TSTP Solution File: SWC256-1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SWC256-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:37:30 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.48s 0.69s
% Output : Refutation 0.48s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 13
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 34 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 66 ( 11 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 66 ( 34 ~; 29 |; 0 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 9 ( 7 usr; 4 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 7 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f299,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f223,f233,f248,f298]) ).
fof(f298,plain,
( ~ spl0_1
| ~ spl0_4 ),
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f297]) ).
fof(f297,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_1
| ~ spl0_4 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f296,f218]) ).
fof(f218,plain,
( ssItem(sk5)
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f216]) ).
fof(f216,plain,
( spl0_1
<=> ssItem(sk5) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])]) ).
fof(f296,plain,
( ~ ssItem(sk5)
| ~ spl0_4 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f295,f203]) ).
fof(f203,plain,
~ singletonP(sk3),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f193,f191]) ).
fof(f191,axiom,
sk1 = sk3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).
fof(f193,axiom,
~ singletonP(sk1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_8) ).
fof(f295,plain,
( singletonP(sk3)
| ~ ssItem(sk5)
| ~ spl0_4 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f294,f200]) ).
fof(f200,plain,
ssList(sk3),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f186,f191]) ).
fof(f186,axiom,
ssList(sk1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_1) ).
fof(f294,plain,
( ~ ssList(sk3)
| singletonP(sk3)
| ~ ssItem(sk5)
| ~ spl0_4 ),
inference(superposition,[],[f206,f232]) ).
fof(f232,plain,
( sk3 = cons(sk5,nil)
| ~ spl0_4 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f230]) ).
fof(f230,plain,
( spl0_4
<=> sk3 = cons(sk5,nil) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_4])]) ).
fof(f206,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ ssList(cons(X0,nil))
| singletonP(cons(X0,nil))
| ~ ssItem(X0) ),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f116]) ).
fof(f116,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( singletonP(X1)
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssItem(X0)
| cons(X0,nil) != X1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause116) ).
fof(f248,plain,
~ spl0_2,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f247]) ).
fof(f247,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f246,f244]) ).
fof(f244,plain,
( neq(nil,nil)
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f202,f222]) ).
fof(f222,plain,
( nil = sk4
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f220]) ).
fof(f220,plain,
( spl0_2
<=> nil = sk4 ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])]) ).
fof(f202,plain,
neq(sk4,nil),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f192,f190]) ).
fof(f190,axiom,
sk2 = sk4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).
fof(f192,axiom,
neq(sk2,nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).
fof(f246,plain,
~ neq(nil,nil),
inference(resolution,[],[f213,f8]) ).
fof(f8,axiom,
ssList(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause8) ).
fof(f213,plain,
! [X1] :
( ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ neq(X1,X1) ),
inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f205]) ).
fof(f205,plain,
! [X1] :
( ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ neq(X1,X1) ),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f115]) ).
fof(f115,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ ssList(X0)
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ neq(X0,X1)
| X0 != X1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause115) ).
fof(f233,plain,
( spl0_4
| spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f196,f220,f230]) ).
fof(f196,axiom,
( nil = sk4
| sk3 = cons(sk5,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_11) ).
fof(f223,plain,
( spl0_1
| spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f194,f220,f216]) ).
fof(f194,axiom,
( nil = sk4
| ssItem(sk5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_9) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : SWC256-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.12/0.15 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.36 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.36 % DateTime : Sun May 19 03:32:38 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN problem
% 0.13/0.36 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.48/0.69 % (28239)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.48/0.69 % (28236)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.48/0.69 % (28232)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.48/0.69 % (28234)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.48/0.69 % (28233)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.48/0.69 % (28235)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.48/0.69 % (28239)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (28239)------------------------------
% 0.48/0.69 % (28239)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.48/0.69 % (28239)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.48/0.69
% 0.48/0.69 % (28239)Memory used [KB]: 1172
% 0.48/0.69 % (28239)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.48/0.69 % (28239)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.48/0.69 % (28239)------------------------------
% 0.48/0.69 % (28239)------------------------------
% 0.48/0.69 % (28236)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (28236)------------------------------
% 0.48/0.69 % (28236)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.48/0.69 % (28236)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.48/0.69
% 0.48/0.69 % (28236)Memory used [KB]: 1263
% 0.48/0.69 % (28236)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.48/0.69 % (28236)Instructions burned: 12 (million)
% 0.48/0.69 % (28236)------------------------------
% 0.48/0.69 % (28236)------------------------------
% 0.48/0.69 % (28232)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (28232)------------------------------
% 0.48/0.69 % (28232)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.48/0.69 % (28232)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.48/0.69
% 0.48/0.69 % (28232)Memory used [KB]: 1207
% 0.48/0.69 % (28232)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.48/0.69 % (28232)Instructions burned: 8 (million)
% 0.48/0.69 % (28234)First to succeed.
% 0.48/0.69 % (28232)------------------------------
% 0.48/0.69 % (28232)------------------------------
% 0.48/0.69 % (28238)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.48/0.69 % (28237)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.48/0.69 % (28234)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-28231"
% 0.48/0.69 % (28240)lrs+21_1:16_sil=2000:sp=occurrence:urr=on:flr=on:i=55:sd=1:nm=0:ins=3:ss=included:rawr=on:br=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/55Mi)
% 0.48/0.69 % (28234)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.48/0.69 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.48/0.69 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.48/0.69 % (28234)------------------------------
% 0.48/0.69 % (28234)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.48/0.69 % (28234)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.48/0.69
% 0.48/0.69 % (28234)Memory used [KB]: 1211
% 0.48/0.69 % (28234)Time elapsed: 0.007 s
% 0.48/0.69 % (28234)Instructions burned: 8 (million)
% 0.48/0.69 % (28231)Success in time 0.326 s
% 0.48/0.70 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------