TSTP Solution File: SWC258-1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SWC258-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:37:31 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.61s 0.81s
% Output : Refutation 0.61s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 26 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 51 ( 9 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 51 ( 26 ~; 22 |; 0 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 6 usr; 4 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 3 ( 3 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f263,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f225,f240,f247,f262]) ).
fof(f262,plain,
( ~ spl0_1
| ~ spl0_4 ),
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f261]) ).
fof(f261,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_1
| ~ spl0_4 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f260,f8]) ).
fof(f8,axiom,
ssList(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause8) ).
fof(f260,plain,
( ~ ssList(nil)
| ~ spl0_1
| ~ spl0_4 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f257,f215]) ).
fof(f215,plain,
( ssItem(sk5)
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f213]) ).
fof(f213,plain,
( spl0_1
<=> ssItem(sk5) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])]) ).
fof(f257,plain,
( ~ ssItem(sk5)
| ~ ssList(nil)
| ~ spl0_4 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f254,f205]) ).
fof(f205,plain,
! [X1] :
( totalorderedP(cons(X1,nil))
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssList(nil) ),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f113]) ).
fof(f113,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( totalorderedP(cons(X1,X0))
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssList(X0)
| nil != X0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause113) ).
fof(f254,plain,
( ~ totalorderedP(cons(sk5,nil))
| ~ spl0_4 ),
inference(superposition,[],[f203,f229]) ).
fof(f229,plain,
( sk3 = cons(sk5,nil)
| ~ spl0_4 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f227]) ).
fof(f227,plain,
( spl0_4
<=> sk3 = cons(sk5,nil) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_4])]) ).
fof(f203,plain,
~ totalorderedP(sk3),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f192,f191]) ).
fof(f191,axiom,
sk1 = sk3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).
fof(f192,axiom,
~ totalorderedP(sk1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).
fof(f247,plain,
~ spl0_3,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f246]) ).
fof(f246,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f244,f4]) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
totalorderedP(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause4) ).
fof(f244,plain,
( ~ totalorderedP(nil)
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(superposition,[],[f203,f224]) ).
fof(f224,plain,
( nil = sk3
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f222]) ).
fof(f222,plain,
( spl0_3
<=> nil = sk3 ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_3])]) ).
fof(f240,plain,
( spl0_4
| spl0_3 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f198,f222,f227]) ).
fof(f198,axiom,
( nil = sk3
| sk3 = cons(sk5,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_13) ).
fof(f225,plain,
( spl0_1
| spl0_3 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f194,f222,f213]) ).
fof(f194,axiom,
( nil = sk3
| ssItem(sk5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_9) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.10 % Problem : SWC258-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.05/0.11 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.11/0.31 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31 % DateTime : Sun May 19 03:54:52 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.31 This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN problem
% 0.11/0.32 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.61/0.80 % (15835)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.61/0.80 % (15834)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.61/0.80 % (15831)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.61/0.80 % (15833)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.61/0.80 % (15836)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.61/0.80 % (15832)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.61/0.80 % (15837)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.61/0.80 % (15838)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.61/0.80 % (15838)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (15838)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.80 % (15838)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.61/0.80 % (15838)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.61/0.80
% 0.61/0.80 % (15838)Memory used [KB]: 1193
% 0.61/0.80 % (15836)First to succeed.
% 0.61/0.80 % (15838)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.61/0.80 % (15838)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.61/0.80 % (15834)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.61/0.80 % (15838)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.80 % (15838)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.80 % (15836)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-15830"
% 0.61/0.81 % (15833)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.61/0.81 % (15836)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.61/0.81 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.61/0.81 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.61/0.81 % (15836)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.81 % (15836)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.61/0.81 % (15836)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.61/0.81
% 0.61/0.81 % (15836)Memory used [KB]: 1212
% 0.61/0.81 % (15836)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.61/0.81 % (15836)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.61/0.81 % (15830)Success in time 0.485 s
% 0.61/0.81 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------