TSTP Solution File: SWC277+1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SWC277+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:37:41 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.73s 0.91s
% Output   : Refutation 0.73s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   69 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  307 (  68 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   20 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  353 ( 115   ~; 106   |; 102   &)
%                                         (  11 <=>;  19  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   15 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   12 (  10 usr;   4 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   72 (  43   !;  29   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f424,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f356,f387,f409,f423]) ).

fof(f423,plain,
    ( ~ spl23_1
    | spl23_3 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f422]) ).

fof(f422,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl23_1
    | spl23_3 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f421,f225]) ).

fof(f225,plain,
    ssList(sK2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f176]) ).

fof(f176,plain,
    ( ( ~ neq(sK3,nil)
      | singletonP(sK2) )
    & ~ totalorderedP(sK0)
    & segmentP(sK3,sK2)
    & sK0 = sK2
    & sK1 = sK3
    & ssList(sK3)
    & ssList(sK2)
    & ssList(sK1)
    & ssList(sK0) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f99,f175,f174,f173,f172]) ).

fof(f172,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( ? [X1] :
            ( ? [X2] :
                ( ? [X3] :
                    ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                      | singletonP(X2) )
                    & ~ totalorderedP(X0)
                    & segmentP(X3,X2)
                    & X0 = X2
                    & X1 = X3
                    & ssList(X3) )
                & ssList(X2) )
            & ssList(X1) )
        & ssList(X0) )
   => ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                    | singletonP(X2) )
                  & ~ totalorderedP(sK0)
                  & segmentP(X3,X2)
                  & sK0 = X2
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(sK0) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f173,plain,
    ( ? [X1] :
        ( ? [X2] :
            ( ? [X3] :
                ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                  | singletonP(X2) )
                & ~ totalorderedP(sK0)
                & segmentP(X3,X2)
                & sK0 = X2
                & X1 = X3
                & ssList(X3) )
            & ssList(X2) )
        & ssList(X1) )
   => ( ? [X2] :
          ( ? [X3] :
              ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                | singletonP(X2) )
              & ~ totalorderedP(sK0)
              & segmentP(X3,X2)
              & sK0 = X2
              & sK1 = X3
              & ssList(X3) )
          & ssList(X2) )
      & ssList(sK1) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f174,plain,
    ( ? [X2] :
        ( ? [X3] :
            ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
              | singletonP(X2) )
            & ~ totalorderedP(sK0)
            & segmentP(X3,X2)
            & sK0 = X2
            & sK1 = X3
            & ssList(X3) )
        & ssList(X2) )
   => ( ? [X3] :
          ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
            | singletonP(sK2) )
          & ~ totalorderedP(sK0)
          & segmentP(X3,sK2)
          & sK0 = sK2
          & sK1 = X3
          & ssList(X3) )
      & ssList(sK2) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f175,plain,
    ( ? [X3] :
        ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
          | singletonP(sK2) )
        & ~ totalorderedP(sK0)
        & segmentP(X3,sK2)
        & sK0 = sK2
        & sK1 = X3
        & ssList(X3) )
   => ( ( ~ neq(sK3,nil)
        | singletonP(sK2) )
      & ~ totalorderedP(sK0)
      & segmentP(sK3,sK2)
      & sK0 = sK2
      & sK1 = sK3
      & ssList(sK3) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f99,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                    | singletonP(X2) )
                  & ~ totalorderedP(X0)
                  & segmentP(X3,X2)
                  & X0 = X2
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f98]) ).

fof(f98,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                    | singletonP(X2) )
                  & ~ totalorderedP(X0)
                  & segmentP(X3,X2)
                  & X0 = X2
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).

fof(f97,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( ssList(X0)
       => ! [X1] :
            ( ssList(X1)
           => ! [X2] :
                ( ssList(X2)
               => ! [X3] :
                    ( ssList(X3)
                   => ( ( neq(X3,nil)
                        & ~ singletonP(X2) )
                      | totalorderedP(X0)
                      | ~ segmentP(X3,X2)
                      | X0 != X2
                      | X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f96]) ).

fof(f96,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
         => ! [X2] :
              ( ssList(X2)
             => ! [X3] :
                  ( ssList(X3)
                 => ( ( neq(X3,nil)
                      & ~ singletonP(X2) )
                    | totalorderedP(X0)
                    | ~ segmentP(X3,X2)
                    | X0 != X2
                    | X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(f421,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(sK2)
    | ~ spl23_1
    | spl23_3 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f420,f351]) ).

fof(f351,plain,
    ( singletonP(sK2)
    | ~ spl23_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f349]) ).

fof(f349,plain,
    ( spl23_1
  <=> singletonP(sK2) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl23_1])]) ).

fof(f420,plain,
    ( ~ singletonP(sK2)
    | ~ ssList(sK2)
    | spl23_3 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f402,f238]) ).

fof(f238,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssItem(sK4(X0))
      | ~ singletonP(X0)
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f182]) ).

fof(f182,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( ( singletonP(X0)
          | ! [X1] :
              ( cons(X1,nil) != X0
              | ~ ssItem(X1) ) )
        & ( ( cons(sK4(X0),nil) = X0
            & ssItem(sK4(X0)) )
          | ~ singletonP(X0) ) )
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK4])],[f180,f181]) ).

fof(f181,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ? [X2] :
          ( cons(X2,nil) = X0
          & ssItem(X2) )
     => ( cons(sK4(X0),nil) = X0
        & ssItem(sK4(X0)) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f180,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( ( singletonP(X0)
          | ! [X1] :
              ( cons(X1,nil) != X0
              | ~ ssItem(X1) ) )
        & ( ? [X2] :
              ( cons(X2,nil) = X0
              & ssItem(X2) )
          | ~ singletonP(X0) ) )
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f179]) ).

fof(f179,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( ( singletonP(X0)
          | ! [X1] :
              ( cons(X1,nil) != X0
              | ~ ssItem(X1) ) )
        & ( ? [X1] :
              ( cons(X1,nil) = X0
              & ssItem(X1) )
          | ~ singletonP(X0) ) )
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f102]) ).

fof(f102,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( singletonP(X0)
      <=> ? [X1] :
            ( cons(X1,nil) = X0
            & ssItem(X1) ) )
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ( singletonP(X0)
      <=> ? [X1] :
            ( cons(X1,nil) = X0
            & ssItem(X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax4) ).

fof(f402,plain,
    ( ~ ssItem(sK4(sK2))
    | spl23_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f400]) ).

fof(f400,plain,
    ( spl23_3
  <=> ssItem(sK4(sK2)) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl23_3])]) ).

fof(f409,plain,
    ( ~ spl23_3
    | ~ spl23_1 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f408,f349,f400]) ).

fof(f408,plain,
    ( ~ ssItem(sK4(sK2))
    | ~ spl23_1 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f395,f327]) ).

fof(f327,plain,
    ~ totalorderedP(sK2),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f230,f228]) ).

fof(f228,plain,
    sK0 = sK2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f176]) ).

fof(f230,plain,
    ~ totalorderedP(sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f176]) ).

fof(f395,plain,
    ( totalorderedP(sK2)
    | ~ ssItem(sK4(sK2))
    | ~ spl23_1 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f358,f393]) ).

fof(f393,plain,
    ( sK2 = cons(sK4(sK2),nil)
    | ~ spl23_1 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f392,f225]) ).

fof(f392,plain,
    ( sK2 = cons(sK4(sK2),nil)
    | ~ ssList(sK2)
    | ~ spl23_1 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f239,f351]) ).

fof(f239,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ singletonP(X0)
      | cons(sK4(X0),nil) = X0
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f182]) ).

fof(f358,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( totalorderedP(cons(X0,nil))
      | ~ ssItem(X0) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f335,f236]) ).

fof(f236,plain,
    ssList(nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f17,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax17) ).

fof(f335,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( totalorderedP(cons(X0,nil))
      | ~ ssList(nil)
      | ~ ssItem(X0) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f255]) ).

fof(f255,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( totalorderedP(cons(X0,X1))
      | nil != X1
      | ~ ssList(X1)
      | ~ ssItem(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f190]) ).

fof(f190,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ! [X1] :
          ( ( ( totalorderedP(cons(X0,X1))
              | ( ( ~ leq(X0,hd(X1))
                  | ~ totalorderedP(X1)
                  | nil = X1 )
                & nil != X1 ) )
            & ( ( leq(X0,hd(X1))
                & totalorderedP(X1)
                & nil != X1 )
              | nil = X1
              | ~ totalorderedP(cons(X0,X1)) ) )
          | ~ ssList(X1) )
      | ~ ssItem(X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f189]) ).

fof(f189,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ! [X1] :
          ( ( ( totalorderedP(cons(X0,X1))
              | ( ( ~ leq(X0,hd(X1))
                  | ~ totalorderedP(X1)
                  | nil = X1 )
                & nil != X1 ) )
            & ( ( leq(X0,hd(X1))
                & totalorderedP(X1)
                & nil != X1 )
              | nil = X1
              | ~ totalorderedP(cons(X0,X1)) ) )
          | ~ ssList(X1) )
      | ~ ssItem(X0) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f113]) ).

fof(f113,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ! [X1] :
          ( ( totalorderedP(cons(X0,X1))
          <=> ( ( leq(X0,hd(X1))
                & totalorderedP(X1)
                & nil != X1 )
              | nil = X1 ) )
          | ~ ssList(X1) )
      | ~ ssItem(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f67]) ).

fof(f67,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssItem(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
         => ( totalorderedP(cons(X0,X1))
          <=> ( ( leq(X0,hd(X1))
                & totalorderedP(X1)
                & nil != X1 )
              | nil = X1 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax67) ).

fof(f387,plain,
    spl23_2,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f386]) ).

fof(f386,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl23_2 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f385,f257]) ).

fof(f257,plain,
    totalorderedP(nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f66]) ).

fof(f66,axiom,
    totalorderedP(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax66) ).

fof(f385,plain,
    ( ~ totalorderedP(nil)
    | spl23_2 ),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f327,f382]) ).

fof(f382,plain,
    ( nil = sK2
    | spl23_2 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f381,f225]) ).

fof(f381,plain,
    ( nil = sK2
    | ~ ssList(sK2)
    | spl23_2 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f378,f241]) ).

fof(f241,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ segmentP(nil,X0)
      | nil = X0
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f183]) ).

fof(f183,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( ( segmentP(nil,X0)
          | nil != X0 )
        & ( nil = X0
          | ~ segmentP(nil,X0) ) )
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f103]) ).

fof(f103,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( segmentP(nil,X0)
      <=> nil = X0 )
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f58]) ).

fof(f58,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ( segmentP(nil,X0)
      <=> nil = X0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax58) ).

fof(f378,plain,
    ( segmentP(nil,sK2)
    | spl23_2 ),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f229,f375]) ).

fof(f375,plain,
    ( nil = sK3
    | spl23_2 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f374,f226]) ).

fof(f226,plain,
    ssList(sK3),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f176]) ).

fof(f374,plain,
    ( nil = sK3
    | ~ ssList(sK3)
    | spl23_2 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f369,f236]) ).

fof(f369,plain,
    ( nil = sK3
    | ~ ssList(nil)
    | ~ ssList(sK3)
    | spl23_2 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f233,f355]) ).

fof(f355,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sK3,nil)
    | spl23_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f353]) ).

fof(f353,plain,
    ( spl23_2
  <=> neq(sK3,nil) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl23_2])]) ).

fof(f233,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( neq(X0,X1)
      | X0 = X1
      | ~ ssList(X1)
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f177]) ).

fof(f177,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ! [X1] :
          ( ( ( neq(X0,X1)
              | X0 = X1 )
            & ( X0 != X1
              | ~ neq(X0,X1) ) )
          | ~ ssList(X1) )
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f100]) ).

fof(f100,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ! [X1] :
          ( ( neq(X0,X1)
          <=> X0 != X1 )
          | ~ ssList(X1) )
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
         => ( neq(X0,X1)
          <=> X0 != X1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax15) ).

fof(f229,plain,
    segmentP(sK3,sK2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f176]) ).

fof(f356,plain,
    ( spl23_1
    | ~ spl23_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f231,f353,f349]) ).

fof(f231,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sK3,nil)
    | singletonP(sK2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f176]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SWC277+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 03:34:53 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.36  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.14/0.36  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.70/0.90  % (24456)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/34Mi)
% 0.70/0.90  % (24458)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/78Mi)
% 0.70/0.90  % (24459)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/33Mi)
% 0.70/0.90  % (24457)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/51Mi)
% 0.70/0.90  % (24460)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/34Mi)
% 0.70/0.90  % (24461)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/45Mi)
% 0.70/0.90  % (24462)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/83Mi)
% 0.70/0.90  % (24463)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/56Mi)
% 0.73/0.90  % (24463)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (24463)------------------------------
% 0.73/0.90  % (24463)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.73/0.90  % (24463)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.73/0.90  
% 0.73/0.90  % (24463)Memory used [KB]: 1155
% 0.73/0.90  % (24463)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.73/0.90  % (24463)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.73/0.90  % (24463)------------------------------
% 0.73/0.90  % (24463)------------------------------
% 0.73/0.91  % (24458)First to succeed.
% 0.73/0.91  % (24464)lrs+21_1:16_sil=2000:sp=occurrence:urr=on:flr=on:i=55:sd=1:nm=0:ins=3:ss=included:rawr=on:br=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/55Mi)
% 0.73/0.91  % (24458)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-24455"
% 0.73/0.91  % (24458)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.73/0.91  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.73/0.91  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.73/0.91  % (24458)------------------------------
% 0.73/0.91  % (24458)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.73/0.91  % (24458)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.73/0.91  
% 0.73/0.91  % (24458)Memory used [KB]: 1327
% 0.73/0.91  % (24458)Time elapsed: 0.009 s
% 0.73/0.91  % (24458)Instructions burned: 14 (million)
% 0.73/0.91  % (24455)Success in time 0.533 s
% 0.73/0.91  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------