TSTP Solution File: SWC203+1 by iProver---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9
% Problem  : SWC203+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May  3 03:11:34 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 1.13s 1.18s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  116 (  43 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   18 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  119 (  23   ~;   8   |;  76   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  12  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   15 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   32 (   0 sgn   8   !;  24   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f96,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
         => ! [X2] :
              ( ssList(X2)
             => ! [X3] :
                  ( ssList(X3)
                 => ( neq(X0,nil)
                    | ~ neq(X1,nil)
                    | X2 != X3
                    | X0 != X2
                    | X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(f97,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( ssList(X0)
       => ! [X1] :
            ( ssList(X1)
           => ! [X2] :
                ( ssList(X2)
               => ! [X3] :
                    ( ssList(X3)
                   => ( neq(X0,nil)
                      | ~ neq(X1,nil)
                      | X2 != X3
                      | X0 != X2
                      | X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f96]) ).

fof(f221,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ~ neq(X0,nil)
                  & neq(X1,nil)
                  & X2 = X3
                  & X0 = X2
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).

fof(f222,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ~ neq(X0,nil)
                  & neq(X1,nil)
                  & X2 = X3
                  & X0 = X2
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f221]) ).

fof(f343,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( ? [X1] :
            ( ? [X2] :
                ( ? [X3] :
                    ( ~ neq(X0,nil)
                    & neq(X1,nil)
                    & X2 = X3
                    & X0 = X2
                    & X1 = X3
                    & ssList(X3) )
                & ssList(X2) )
            & ssList(X1) )
        & ssList(X0) )
   => ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ~ neq(sK53,nil)
                  & neq(X1,nil)
                  & X2 = X3
                  & sK53 = X2
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(sK53) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f344,plain,
    ( ? [X1] :
        ( ? [X2] :
            ( ? [X3] :
                ( ~ neq(sK53,nil)
                & neq(X1,nil)
                & X2 = X3
                & sK53 = X2
                & X1 = X3
                & ssList(X3) )
            & ssList(X2) )
        & ssList(X1) )
   => ( ? [X2] :
          ( ? [X3] :
              ( ~ neq(sK53,nil)
              & neq(sK54,nil)
              & X2 = X3
              & sK53 = X2
              & sK54 = X3
              & ssList(X3) )
          & ssList(X2) )
      & ssList(sK54) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f345,plain,
    ( ? [X2] :
        ( ? [X3] :
            ( ~ neq(sK53,nil)
            & neq(sK54,nil)
            & X2 = X3
            & sK53 = X2
            & sK54 = X3
            & ssList(X3) )
        & ssList(X2) )
   => ( ? [X3] :
          ( ~ neq(sK53,nil)
          & neq(sK54,nil)
          & sK55 = X3
          & sK53 = sK55
          & sK54 = X3
          & ssList(X3) )
      & ssList(sK55) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f346,plain,
    ( ? [X3] :
        ( ~ neq(sK53,nil)
        & neq(sK54,nil)
        & sK55 = X3
        & sK53 = sK55
        & sK54 = X3
        & ssList(X3) )
   => ( ~ neq(sK53,nil)
      & neq(sK54,nil)
      & sK55 = sK56
      & sK53 = sK55
      & sK54 = sK56
      & ssList(sK56) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f347,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sK53,nil)
    & neq(sK54,nil)
    & sK55 = sK56
    & sK53 = sK55
    & sK54 = sK56
    & ssList(sK56)
    & ssList(sK55)
    & ssList(sK54)
    & ssList(sK53) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK53,sK54,sK55,sK56])],[f222,f346,f345,f344,f343]) ).

fof(f551,plain,
    sK54 = sK56,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f347]) ).

fof(f552,plain,
    sK53 = sK55,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f347]) ).

fof(f553,plain,
    sK55 = sK56,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f347]) ).

fof(f554,plain,
    neq(sK54,nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f347]) ).

fof(f555,plain,
    ~ neq(sK53,nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f347]) ).

fof(f556,plain,
    sK53 = sK56,
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f552,f553]) ).

fof(f557,plain,
    ~ neq(sK56,nil),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f555,f556]) ).

fof(f558,plain,
    neq(sK56,nil),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f554,f551]) ).

cnf(c_246,negated_conjecture,
    ~ neq(sK56,nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f557]) ).

cnf(c_247,negated_conjecture,
    neq(sK56,nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f558]) ).

cnf(c_252,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_246,c_247]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : SWC203+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu May  2 23:28:04 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.46  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.46  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 1.13/1.18  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.13/1.18  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.13/1.18  
% 1.13/1.18  %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 1.13/1.18  
% 1.13/1.18  ------  iProver source info
% 1.13/1.18  
% 1.13/1.18  git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 1.13/1.18  git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 1.13/1.18  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.13/1.18  
% 1.13/1.18  ------ Parsing...
% 1.13/1.18  ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 1.13/1.18  
% 1.13/1.18  ------ Preprocessing...
% 1.13/1.18  
% 1.13/1.18  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.13/1.18  
% 1.13/1.18  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.13/1.18  
% 1.13/1.18  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------