TSTP Solution File: SWC189-1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : SWC189-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 03:11:31 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 3.47s 0.97s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.47s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_54,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).
cnf(c_55,negated_conjecture,
( app(app(app(X0,cons(X1,nil)),cons(X2,nil)),X3) != sk3
| ~ ssList(X0)
| ~ ssList(X3)
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssItem(X2)
| X1 = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).
cnf(c_56,negated_conjecture,
ssItem(sk5),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_8) ).
cnf(c_57,negated_conjecture,
ssItem(sk6),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_9) ).
cnf(c_58,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk7),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_10) ).
cnf(c_59,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk8),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_11) ).
cnf(c_60,negated_conjecture,
app(app(app(sk7,cons(sk5,nil)),cons(sk6,nil)),sk8) = sk1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_12) ).
cnf(c_61,negated_conjecture,
sk5 != sk6,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_13) ).
cnf(c_2388,plain,
( app(app(app(X0,cons(X1,nil)),cons(X2,nil)),X3) != sk1
| ~ ssList(X0)
| ~ ssList(X3)
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssItem(X2)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_54]) ).
cnf(c_6338,plain,
cons(sk5,nil) = sP2_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_6339,plain,
app(sk7,sP2_iProver_def) = sP3_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_6340,plain,
cons(sk6,nil) = sP4_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_6341,plain,
app(sP3_iProver_def,sP4_iProver_def) = sP5_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_6342,plain,
app(sP5_iProver_def,sk8) = sP6_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_6343,negated_conjecture,
sk5 != sk6,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_61]) ).
cnf(c_6344,negated_conjecture,
sP6_iProver_def = sk1,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_6340,c_6338,c_6339,c_6341,c_6342]) ).
cnf(c_6345,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk8),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_59]) ).
cnf(c_6346,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk7),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_58]) ).
cnf(c_6347,negated_conjecture,
ssItem(sk6),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_57]) ).
cnf(c_6348,negated_conjecture,
ssItem(sk5),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_56]) ).
cnf(c_8903,plain,
( app(app(app(X0,cons(X1,nil)),cons(X2,nil)),X3) != sP6_iProver_def
| ~ ssList(X0)
| ~ ssList(X3)
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssItem(X2)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2388,c_6344]) ).
cnf(c_8914,plain,
( app(app(app(X0,sP2_iProver_def),cons(X1,nil)),X2) != sP6_iProver_def
| ~ ssList(X0)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssItem(sk5)
| X1 = sk5 ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6338,c_8903]) ).
cnf(c_8922,plain,
( app(app(app(X0,sP2_iProver_def),cons(X1,nil)),X2) != sP6_iProver_def
| ~ ssList(X0)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| X1 = sk5 ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_8914,c_6348]) ).
cnf(c_8952,plain,
( app(app(sP3_iProver_def,cons(X0,nil)),X1) != sP6_iProver_def
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssItem(X0)
| ~ ssList(sk7)
| X0 = sk5 ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6339,c_8922]) ).
cnf(c_8953,plain,
( app(app(sP3_iProver_def,cons(X0,nil)),X1) != sP6_iProver_def
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssItem(X0)
| X0 = sk5 ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_8952,c_6346]) ).
cnf(c_8968,plain,
( app(app(sP3_iProver_def,sP4_iProver_def),X0) != sP6_iProver_def
| ~ ssList(X0)
| ~ ssItem(sk6)
| sk5 = sk6 ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6340,c_8953]) ).
cnf(c_8973,plain,
( app(sP5_iProver_def,X0) != sP6_iProver_def
| ~ ssList(X0)
| ~ ssItem(sk6)
| sk5 = sk6 ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_8968,c_6341]) ).
cnf(c_8974,plain,
( app(sP5_iProver_def,X0) != sP6_iProver_def
| ~ ssList(X0) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_8973,c_6343,c_6347]) ).
cnf(c_9111,plain,
~ ssList(sk8),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6342,c_8974]) ).
cnf(c_9112,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_9111,c_6345]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.07 % Problem : SWC189-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.08/0.27 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.27 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.27 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.27 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.27 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.27 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.27 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.27 % DateTime : Thu May 2 23:57:07 EDT 2024
% 0.08/0.27 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.36 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.36 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 3.47/0.97 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.47/0.97 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.47/0.97
% 3.47/0.97 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 3.47/0.97
% 3.47/0.97 ------ iProver source info
% 3.47/0.97
% 3.47/0.97 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 3.47/0.97 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 3.47/0.97 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.47/0.97
% 3.47/0.97 ------ Parsing...successful
% 3.47/0.97
% 3.47/0.97
% 3.47/0.97
% 3.47/0.97 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 5 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 3.47/0.97
% 3.47/0.97 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 2 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 3.47/0.97
% 3.47/0.97 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 3.47/0.97 ------ Proving...
% 3.47/0.97 ------ Problem Properties
% 3.47/0.97
% 3.47/0.97
% 3.47/0.97 clauses 193
% 3.47/0.97 conjectures 10
% 3.47/0.97 EPR 62
% 3.47/0.97 Horn 165
% 3.47/0.97 unary 73
% 3.47/0.97 binary 21
% 3.47/0.97 lits 562
% 3.47/0.97 lits eq 80
% 3.47/0.97 fd_pure 0
% 3.47/0.97 fd_pseudo 0
% 3.47/0.97 fd_cond 15
% 3.47/0.97 fd_pseudo_cond 15
% 3.47/0.97 AC symbols 0
% 3.47/0.97
% 3.47/0.97 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 3.47/0.97
% 3.47/0.97 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.47/0.97
% 3.47/0.97
% 3.47/0.97 ------
% 3.47/0.97 Current options:
% 3.47/0.97 ------
% 3.47/0.97
% 3.47/0.97
% 3.47/0.97
% 3.47/0.97
% 3.47/0.97 ------ Proving...
% 3.47/0.97
% 3.47/0.97
% 3.47/0.97 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.47/0.97
% 3.47/0.97 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.47/0.97
% 3.47/0.97
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------