ~ spl53_3
| ~ spl53_6 ),
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f628]) ).
fof(f628,plain,
( sK50 != sK50
| ~ ssItem(sK51)
| ~ ssList(sK52)
| ~ spl53_1
| ~ spl53_3
| ~ spl53_6 ),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f627,f595]) ).
fof(f595,plain,
( sK50 = app(sK52,cons(sK51,nil))
| ~ spl53_1 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f593]) ).
fof(f627,plain,
( ~ ssItem(sK51)
| ~ ssList(sK52)
| sK50 != app(sK52,cons(sK51,nil))
| ~ spl53_3
| ~ spl53_6 ),
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f626]) ).
fof(f626,plain,
( sK49 != sK49
| ~ ssItem(sK51)
| ~ ssList(sK52)
| sK50 != app(sK52,cons(sK51,nil))
| ~ spl53_3
| ~ spl53_6 ),
inference(superposition,[],[f618,f604]) ).
fof(f604,plain,
( sK49 = app(cons(sK51,nil),sK52)
| ~ spl53_3 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f602]) ).
fof(f618,plain,
( ! [X6,X7] :
( app(cons(X6,nil),X7) != sK49
| ~ ssItem(X6)
| ~ ssList(X7)
| app(X7,cons(X6,nil)) != sK50 )
| ~ spl53_6 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f617]) ).
fof(f625,plain,
spl53_2,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f584,f597]) ).
fof(f597,plain,
( spl53_2
<=> neq(sK50,nil) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl53_2])]) ).
fof(f584,plain,
neq(sK50,nil),
inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f554]) ).
fof(f554,plain,
( neq(sK50,nil)
| neq(sK50,nil) ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f535,f533,f533]) ).
fof(f533,plain,
sK48 = sK50,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f338]) ).
fof(f338,plain,
( ( ( ~ neq(sK50,nil)
& neq(sK48,nil) )
| ( sK50 = app(sK52,cons(sK51,nil))
& sK49 = app(cons(sK51,nil),sK52)
& ssList(sK52)
& ssItem(sK51)
& ! [X6] :
( ! [X7] :
( app(X7,cons(X6,nil)) != sK48
| app(cons(X6,nil),X7) != sK47
| ~ ssList(X7) )
| ~ ssItem(X6) )
& neq(sK48,nil) ) )
& sK47 = sK49
& sK48 = sK50
& ssList(sK50)
& ssList(sK49)
& ssList(sK48)
& ssList(sK47) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK47,sK48,sK49,sK50,sK51,sK52])],[f223,f337,f336,f335,f334,f333,f332]) ).
fof(f332,plain,
( ? [X0] :
( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
& neq(X1,nil) )
| ( ? [X4] :
( ? [X5] :
( app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) = X3
& app(cons(X4,nil),X5) = X2
& ssList(X5) )
& ssItem(X4) )
& ! [X6] :
( ! [X7] :
( app(X7,cons(X6,nil)) != X1
| app(cons(X6,nil),X7) != X0
| ~ ssList(X7) )
| ~ ssItem(X6) )
& neq(X1,nil) ) )
& X0 = X2
& X1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(X1) )
& ssList(X0) )
=> ( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
& neq(X1,nil) )
| ( ? [X4] :
( ? [X5] :
( app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) = X3
& app(cons(X4,nil),X5) = X2
& ssList(X5) )
& ssItem(X4) )
& ! [X6] :
( ! [X7] :
( app(X7,cons(X6,nil)) != X1
| app(cons(X6,nil),X7) != sK47
| ~ ssList(X7) )
| ~ ssItem(X6) )
& neq(X1,nil) ) )
& sK47 = X2
& X1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(X1) )
& ssList(sK47) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f333,plain,
( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
& neq(X1,nil) )
| ( ? [X4] :
( ? [X5] :
( app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) = X3
& app(cons(X4,nil),X5) = X2
& ssList(X5) )
& ssItem(X4) )
& ! [X6] :
( ! [X7] :
( app(X7,cons(X6,nil)) != X1
| app(cons(X6,nil),X7) != sK47
| ~ ssList(X7) )
| ~ ssItem(X6) )
& neq(X1,nil) ) )
& sK47 = X2
& X1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(X1) )
=> ( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
& neq(sK48,nil) )
| ( ? [X4] :
( ? [X5] :
( app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) = X3
& app(cons(X4,nil),X5) = X2
& ssList(X5) )
& ssItem(X4) )
& ! [X6] :
( ! [X7] :
( app(X7,cons(X6,nil)) != sK48
| app(cons(X6,nil),X7) != sK47
| ~ ssList(X7) )
| ~ ssItem(X6) )
& neq(sK48,nil) ) )
& sK47 = X2
& sK48 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(sK48) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f334,plain,
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
& neq(sK48,nil) )
| ( ? [X4] :
( ? [X5] :
( app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) = X3
& app(cons(X4,nil),X5) = X2
& ssList(X5) )
& ssItem(X4) )
& ! [X6] :
( ! [X7] :
( app(X7,cons(X6,nil)) != sK48
| app(cons(X6,nil),X7) != sK47
| ~ ssList(X7) )
| ~ ssItem(X6) )
& neq(sK48,nil) ) )
& sK47 = X2
& sK48 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
=> ( ? [X3] :
( ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
& neq(sK48,nil) )
| ( ? [X4] :
( ? [X5] :
( app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) = X3
& app(cons(X4,nil),X5) = sK49
& ssList(X5) )
& ssItem(X4) )
& ! [X6] :
( ! [X7] :
( app(X7,cons(X6,nil)) != sK48
| app(cons(X6,nil),X7) != sK47
| ~ ssList(X7) )
| ~ ssItem(X6) )
& neq(sK48,nil) ) )
& sK47 = sK49
& sK48 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(sK49) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f335,plain,
( ? [X3] :
( ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
& neq(sK48,nil) )
| ( ? [X4] :
( ? [X5] :
( app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) = X3
& app(cons(X4,nil),X5) = sK49
& ssList(X5) )
& ssItem(X4) )
& ! [X6] :
( ! [X7] :
( app(X7,cons(X6,nil)) != sK48
| app(cons(X6,nil),X7) != sK47
| ~ ssList(X7) )
| ~ ssItem(X6) )
& neq(sK48,nil) ) )
& sK47 = sK49
& sK48 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
=> ( ( ( ~ neq(sK50,nil)
& neq(sK48,nil) )
| ( ? [X4] :
( ? [X5] :
( app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) = sK50
& app(cons(X4,nil),X5) = sK49
& ssList(X5) )
& ssItem(X4) )
& ! [X6] :
( ! [X7] :
( app(X7,cons(X6,nil)) != sK48
| app(cons(X6,nil),X7) != sK47
| ~ ssList(X7) )
| ~ ssItem(X6) )
& neq(sK48,nil) ) )
& sK47 = sK49
& sK48 = sK50
& ssList(sK50) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f336,plain,
( ? [X4] :
( ? [X5] :
( app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) = sK50
& app(cons(X4,nil),X5) = sK49
& ssList(X5) )
& ssItem(X4) )
=> ( ? [X5] :
( sK50 = app(X5,cons(sK51,nil))
& sK49 = app(cons(sK51,nil),X5)
& ssList(X5) )
& ssItem(sK51) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f337,plain,
( ? [X5] :
( sK50 = app(X5,cons(sK51,nil))
& sK49 = app(cons(sK51,nil),X5)
& ssList(X5) )
=> ( sK50 = app(sK52,cons(sK51,nil))
& sK49 = app(cons(sK51,nil),sK52)
& ssList(sK52) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f223,plain,
? [X0] :
( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
& neq(X1,nil) )
| ( ? [X4] :
( ? [X5] :
( app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) = X3
& app(cons(X4,nil),X5) = X2
& ssList(X5) )
& ssItem(X4) )
& ! [X6] :
( ! [X7] :
( app(X7,cons(X6,nil)) != X1
| app(cons(X6,nil),X7) != X0
| ~ ssList(X7) )
| ~ ssItem(X6) )
& neq(X1,nil) ) )
& X0 = X2
& X1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(X1) )
& ssList(X0) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f222]) ).
fof(f222,plain,
? [X0] :
( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
& neq(X1,nil) )
| ( ? [X4] :
( ? [X5] :
( app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) = X3
& app(cons(X4,nil),X5) = X2
& ssList(X5) )
& ssItem(X4) )
& ! [X6] :
( ! [X7] :
( app(X7,cons(X6,nil)) != X1
| app(cons(X6,nil),X7) != X0
| ~ ssList(X7) )
| ~ ssItem(X6) )
& neq(X1,nil) ) )
& X0 = X2
& X1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(X1) )
& ssList(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f98]) ).
fof(f98,plain,
~ ! [X0] :
( ssList(X0)
=> ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ( ( ( neq(X3,nil)
| ~ neq(X1,nil) )
& ( ! [X4] :
( ssItem(X4)
=> ! [X5] :
( ssList(X5)
=> ( app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) != X3
| app(cons(X4,nil),X5) != X2 ) ) )
| ? [X6] :
( ? [X7] :
( app(X7,cons(X6,nil)) = X1
& app(cons(X6,nil),X7) = X0
& ssList(X7) )
& ssItem(X6) )
| ~ neq(X1,nil) ) )
| X0 != X2
| X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f97]) ).
fof(f97,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0] :
( ssList(X0)
=> ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ( ( ( neq(X3,nil)
| ~ neq(X1,nil) )
& ( ! [X6] :
( ssItem(X6)
=> ! [X7] :
( ssList(X7)
=> ( app(X7,cons(X6,nil)) != X3
| app(cons(X6,nil),X7) != X2 ) ) )
| ? [X4] :
( ? [X5] :
( app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) = X1
& app(cons(X4,nil),X5) = X0
& ssList(X5) )
& ssItem(X4) )
| ~ neq(X1,nil) ) )
| X0 != X2
| X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f96]) ).
fof(f96,conjecture,
! [X0] :
( ssList(X0)
=> ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ( ( ( neq(X3,nil)
| ~ neq(X1,nil) )
& ( ! [X6] :
( ssItem(X6)
=> ! [X7] :
( ssList(X7)
=> ( app(X7,cons(X6,nil)) != X3
| app(cons(X6,nil),X7) != X2 ) ) )
| ? [X4] :
( ? [X5] :
( app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) = X1
& app(cons(X4,nil),X5) = X0
& ssList(X5) )
& ssItem(X4) )
| ~ neq(X1,nil) ) )
| X0 != X2
| X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).
fof(f535,plain,
( neq(sK48,nil)
| neq(sK48,nil) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f338]) ).
fof(f619,plain,
( spl53_6
| ~ spl53_2 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f547,f597,f617]) ).
fof(f547,plain,
! [X6,X7] :
( ~ neq(sK50,nil)
| app(X7,cons(X6,nil)) != sK50
| app(cons(X6,nil),X7) != sK49
| ~ ssList(X7)
| ~ ssItem(X6) ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f542,f533,f534]) ).
fof(f534,plain,
sK47 = sK49,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f338]) ).
fof(f542,plain,
! [X6,X7] :
( ~ neq(sK50,nil)
| app(X7,cons(X6,nil)) != sK48
| app(cons(X6,nil),X7) != sK47
| ~ ssList(X7)
| ~ ssItem(X6) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f338]) ).
fof(f615,plain,
( spl53_5
| ~ spl53_2 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f543,f597,f612]) ).
fof(f543,plain,
( ~ neq(sK50,nil)
| ssItem(sK51) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f338]) ).
fof(f610,plain,
( spl53_4
| ~ spl53_2 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f544,f597,f607]) ).
fof(f544,plain,
( ~ neq(sK50,nil)
| ssList(sK52) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f338]) ).
fof(f605,plain,
( spl53_3
| ~ spl53_2 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f545,f597,f602]) ).
fof(f545,plain,
( ~ neq(sK50,nil)
| sK49 = app(cons(sK51,nil),sK52) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f338]) ).
fof(f600,plain,
( spl53_1
| ~ spl53_2 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f546,f597,f593]) ).
fof(f546,plain,
( ~ neq(sK50,nil)
| sK50 = app(sK52,cons(sK51,nil)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f338]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWC317+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.34 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.34 % DateTime : Sun May 19 02:47:23 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.35 This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.15/0.35 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/0.73 % (32286)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.55/0.73 % (32281)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.55/0.73 % (32283)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.55/0.73 % (32282)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.55/0.73 % (32286)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (32286)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.73 % (32286)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.55/0.73 % (32286)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.55/0.73
% 0.55/0.73 % (32286)Memory used [KB]: 1151
% 0.55/0.73 % (32286)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.55/0.73 % (32286)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.55/0.73 % (32288)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.55/0.73 % (32286)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.73 % (32286)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.73 % (32287)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.55/0.73 % (32288)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (32288)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.73 % (32288)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.55/0.73 % (32288)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.55/0.73
% 0.55/0.73 % (32288)Memory used [KB]: 1154
% 0.55/0.73 % (32288)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.55/0.73 % (32288)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.55/0.73 % (32288)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.73 % (32288)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.73 % (32284)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.55/0.73 % (32289)lrs+21_1:16_sil=2000:sp=occurrence:urr=on:flr=on:i=55:sd=1:nm=0:ins=3:ss=included:rawr=on:br=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/55Mi)
% 0.55/0.74 % (32282)First to succeed.
% 0.55/0.74 % (32291)dis+3_25:4_sil=16000:sos=all:erd=off:i=50:s2at=4.0:bd=off:nm=60:sup=off:cond=on:av=off:ins=2:nwc=10.0:etr=on:to=lpo:s2agt=20:fd=off:bsr=unit_only:slsq=on:slsqr=28,19:awrs=converge:awrsf=500:tgt=ground:bs=unit_only_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/50Mi)
% 0.55/0.74 % (32281)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (32281)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.74 % (32281)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.55/0.74 % (32281)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.55/0.74
% 0.55/0.74 % (32281)Memory used [KB]: 1202
% 0.55/0.74 % (32281)Time elapsed: 0.010 s
% 0.55/0.74 % (32281)Instructions burned: 16 (million)
% 0.55/0.74 % (32281)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.74 % (32281)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.74 % (32282)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-32280"
% 0.55/0.74 % (32282)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.55/0.74 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.55/0.74 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.55/0.74 % (32282)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.74 % (32282)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.55/0.74 % (32282)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.55/0.74
% 0.55/0.74 % (32282)Memory used [KB]: 1455
% 0.55/0.74 % (32282)Time elapsed: 0.013 s
% 0.55/0.74 % (32282)Instructions burned: 18 (million)
% 0.55/0.74 % (32280)Success in time 0.387 s
% 0.55/0.74 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------