TSTP Solution File: SWC219-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SWC219-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:24:31 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.51s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 38 ( 13 unt; 4 nHn; 38 RR)
% Number of literals : 92 ( 30 equ; 60 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 39 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(co1_7,negated_conjecture,
nil != sk1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).
cnf(co1_10,negated_conjecture,
( memberP(X3,sk5(X3,X2,X1))
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X3)
| app(app(X2,cons(X1,nil)),X3) != sk1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_10) ).
cnf(co1_18,negated_conjecture,
( cons(sk6,nil) = sk3
| nil = sk3 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_18) ).
cnf(co1_6,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).
cnf(clause71,axiom,
( ~ memberP(nil,X1)
| ~ ssItem(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause71) ).
cnf(co1_8,negated_conjecture,
( ssItem(sk5(X3,X2,X1))
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X3)
| app(app(X2,cons(X1,nil)),X3) != sk1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_8) ).
cnf(clause8,axiom,
ssList(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause8) ).
cnf(clause74,axiom,
( app(nil,X1) = X1
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause74) ).
cnf(clause73,axiom,
( app(X1,nil) = X1
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause73) ).
cnf(co1_1,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_1) ).
cnf(co1_14,negated_conjecture,
( ssItem(sk6)
| nil = sk3 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_14) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
nil != sk1,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( memberP(X3,sk5(X3,X2,X1))
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X3)
| app(app(X2,cons(X1,nil)),X3) != sk1 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( cons(sk6,nil) = sk3
| nil = sk3 ),
co1_18 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
co1_6 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
nil != sk1,
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ memberP(nil,X1)
| ~ ssItem(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause71]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( memberP(X3,sk5(X3,X2,X1))
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X3)
| app(app(X2,cons(X1,nil)),X3) != sk1 ),
c_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = cons(sk6,nil),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( ssItem(sk5(X3,X2,X1))
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X3)
| app(app(X2,cons(X1,nil)),X3) != sk1 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ memberP(nil,X1)
| ~ ssItem(X1) ),
c_0_16 ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( memberP(X1,sk5(X1,X2,X3))
| app(app(X2,cons(X3,nil)),X1) != cons(sk6,nil)
| ~ ssItem(X3)
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
ssList(nil),
clause8 ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( ssItem(sk5(X3,X2,X1))
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X3)
| app(app(X2,cons(X1,nil)),X3) != sk1 ),
c_0_19 ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
( app(app(X1,cons(X2,nil)),nil) != cons(sk6,nil)
| ~ ssItem(sk5(nil,X1,X2))
| ~ ssItem(X2)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( ssItem(sk5(X1,X2,X3))
| app(app(X2,cons(X3,nil)),X1) != cons(sk6,nil)
| ~ ssItem(X3)
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( app(nil,X1) = X1
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause74]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
( app(app(X1,cons(X2,nil)),nil) != cons(sk6,nil)
| ~ ssItem(X2)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_22])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( app(nil,X1) = X1
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
c_0_26 ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( app(X1,nil) = X1
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause73]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
( app(cons(X1,nil),nil) != cons(sk6,nil)
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssList(cons(X1,nil)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_22])]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( app(X1,nil) = X1
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
c_0_29 ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk1),
co1_1 ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
( ssItem(sk6)
| nil = sk3 ),
co1_14 ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
( cons(X1,nil) != cons(sk6,nil)
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssList(cons(X1,nil)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
ssList(cons(sk6,nil)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
ssItem(sk6),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_36])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.11 % Problem : SWC219-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.09/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Sun May 19 03:40:52 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.44 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.51 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.17/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.51 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.51 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.51 # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 4275 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.51 # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.17/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.51 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.51 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.51 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.51 # Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.17/0.51 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 675s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.51 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.51 # Starting G-E--_207_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.51 # Starting U----_116Y_C05_02_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.51 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.51 # G-E--_207_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0Y with pid 4283 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.51 # Result found by G-E--_207_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0Y
% 0.17/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.51 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.51 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.51 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.51 # Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.17/0.51 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 675s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.51 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.51 # Starting G-E--_207_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.51 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.17/0.51 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/0.51
% 0.17/0.51 # Proof found!
% 0.17/0.51 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.17/0.51 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.51 # Parsed axioms : 205
% 0.17/0.51 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.17/0.51 # Initial clauses : 205
% 0.17/0.51 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.17/0.51 # Initial clauses in saturation : 205
% 0.17/0.51 # Processed clauses : 445
% 0.17/0.51 # ...of these trivial : 4
% 0.17/0.51 # ...subsumed : 19
% 0.17/0.51 # ...remaining for further processing : 422
% 0.17/0.51 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 82
% 0.17/0.51 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.17/0.51 # Backward-subsumed : 4
% 0.17/0.51 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.17/0.51 # Generated clauses : 898
% 0.17/0.51 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 742
% 0.17/0.51 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.51 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 4
% 0.17/0.51 # Paramodulations : 798
% 0.17/0.51 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.17/0.51 # NegExts : 0
% 0.17/0.51 # Equation resolutions : 99
% 0.17/0.51 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.17/0.51 # Total rewrite steps : 701
% 0.17/0.51 # ...of those cached : 590
% 0.17/0.51 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.17/0.51 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.17/0.51 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.51 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.51 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.51 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.17/0.51 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.51 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.51 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.51 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.51 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.51 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.51 # Current number of processed clauses : 213
% 0.17/0.51 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 59
% 0.17/0.51 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.51 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.17/0.51 # Non-unit-clauses : 151
% 0.17/0.51 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 697
% 0.17/0.51 # ...number of literals in the above : 4671
% 0.17/0.51 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.17/0.51 # Current number of archived clauses : 204
% 0.17/0.51 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 11955
% 0.17/0.51 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1362
% 0.17/0.51 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 25
% 0.17/0.51 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 19
% 0.17/0.51 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.17/0.51 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.17/0.51 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.17/0.51 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.17/0.51 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.17/0.51 # Termbank termtop insertions : 26640
% 0.17/0.51 # Search garbage collected termcells : 563
% 0.17/0.51
% 0.17/0.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.51 # User time : 0.046 s
% 0.17/0.51 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.17/0.51 # Total time : 0.050 s
% 0.17/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 2136 pages
% 0.17/0.51
% 0.17/0.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.51 # User time : 0.216 s
% 0.17/0.51 # System time : 0.021 s
% 0.17/0.51 # Total time : 0.236 s
% 0.17/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 1876 pages
% 0.17/0.51 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.17/0.51 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------