TSTP Solution File: SWC294-1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SWC294-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:37:52 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.55s 0.76s
% Output : Refutation 0.55s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 18
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 44 ( 15 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 94 ( 12 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 92 ( 42 ~; 46 |; 0 &)
% ( 4 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 12 ( 10 usr; 5 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f327,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f220,f234,f235,f297,f322]) ).
fof(f322,plain,
( ~ spl0_1
| ~ spl0_5 ),
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f321]) ).
fof(f321,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_1
| ~ spl0_5 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f320,f47]) ).
fof(f47,axiom,
! [X0] : ssItem(skaf44(X0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause47) ).
fof(f320,plain,
( ~ ssItem(skaf44(sk3))
| ~ spl0_1
| ~ spl0_5 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f315,f197]) ).
fof(f197,plain,
~ strictorderedP(sk3),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f193,f191]) ).
fof(f191,axiom,
sk1 = sk3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).
fof(f193,axiom,
~ strictorderedP(sk1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_8) ).
fof(f315,plain,
( strictorderedP(sk3)
| ~ ssItem(skaf44(sk3))
| ~ spl0_1
| ~ spl0_5 ),
inference(superposition,[],[f232,f303]) ).
fof(f303,plain,
( sk3 = cons(skaf44(sk3),nil)
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f302,f195]) ).
fof(f195,plain,
ssList(sk3),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f186,f191]) ).
fof(f186,axiom,
ssList(sk1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_1) ).
fof(f302,plain,
( ~ ssList(sk3)
| sk3 = cons(skaf44(sk3),nil)
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f101,f215]) ).
fof(f215,plain,
( singletonP(sk3)
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f213]) ).
fof(f213,plain,
( spl0_1
<=> singletonP(sk3) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])]) ).
fof(f101,axiom,
! [X0] :
( ~ singletonP(X0)
| ~ ssList(X0)
| cons(skaf44(X0),nil) = X0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause101) ).
fof(f232,plain,
( ! [X1] :
( strictorderedP(cons(X1,nil))
| ~ ssItem(X1) )
| ~ spl0_5 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f231]) ).
fof(f231,plain,
( spl0_5
<=> ! [X1] :
( strictorderedP(cons(X1,nil))
| ~ ssItem(X1) ) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_5])]) ).
fof(f297,plain,
( spl0_2
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f296]) ).
fof(f296,plain,
( $false
| spl0_2
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f288,f3]) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
strictorderedP(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause3) ).
fof(f288,plain,
( ~ strictorderedP(nil)
| spl0_2
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f197,f286]) ).
fof(f286,plain,
( nil = sk3
| spl0_2
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f285,f195]) ).
fof(f285,plain,
( ~ ssList(sk3)
| nil = sk3
| spl0_2
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f276,f80]) ).
fof(f80,axiom,
! [X0] :
( ~ segmentP(nil,X0)
| ~ ssList(X0)
| nil = X0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause80) ).
fof(f276,plain,
( segmentP(nil,sk3)
| spl0_2
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f192,f275]) ).
fof(f275,plain,
( nil = sk4
| spl0_2
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f274,f223]) ).
fof(f223,plain,
( ssList(nil)
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f222]) ).
fof(f222,plain,
( spl0_3
<=> ssList(nil) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_3])]) ).
fof(f274,plain,
( nil = sk4
| ~ ssList(nil)
| spl0_2 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f269,f196]) ).
fof(f196,plain,
ssList(sk4),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f187,f190]) ).
fof(f190,axiom,
sk2 = sk4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).
fof(f187,axiom,
ssList(sk2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_2) ).
fof(f269,plain,
( nil = sk4
| ~ ssList(sk4)
| ~ ssList(nil)
| spl0_2 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f100,f219]) ).
fof(f219,plain,
( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
| spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f217]) ).
fof(f217,plain,
( spl0_2
<=> neq(sk4,nil) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])]) ).
fof(f100,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( neq(X1,X0)
| X0 = X1
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssList(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause100) ).
fof(f192,axiom,
segmentP(sk4,sk3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).
fof(f235,plain,
spl0_3,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f8,f222]) ).
fof(f8,axiom,
ssList(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause8) ).
fof(f234,plain,
spl0_5,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f66,f231]) ).
fof(f66,axiom,
! [X0] :
( strictorderedP(cons(X0,nil))
| ~ ssItem(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause66) ).
fof(f220,plain,
( spl0_1
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f194,f217,f213]) ).
fof(f194,axiom,
( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
| singletonP(sk3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_9) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SWC294-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.06/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sun May 19 03:29:23 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.35 This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN problem
% 0.14/0.35 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/0.75 % (12471)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.55/0.75 % (12464)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.55/0.76 % (12466)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.55/0.76 % (12465)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.55/0.76 % (12467)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.55/0.76 % (12468)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.55/0.76 % (12469)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.55/0.76 % (12471)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (12471)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.76 % (12471)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.55/0.76 % (12471)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.55/0.76
% 0.55/0.76 % (12471)Memory used [KB]: 1168
% 0.55/0.76 % (12470)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.55/0.76 % (12471)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.55/0.76 % (12471)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.55/0.76 % (12471)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.76 % (12471)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.76 % (12472)lrs+21_1:16_sil=2000:sp=occurrence:urr=on:flr=on:i=55:sd=1:nm=0:ins=3:ss=included:rawr=on:br=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/55Mi)
% 0.55/0.76 % (12469)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (12469)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.76 % (12469)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.55/0.76 % (12469)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.55/0.76
% 0.55/0.76 % (12469)Memory used [KB]: 1194
% 0.55/0.76 % (12469)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.55/0.76 % (12469)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.55/0.76 % (12469)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.76 % (12469)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.76 % (12464)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (12464)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.76 % (12464)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.55/0.76 % (12464)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.55/0.76
% 0.55/0.76 % (12464)Memory used [KB]: 1216
% 0.55/0.76 % (12464)Time elapsed: 0.008 s
% 0.55/0.76 % (12464)Instructions burned: 10 (million)
% 0.55/0.76 % (12467)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (12467)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.76 % (12467)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.55/0.76 % (12467)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.55/0.76
% 0.55/0.76 % (12467)Memory used [KB]: 1262
% 0.55/0.76 % (12467)Time elapsed: 0.008 s
% 0.55/0.76 % (12467)Instructions burned: 11 (million)
% 0.55/0.76 % (12464)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.76 % (12464)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.76 % (12466)First to succeed.
% 0.55/0.76 % (12467)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.76 % (12467)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.76 % (12472)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (12472)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.76 % (12472)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.55/0.76 % (12472)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.55/0.76
% 0.55/0.76 % (12472)Memory used [KB]: 1261
% 0.55/0.76 % (12472)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.55/0.76 % (12472)Instructions burned: 12 (million)
% 0.55/0.76 % (12472)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.76 % (12472)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.76 % (12465)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.55/0.76 % (12466)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-12463"
% 0.55/0.76 % (12473)dis+3_25:4_sil=16000:sos=all:erd=off:i=50:s2at=4.0:bd=off:nm=60:sup=off:cond=on:av=off:ins=2:nwc=10.0:etr=on:to=lpo:s2agt=20:fd=off:bsr=unit_only:slsq=on:slsqr=28,19:awrs=converge:awrsf=500:tgt=ground:bs=unit_only_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/50Mi)
% 0.55/0.76 % (12466)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.55/0.76 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.55/0.76 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.55/0.76 % (12466)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.76 % (12466)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.55/0.76 % (12466)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.55/0.76
% 0.55/0.76 % (12466)Memory used [KB]: 1221
% 0.55/0.76 % (12466)Time elapsed: 0.009 s
% 0.55/0.76 % (12466)Instructions burned: 11 (million)
% 0.55/0.76 % (12463)Success in time 0.401 s
% 0.67/0.76 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------