TSTP Solution File: SWC254-1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SWC254-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:37:29 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.54s 0.75s
% Output   : Refutation 0.54s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   34 (   5 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   31 (  17   ~;  14   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    3 (   3   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f268,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f267,f223]) ).

fof(f223,plain,
    ssItem(sk5),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f199,f222]) ).

fof(f222,plain,
    neq(sk4,nil),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f206]) ).

fof(f206,plain,
    ( neq(sk4,nil)
    | neq(sk4,nil) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f192,f190,f190]) ).

fof(f190,axiom,
    sk2 = sk4,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).

fof(f192,axiom,
    ( neq(sk2,nil)
    | neq(sk2,nil) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).

fof(f199,axiom,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | ssItem(sk5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_14) ).

fof(f267,plain,
    ~ ssItem(sk5),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f266,f204]) ).

fof(f204,plain,
    ssList(sk3),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f186,f191]) ).

fof(f191,axiom,
    sk1 = sk3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).

fof(f186,axiom,
    ssList(sk1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_1) ).

fof(f266,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(sk3)
    | ~ ssItem(sk5) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f264,f228]) ).

fof(f228,plain,
    ~ singletonP(sk3),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f213,f222]) ).

fof(f213,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | ~ singletonP(sk3) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f203,f191]) ).

fof(f203,axiom,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | ~ singletonP(sk1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_18) ).

fof(f264,plain,
    ( singletonP(sk3)
    | ~ ssList(sk3)
    | ~ ssItem(sk5) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f218,f225]) ).

fof(f225,plain,
    sk3 = cons(sk5,nil),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f201,f222]) ).

fof(f201,axiom,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | sk3 = cons(sk5,nil) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_16) ).

fof(f218,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( singletonP(cons(X0,nil))
      | ~ ssList(cons(X0,nil))
      | ~ ssItem(X0) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f116]) ).

fof(f116,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( singletonP(X1)
      | ~ ssList(X1)
      | ~ ssItem(X0)
      | cons(X0,nil) != X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause116) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SWC254-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 03:30:38 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.35  This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN problem
% 0.15/0.35  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.54/0.74  % (14904)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.54/0.74  % (14899)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.54/0.74  % (14897)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.54/0.74  % (14904)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (14904)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.74  % (14904)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.54/0.74  % (14904)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.54/0.74  
% 0.54/0.74  % (14904)Memory used [KB]: 1170
% 0.54/0.74  % (14904)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.54/0.74  % (14904)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.54/0.74  % (14900)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.54/0.74  % (14898)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.54/0.74  % (14904)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.74  % (14904)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.74  % (14901)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.54/0.74  % (14903)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.54/0.74  % (14899)First to succeed.
% 0.54/0.74  % (14899)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-14896"
% 0.54/0.74  % (14901)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (14901)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.74  % (14901)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.54/0.74  % (14901)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.54/0.74  
% 0.54/0.74  % (14901)Memory used [KB]: 1263
% 0.54/0.74  % (14901)Time elapsed: 0.008 s
% 0.54/0.74  % (14901)Instructions burned: 12 (million)
% 0.54/0.74  % (14901)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.74  % (14901)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.74  % (14898)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.54/0.75  % (14899)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.54/0.75  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.54/0.75  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.54/0.75  % (14899)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.75  % (14899)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.54/0.75  % (14899)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.54/0.75  
% 0.54/0.75  % (14899)Memory used [KB]: 1195
% 0.54/0.75  % (14899)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.54/0.75  % (14899)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 0.54/0.75  % (14896)Success in time 0.381 s
% 0.54/0.75  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------